UK and Europe · Public discussion

upgrading an old Dawes Galaxy - help needed !!

Started by Pete A · · Last activity · 8 posts · 953 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 December 2004
Last activity
17 December 2004
Original author
Pete A
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
953
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Thanks for comments Pete.

    Have fitted 110 bb - bike shop said this would give the best chain
    line possible, although it is still not good. Think problem is is that
    is must have originally been a 10 speed setup, and spacing at rear is
    not ideal for 7 speed freewheel. Wheel looks quite dished to me. Also,
    when I bought it it had been converted to a single speed setup, so the
    spacing on the rear wheel axle had to be changed. Bloke in bike shop
    says that this era of bike was never designed to have a triple
    chainset fitted, but I would have thought it would be possible to fit
    a triple to any bike, perhaps Im wrong ? Yes, have thought of fitting
    a 113bb, but would this move the inner ring out a full 3mm more ? If
    so, and if the chain line is still possible, then I may have to do
    this. Alternatively I thought I may look for a standard road triple
    chainset - this would allow me to move the front mech higher up the
    frame & also solving problem (wanted lowish gearing cos I want to do
    fully loaded touring at some point on bike).

    Think perhaps, although the earlier frames are supposed to be higher
    quality than later Dawes Galaxys it may have been a lot easier to
    spend more & buy a later model. Anyway, will try to get problem sorted
    - one way or another !!

  2. Pete A said:

    Thanks for comments Pete.

    Have fitted 110 bb - bike shop said this would give the best chain
    line possible, although it is still not good. Think problem is is that
    is must have originally been a 10 speed setup, and spacing at rear is
    not ideal for 7 speed freewheel. Wheel looks quite dished to me. Also,
    when I bought it it had been converted to a single speed setup, so the
    spacing on the rear wheel axle had to be changed. Bloke in bike shop
    says that this era of bike was never designed to have a triple
    chainset fitted, but I would have thought it would be possible to fit
    a triple to any bike, perhaps Im wrong ?

    I would have thought so too. I fitted a Campag road triple and 130mm
    wheel to my 1980's Raleigh that was designed for a double. Works well
    enough.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, have thought of fitting
    a 113bb, but would this move the inner ring out a full 3mm more ?

    No, only 1.5mm if the BB is symmetrical, like most are.

    Quoted message said:

    If
    so, and if the chain line is still possible, then I may have to do
    this. Alternatively I thought I may look for a standard road triple
    chainset - this would allow me to move the front mech higher up the
    frame & also solving problem (wanted lowish gearing cos I want to do
    fully loaded touring at some point on bike).

    A road triple would be a decent solution if you can tolerate a minimum
    middle ring of 38T for Shimano or 39T for Campag. Inner ring can go down
    to 24T.

    ~PB

  3. Pete Biggs said:

    I would have thought so too. I fitted a Campag road triple and 130mm
    wheel to my 1980's Raleigh that was designed for a double. Works well
    enough.

    JPEGS!

    130mm wheel? most wheels are around the 650mm size..

    ...d

  4. "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Pete A said:

    Thanks for comments Pete.

    Have fitted 110 bb - bike shop said this would give the best chain
    line possible, although it is still not good. Think problem is is that
    is must have originally been a 10 speed setup, and spacing at rear is
    not ideal for 7 speed freewheel. Wheel looks quite dished to me. Also,
    when I bought it it had been converted to a single speed setup, so the
    spacing on the rear wheel axle had to be changed. Bloke in bike shop
    says that this era of bike was never designed to have a triple
    chainset fitted, but I would have thought it would be possible to fit
    a triple to any bike, perhaps Im wrong ?

    I would have thought so too. I fitted a Campag road triple and 130mm
    wheel to my 1980's Raleigh that was designed for a double. Works well
    enough.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, have thought of fitting
    a 113bb, but would this move the inner ring out a full 3mm more ?

    No, only 1.5mm if the BB is symmetrical, like most are.

    Quoted message said:

    If
    so, and if the chain line is still possible, then I may have to do
    this. Alternatively I thought I may look for a standard road triple
    chainset - this would allow me to move the front mech higher up the
    frame & also solving problem (wanted lowish gearing cos I want to do
    fully loaded touring at some point on bike).

    A road triple would be a decent solution if you can tolerate a minimum
    middle ring of 38T for Shimano or 39T for Campag. Inner ring can go down
    to 24T.

    ~PB


    There is an alternative - Stronglight make the impact triple - designed fro
    111mm bottom bracket, sensible rings available - 26,36,46 and 28,38,48,
    24,34,46 or custom to choice, lowest inside ring is 24. Avaiable from
    www.spacycles.co.uk for £38

    HTH
    Julia

  5. Pete A said:

    Have fitted 110 bb - bike shop said this would give the best
    chain line possible, although it is still not good.

    Your mechanic is going by the book, but not using his loaf. Those cranks
    were generally specced with a 110 or 113mm bottom brackets, the 110 being
    for frames with conventional frame tubes, and 113 for oversized. However,
    those specs apply to bikes with a 135mm rear end. A 107mm would be a better
    choice, but as I said, 110 isn't bad.

    Quoted message said:

    Think problem is is that is must have originally been a 10 speed setup,
    and spacing at rear is not ideal for 7 speed freewheel. Wheel looks quite
    dished to me. Also, when I bought it it had been converted to a single
    speed setup, so the spacing on the rear wheel axle had to be changed.
    Bloke in bike shop says that this era of bike was never designed to have
    a triple chainset fitted, but I would have thought it would be possible


    to fit

    Quoted message said:

    a triple to any bike, perhaps Im wrong ?

    Older Galaxies didn't come with triples, but their contemporaries did, and
    there's nothing materially different between your Galaxy and more modern
    bikes that come with triples fitted as standard.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, have thought of fitting a 113bb, but would this move the inner ring
    out a full 3mm more ? If so, and if the chain line is still possible,


    then I

    Quoted message said:

    may have to do this.

    The bottom bracket isn't the problem. If your front derailleur is hitting
    the chainstay, _you_have_the_wrong_front_derailleur_.

    Quoted message said:

    Alternatively I thought I may look for a standard road triple
    chainset - this would allow me to move the front mech higher
    up the frame & also solving problem (wanted lowish gearing
    cos I want to do fully loaded touring at some point on bike).

    If you want to go touring, keep your compact triple. A new road crankset
    will probably need a new bottom bracket to match. If you want a higher top
    gear, buy a bigger big chainring for the cranks you have. Rings as big as
    50 teeth are widely available. But don't replace the cranks to accommodate
    your front derailleur. Derailleurs are cheap, while cranks are not.

    James Thomson

  6. JBB said:

    There is an alternative - Stronglight make the impact triple -

    A quibble: Sugino make the Impact triple. Stronglight just sell it.

    James Thomson

  7. David Martin said:
    Quoted message said:

    I would have thought so too. I fitted a Campag road triple and 130mm
    wheel to my 1980's Raleigh that was designed for a double. Works
    well enough.

    JPEGS!

    130mm wheel? most wheels are around the 650mm size..

    Nah, they're boring. My other wheel's a 100mm.

    ~PB

  8. Pete Biggs said:
    Pete A said:

    Thanks for comments Pete.

    Have fitted 110 bb - bike shop said this would give the best chain
    line possible, although it is still not good. Think problem is is that
    is must have originally been a 10 speed setup, and spacing at rear is
    not ideal for 7 speed freewheel. Wheel looks quite dished to me. Also,
    when I bought it it had been converted to a single speed setup, so the
    spacing on the rear wheel axle had to be changed. Bloke in bike shop
    says that this era of bike was never designed to have a triple
    chainset fitted, but I would have thought it would be possible to fit
    a triple to any bike, perhaps Im wrong ?

    I would have thought so too. I fitted a Campag road triple and 130mm
    wheel to my 1980's Raleigh that was designed for a double. Works well
    enough.

    My 1980s Raleigh has been retro fitted with a 1980s Deore triple
    chainset and modern 105 triple front mech. 122.5mm BB, no problems at
    all. This machine came with a double and 6 speed block. It got new
    wheels with 6 speed cassette, then 8 speed cassette (on the same freehub
    body) then the triple chainset. Along the way the frame was respaced for
    the new wheels.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.