Let me first say that I am not asking this question for racing or competitive cycling. I am seriously getting back into riding for the love of it after several years off and I was wondering which benefits me most going uphill, seated or standing? I try to keep a constant cadence no lower than 90 and no slower than 14 mph going uphill. Am I wasting energy that can better be used later by staying in the saddle or does it make any difference?
Yes, it makes a big difference. Standing uses much more energy than sitting. A rule of thumb I try and use is, if it's fairly short and steep, I'll get out of the saddle. If it's of any length though, I try and stay seated. Sit for as long as possible.
Eventually, you are going to want to be good at climbing out of the saddle. Yes, it is very fatiguing at a high cadence (90-100), but I can think of at least three circumstances when you may want to employ it. First, on short hills I find I can often maintain bike speed by getting off the saddle in the gear I'm in on the flat and climbing at a very high output (e.g., 750w) for ~10-15 secs. Second, on long climbs I find that I can rest up a bit by getting off the saddle every 10 minutes or so because it uses different muscles and I can rest my back. Third, I recently had to get off the saddle >200w due to an injury (strained gluteus medius muscles), but I was able to keep riding and even doing intervals for about 2 months while they healed.
The trick is to develop a good off-the-saddle technique. It's all about rhythm, balance and timing. I think it's closer to a dance move than a cycling technique. I try to take full advantage of my body weight on each downstroke and I try to minimize the use of my upper body. I see some guys really using a lot of upper body strength throwing their bikes back and forth. I try to control my bike tilt with my legs and use my upper body very little. But, this takes some practice to learn.
First, on short hills I find I can often maintain bike speed by getting off the saddle in the gear I'm in on the flat and climbing at a very high output (e.g., 750w) for ~10-15 secs.
You brought up a point I have been meaning to ask about: watts. How is the watt output being measured?
You brought up a point I have been meaning to ask about: watts. How is the watt output being measured?
Watts is a measurement of the force being applied to the cranks x the cadence. It's analogous to measuring horsepower for an engine. I have a power meter (PowerTap) that tells me exactly how many watts I am producing at all times. Otherwise, you can go to this site and plug in assumptions for a rider and road conditions and derive the watts required to produce a certain speed. analyticcycling.comanalyticcycling.comOpen ↗
I have this weird psychological approach when I climb. I tend to pace myself using lamposts or trees. The other night I was doing a really long climb which required a lower gear and standing position for the initial onslaught. Then, there is a very long, uphill grade that I do in a bigger gear and drop back down into the seat. After that I fix my sights on a lampost and carry on pushing my way uphill in a big gear seated. Soon as I hit the lampost, I change down one gear and stand up for the steep finish. It sounds strange but if I know if I can stay seated till I get to the lampost, the standing effort seems to be curtailed to a few, short minutes. My mind plays games as I try and fight the pain of the effort.