General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

URC and walking poles

Started by Bernard · · Last activity · 8 posts · 434 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 March 2004
Last activity
4 March 2004
Original author
Bernard
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
434
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There is a Hill Walking thread over in uk.rec.cycling where walking poles are being discussed. It
    looks like the thread was started by a Scottish student.

  2. "Bernard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There is a Hill Walking thread over in uk.rec.cycling where walking


    poles

    Quoted message said:

    are being discussed. It looks like the thread was started by a


    Scottish

    Quoted message said:

    student.

    Perhaps Pete Clinch will post them the entire content of his massively memorable poles
    discussion/flame war from rec.backcountry a few years back? :-) :-) :-)

    Pray it doesn't bring the URCers here. There are some dangerous nutters there to start with, and
    they will inevitably crosspost to uk.rec.scouting and uk.transport before the thread dies.

    I find even lurking in URC is terrifying these days...
    --
    Mark South: Citizen of the World, Denizen of the Net

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Pray it doesn't bring the URCers here. There are some dangerous nutters there to start with


    Some of us are already here!

  4. Quoted message said:

    Pray it doesn't bring the URCers here. There are some dangerous nutters there to start with, and
    they will inevitably crosspost to uk.rec.scouting and uk.transport before the thread dies.

    One of us is already here

    Richard Webb

  5. "RJ Webb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Pray it doesn't bring the URCers here. There are some dangerous


    nutters

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    there to start with, and they will inevitably crosspost to uk.rec.scouting and uk.transport
    before the thread dies.

    One of us is already here

    Neither you nor "marc" count as dangerous nutters. Nutters, probably! -- after all you seem to be
    cyclists. Piloting an inherently unstable vehicle across dangerous terrain is not exactly the
    preserve of the sane, is it now? :-) :-)

    By "dangerous" I meant those willing and able to flood the entire group with their opinions on
    everything under the sun and to do their level best to turn thread drift into thread thrash.

    And crosspost to uk.transport to top it off. Now have you guessed which two charming induhviduals I
    have in mind?

    Strangely, I have never felt the need for walking poles on a bicycle, but have found them jolly
    useful around mountains and bogs. They kill slugs more quietly than a shotgun too.

    --
    Mark South: Citizen of the World, Denizen of the Net

  6. "Mark South" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    By "dangerous" I meant those willing and able to flood the entire group with their opinions on
    everything under the sun and to do their level best to turn thread drift into thread thrash.

    As I said on there I think the sad thing about URC is that several people are just there for the
    purpose of arguing and are willing to shout loudly about stuff they know nothing about regardless of
    whether or not they've got their facts right. I've certainly developed a mental note of several
    people who's opinions I wouldn't trust on anything.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]- spam.co.uk says...

    Quoted message said:

    several people are just there for the purpose of arguing and are willing to shout loudly about
    stuff they know nothing about regardless of whether or not they've got their facts right. I've
    certainly developed a mental note of several people who's opinions I wouldn't trust on anything.


    Doesn't that apply to every NG , including this one?

  8. Quoted message said:

    And crosspost to uk.transport to top it off. Now have you guessed which two charming induhviduals I
    have in mind?

    Yes.. you make a very good point...

    Mind after dipping into the Embra airport group, I find urc quite sane...

    Meanwhile here remains an oasis of sanity, even if I have fed one troll to often recently , you know
    who I mean ...

    Richard Webb

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.