Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!! http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!! http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey
Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in numbers.
Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!! http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey
Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in numbers.
I'm not a member so can't post but if anyone is and can.....
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!! http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey
Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in numbers.
I'm not a member so can't post but if anyone is and can.....
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
Posted in the campaign section (wasn't too sure where to post it).
I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no further.
You are an honest man Mr Colyer.
In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no > further. You are an honest man Mr Colyer.
In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
One of the things I hated about London was being asked to participate in surveys. The Golgafrinchans use the results to make what you want cost you more.
> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no > further. You are an honest man Mr Colyer.
In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
And not because you have to go to London for work? Oh well, takes all sorts. (I looked at it, thought "I don't work/live/cycle in London", and closed it.)
Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100: >> But I don't live in London!
and Tony Raven responded: > Neither do I. Still filled it in.
I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no further.
You are an honest man Mr Colyer.
In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
I left that bit blank and filled the rest in. I find myself on a bike in London for 2 or 3 hours a year, which I suspect is above the mean for Londoners, and definitely above the median, so I feel justified in writing.
So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
Last time I visited London was 5 years ago, test riding recumbents. Last time I cycled there other than test riding recumbents was 2 or 3 years before that, and I've only cycled in London 2 or 3 times. Probably best that I didn't continue, then.
So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
Last time I visited London was 5 years ago, test riding recumbents. Last time I cycled there other than test riding recumbents was 2 or 3 years before that, and I've only cycled in London 2 or 3 times. Probably best that I didn't continue, then.
I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get a news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts" which seemed to be the thrust of the questions.
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
In article <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get a news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts" which seemed to be the thrust of the questions.
I doubt though that many of those who cycle on pavements, jump red lights or otherwise disregard the law would have admitted the fact.
I completed it but wasn't comfortable with the general trend of the questionnaire.
In article <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get a news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts" which seemed to be the thrust of the questions.
I doubt though that many of those who cycle on pavements, jump red lights or otherwise disregard the law would have admitted the fact.
I completed it but wasn't comfortable with the general trend of the questionnaire.
But it was mainly aimed at motorists and pedestrians from the questions posed and it was to counterbalance them, not other cyclists......never mind its closed now.
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
In stitches at Tony Raven. Well done Tony - anyone who makes marketers tear their hair out by skewing their skewed 'surveys', gets my congratulations. Whenever surveyed by such sharks, online, in the street, or on paper, I lie automatically, convincingly and proudly. Whoever composed their survey had not the slightest intention of coming to representative conclusions on cycling in London, so it would be positively naive to be honest when filling it in. In my experience they may well add a random 'correction' to make up for the fact that the responses don't match what the marketing department/journalist is promoting/assuming.The resulting article is bound to be more than irritating.
Hopefully, some cyclist from the ngp or elsewhere has added to their self-induced despair by emailing them to complain about the slant of the survey and (most importantly), promising never to buy Time Out again. Marketers estimate that 'for one person who bothers to write in, 1000* are of the same opinion'.