Road Cycling · Public discussion

Upper Body Muscle Atrophy

Started by DaveH · · Last activity · 21 posts · 1,275 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 September 2004
Last activity
27 September 2004
Original author
DaveH
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,275
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. 45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.

    Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.

    My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs and
    calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?
    Dave

  2. DaveH wrote:
    :: 45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    :: cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.
    ::
    :: Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    :: such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.
    ::
    :: My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs
    :: and calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my
    :: upper body muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like
    :: muscle tissue is being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?

    Yes, get yourself to the gym and start lifting. Muscle tissue isn't being
    transfered, but if, by virtue of your cycling, you are creating a calorie
    deficit, and you are not doing any resistance work for your upper body, then
    you body will use your muscle tissue as food for energy (so fat too, btw).
    The proper response is to eat adequate protein and do resistance training
    for your upper body (actually, as a recreation rider, you really should do a
    full-body routine). That regular and consistent resistance against your
    muscle will send a message to your body to NOT eat the muscle tissue for
    fuel (since that muscle is needed in your day-to-day activities) if you
    maintain a caloric deficit. Fat will be used moreso than muscle.

    If you don't want to go to a gym, you can get some free weights and an
    adjustable bench, or if that is not possible, just start doing bodyweight
    exercises like pushups, chinups/pullups, dips between chairs, etc.

  3. DaveH said:

    my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?

    try mountain biking... that will solve the problem. :-)

    charlie

  4. Roger Zoul said:

    DaveH wrote:
    :: 45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    :: cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.
    ::
    :: Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    :: such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.
    ::
    :: My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs
    :: and calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my
    :: upper body muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like
    :: muscle tissue is being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?

    Yes, get yourself to the gym and start lifting. Muscle tissue isn't being
    transfered, but if, by virtue of your cycling, you are creating a calorie
    deficit, and you are not doing any resistance work for your upper body, then
    you body will use your muscle tissue as food for energy (so fat too, btw).
    The proper response is to eat adequate protein and do resistance training
    for your upper body (actually, as a recreation rider, you really should do a
    full-body routine). That regular and consistent resistance against your
    muscle will send a message to your body to NOT eat the muscle tissue for
    fuel (since that muscle is needed in your day-to-day activities) if you
    maintain a caloric deficit. Fat will be used moreso than muscle.

    If you don't want to go to a gym, you can get some free weights and an
    adjustable bench, or if that is not possible, just start doing bodyweight
    exercises like pushups, chinups/pullups, dips between chairs, etc.


    Thanks for this response Roger. I suspected that which you've clearly
    explained. I've been getting adequate protein but alas, no upper
    workout. I was a fairly serious power lifter in my teens and 20's.

    It really is interesting, though, the body's response. Exactly as you
    describe. An exception to the upper body loss is my stomach muscles
    which are clearly being worked during vigorous cycling.

  5. hey Roger, I just wanted to say thanks for the line:
    "actually, as a recreation rider, you really should do a full-body routine"

    I ride about the same as this guy, maybe 120KM a week going to school and
    back and such, and I've been toying with the idea of using the free gym at
    the university. The arguement against it being "i get enough excercise
    already", but I see how some full body training would be necessary to be
    overall in-shape, not just legs 🙂

    Mike

  6. Charles Beristain said:
    DaveH said:

    my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?

    try mountain biking... that will solve the problem. :-)

    charlie


    Really? Why?

  7. "Mike Beauchamp" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I ride about the same as this guy, maybe 120KM a week going to school and
    back and such, and I've been toying with the idea of using the free gym at
    the university. The arguement against it being "i get enough excercise
    already", but I see how some full body training would be necessary to be
    overall in-shape, not just legs 🙂

    Mike

    Yep, I ride a lot but also go to the gym 2-3x a week for upper body and ab
    workout, and everything stays in pretty good balance. Having some
    upper-body strength helps on the bike, I think (plus it looks much better
    than the alternative!)

    Emily

  8. DaveH said:

    Really? Why?

    mountain biking requires lots of upper body.. unless one is just
    riding fire roads, etc. Downhill requires the most upper body. A day
    of riding the lifts up the mountain and freeriding down will have the
    arm muscles burning. Racing X/C will do the same. big side loads
    require pushing back on the handlebars to keep the front wheel on a
    line.

    charlie

  9. DaveH said:
    Roger Zoul said:

    Yes, get yourself to the gym and start lifting. Muscle tissue isn't being
    transfered, but if, by virtue of your cycling, you are creating a calorie
    deficit, and you are not doing any resistance work for your upper body, then
    you body will use your muscle tissue as food for energy (so fat too, btw).
    The proper response is to eat adequate protein and do resistance training
    for your upper body (actually, as a recreation rider, you really should do a
    full-body routine). That regular and consistent resistance against your
    muscle will send a message to your body to NOT eat the muscle tissue for
    fuel (since that muscle is needed in your day-to-day activities) if you
    maintain a caloric deficit. Fat will be used moreso than muscle.

    Not if you go into starvation mode. Then muscle will be consumed
    preferential to fat.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you don't want to go to a gym, you can get some free weights and an
    adjustable bench, or if that is not possible, just start doing bodyweight
    exercises like pushups, chinups/pullups, dips between chairs, etc.


    Thanks for this response Roger. I suspected that which you've clearly
    explained. I've been getting adequate protein but alas, no upper
    workout. I was a fairly serious power lifter in my teens and 20's.

    It really is interesting, though, the body's response. Exactly as you
    describe. An exception to the upper body loss is my stomach muscles
    which are clearly being worked during vigorous cycling.

    "Adaptation". Your body is constantly taking a little
    here and putting it there. Fat folks have adapted to the
    world they create with their energy inputs and outputs.
    Corporations have learned to farm the retail food
    environment to encourage fat folks to become constant
    eaters. Some say intentionally, because we're far too
    knowledgeable about nutrition for top scientists at a
    company like McDonald's not to know what's going on in
    menu design.

    But that's not my point.

    My point is, look at your diet carefully. Make sure you're
    getting enough protein to hold your whole body lean mass
    up. And make sure you're getting enough calories so that
    you don't go into "starvation mode." In starvation mode,
    your body will eat muscle to lower your metabolosm so it
    can save fat (so you can survive the famine and migration
    it thinks you've entered into; it doesn't care if you're
    buff, it only cares that you live a few more days and get a
    chance to find food). N.B.: at 20% body fat and 180 lbs,
    a human has enough stored lipids to stay alive for about
    8 weeks; eating your muscles extends that by quite a lot.

    The upper-body exercise advice is excellent. I'm 41 and
    after a 12 year break got back on my bike two months ago.
    I had already been at about a 500-calorie deficit and
    losing 1 lb a week right on schedule, but the added
    500-1000 calories per day of exercise (I was riding 7 days
    a week except when I hiked or golfed) kicked me right over
    the 800-1000 calorie deficit threshold and into starvation
    mode. My deltoids deflated and my spare tire got bulbous.

    I immediately added protein supplements to my diet, but it
    took a few days to run into "starvation mode" on the net
    and realize that I needed to be more conscientious about
    my calorie level overall and my protein/carbohydrate/fat
    ratios and composition.

    Now I'm on about a 2500-3000 cal/day diet, taking 150-180
    grams of protein (food plus powder), still riding and
    still progressing*, but I'm working out my upper body
    hard at the gym 2-3 days a week with cycling in between
    (I think I've missed maybe 3 days with no solid exercise).

    My weight is 4 lbs below the day I started back on my
    bike (7/22), but my muscle mass is up. I wish I'd used
    a caliper the whole time (I'm buying one on the way home
    today) so I could tell for sure how the bodyfat loss is
    going, but it has to be down significantly because my
    thighs are as big as ever and rock hard, and my delts are
    bigger than before.

    I think I'm going to pare my diet another 200 calories and
    see if the fat doesn't start to go faster. It's hard to do,
    because I eyeball everything. So I need to start tracking
    the inputs assiduously.

    --Blair
    "I can talk your ear off about
    this stuff. That's worth about
    80 calories of dead weight right
    there."

    * - First day out, I did a 4.2-mile loop in about 22
    minutes (~11 mph) and could not climb the stairs without
    pulling on the railing afterward. 1 month later, my
    goal was 56 minutes for 4 laps of that loop. Tuesday,
    I clocked 50:15 for those 4 laps, and turned in my first
    20-mph average over my 16.8-mile TT. This morning I
    might have gone under 50:00, but my lower back got real
    tight on the third lap and then I miscalculated the split
    time and added a minute to it and figured I should go
    in before the muscle siezed. If I'd known it was 12:44
    instead of 13:44, you can bet your ass I would've just let
    that thing knot up and bought myself a massage at lunch.

    BTW, the AZ state record for 12.5-mile TT is 20.7 mph--
    for women 55-60! For men 40-45 it's 28.3 over 25 miles.
    So I figure I got some work to do before I can show my
    face in a race 'round hyar...

  10. DaveH <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.

    Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.

    My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs and
    calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?
    Dave

    If you have been sedentary and then started a regular and not
    excessive program of cycling or running, you will loose fat in
    addition to gaining muscle. Perhaps it is not arm muscle that has
    atrophied but arm fat? Is your arm strength weaker than it was 4
    months ago?

    Anyways, kudos on the success of your program. Keep it up.

  11. Blair P. Houghton said:

    My weight is 4 lbs below the day I started back on my
    bike (7/22), but my muscle mass is up. I wish I'd used
    a caliper the whole time (I'm buying one on the way home
    today) so I could tell for sure how the bodyfat loss is
    going, but it has to be down significantly because my
    thighs are as big as ever and rock hard, and my delts are
    bigger than before.

    Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    mass the way you guys do). I've only lost 7 pounds since the end of
    May, but I definitely have more muscle mass even so, which hopefully
    means I've lost more than 7 pounds of fat.

    I find it a little frustrating, losing only about a pound every three
    weeks, but at least it's more likely to stay off.

    -km

    --
    Only cowards fight kids -- unidentified Moscow protester
    the black rose
    proud to be owned by a yorkie
    http://community.webshots.com/user/blackrosequilts

  12. "the black rose" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Blair P. Houghton said:

    My weight is 4 lbs below the day I started back on my
    bike (7/22), but my muscle mass is up. I wish I'd used
    a caliper the whole time (I'm buying one on the way home
    today) so I could tell for sure how the bodyfat loss is
    going, but it has to be down significantly because my
    thighs are as big as ever and rock hard, and my delts are
    bigger than before.

    Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    mass the way you guys do). I've only lost 7 pounds since the end of
    May, but I definitely have more muscle mass even so, which hopefully
    means I've lost more than 7 pounds of fat.

    I find it a little frustrating, losing only about a pound every three
    weeks, but at least it's more likely to stay off.

    -km


    I agree that losing at a slow rate is frustrating but much better for you
    and easier to maintain. I've only lost 5 pounds since the start of summer
    but my body fat % has been steadily going down. In addition to the biking I
    also workout with weights at home and the gym 2-3 times a week. As a 61
    year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but I
    have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    You might be surprised in your body fat change. Get it measured if
    possible. I get mine measured at the gym and also have a Tanita scale at
    home which does a half-way decent job. It may not be accurate but at least
    it keeps track of the trend in change.

    Beverly

  13. DaveH <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.

    Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.

    My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs and
    calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?
    Dave


    Before making any recommendations there is a basic question. Are you
    losing upper body strength or just bulk. The two are not necessarily
    related. And depending on the answer quite different solutions are
    needed.

  14. Losing bulk and/or strength? I think both. I really do not know.
    Dave

    (gds) said:

    DaveH <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    45 yo, 4 months back into cycling after 20 years. Heavy drinking and
    cigarette free for about same period. 203- 193 lbs.

    Riding 60-80 miles a week. About 16 mph on flats. I battle hills in
    such a way that my legs are usually pumped after a ride.

    My legs have undergone a rather astonishing transformation. Thighs and
    calves clearly responding; but seemingly simultaneously, my upper body
    muscles--especially arms--have atrophied. It's like muscle tissue is
    being transferred from top to bottom. Thoughts?
    Dave


    Before making any recommendations there is a basic question. Are you
    losing upper body strength or just bulk. The two are not necessarily
    related. And depending on the answer quite different solutions are
    needed.

  15. "Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    mass the way you guys do).

    Quoted message said:

    As a 61
    year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but I
    have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    This really depends on your genes. My wife actually builds muscle about as
    fast as I do. When we both lifted seriously, she (@130) would freak people
    (including me) out by carrying me (@230) around. Some people are just
    naturally muscular.

  16. Peter Cole said:

    "Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    mass the way you guys do).

    Quoted message said:

    As a 61
    year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but I
    have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    This really depends on your genes. My wife actually builds muscle about as
    fast as I do. When we both lifted seriously, she (@130) would freak people
    (including me) out by carrying me (@230) around. Some people are just
    naturally muscular.

    Of course there are exceptions, and that's just fine. But in general,
    *most* women don't build muscle like men do. I certainly don't.

    -km

  17. "the black rose" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Cole said:

    "Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    >Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    >mass the way you guys do).

    Quoted message said:

    As a 61
    year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    This really depends on your genes. My wife actually builds muscle about


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    fast as I do. When we both lifted seriously, she (@130) would freak


    people

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (including me) out by carrying me (@230) around. Some people are just
    naturally muscular.

    Of course there are exceptions, and that's just fine. But in general,
    *most* women don't build muscle like men do. I certainly don't.

    I don't think many women try to build muscle, if anything, muscle bulk
    seems to be a thing most women want to avoid. Among the people who do
    intense cycling, either the ultra-cyclists or the racers, both the men and
    women seem to have pretty muscular legs.

  18. "the black rose" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Cole said:

    "Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    >Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    >mass the way you guys do).

    Quoted message said:

    As a 61
    year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but I
    have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    This really depends on your genes. My wife actually builds muscle about


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    fast as I do. When we both lifted seriously, she (@130) would freak


    people

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (including me) out by carrying me (@230) around. Some people are just
    naturally muscular.

    Of course there are exceptions, and that's just fine. But in general,
    *most* women don't build muscle like men do. I certainly don't.

    -km


    I agree and so does Krista. She has some great info for women and weight
    workouts.

    http://www.stumptuous.com/weights.html Hit the 'starting' and 'lies in the
    gym' buttons

    Beverly

  19. Beverly said:

    "the black rose" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Cole said:

    "Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote

    >>Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    >>mass the way you guys do).

    >As a 61
    >year old female I'm not going to see massive changes in my muscles but I
    >have noticed a big difference in the way clothes fit around the waist.

    This really depends on your genes. My wife actually builds muscle about

    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    fast as I do. When we both lifted seriously, she (@130) would freak

    people

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (including me) out by carrying me (@230) around. Some people are just
    naturally muscular.

    Of course there are exceptions, and that's just fine. But in general,
    *most* women don't build muscle like men do. I certainly don't.

    -km

    I agree and so does Krista. She has some great info for women and weight
    workouts.

    http://www.stumptuous.com/weights.html Hit the 'starting' and 'lies in the
    gym' buttons

    Beverly

    Ahhhh, yes, Mistress Krista. I admire her ability to swim the
    testosterone-poisoned waters of the weights newsgroup. Those guys can
    be brutal.

    My favorite quote in her Hall of Shame: "I've heard, 'You're over 40,
    you'll never be able to lose weight!'"

    Well gee. I didn't know I'd achieved the impossible. :-D

    -km

    --
    Only cowards fight kids -- unidentified Moscow protester
    the black rose
    proud to be owned by a yorkie
    http://community.webshots.com/user/blackrosequilts

  20. the black rose said:
    Blair P. Houghton said:

    My weight is 4 lbs below the day I started back on my
    bike (7/22), but my muscle mass is up. I wish I'd used
    a caliper the whole time (I'm buying one on the way home
    today) so I could tell for sure how the bodyfat loss is
    going, but it has to be down significantly because my
    thighs are as big as ever and rock hard, and my delts are
    bigger than before.

    Yeah, I have similar results (except as a female I don't build muscle
    mass the way you guys do). I've only lost 7 pounds since the end of
    May, but I definitely have more muscle mass even so, which hopefully
    means I've lost more than 7 pounds of fat.

    I find it a little frustrating, losing only about a pound every three
    weeks, but at least it's more likely to stay off.

    I think of it this way: even if I only lose a pound a month, I'll
    have 0% body fat by the time I'm 45.

    --Blair
    "Then the young chicks can't possibly
    kick sand in my face."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.