update on Tyler's site

Just read the full diary entry. He sure comes across like a crook,
doesn't he? All that stuff about his family, how he's working closely
with his coach, how he went on his own dime and helped Phonak win their
CAS case, etc., it's clearly a smokescreen for his guilt. It's no
wonder that a trained legal eye like Lafferty can see through him and
be so assured he's guilty, despite only the most limited amount of
information on the case having been released.

It's also clear that when you compare Tyler's crediblity to DeCanio's,
that DeCanio clearly comes out on top. I'm deferring to Lafferty's
assessment here, of course. It takes a keen mind to see the vastly
superior crediblity of DeCanio, and not get drawn in by minor details,
such as publically admitting EPO use, posting of rambling, wigged-out
tomes, freaky eBay auctions, and a seeming lack of any normal
relationships with friends or companions. Bravo, Brian.

Zub

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just read the full diary entry. He sure comes across like a crook,
doesn't he? All that stuff about his family, how he's working closely
with his coach, how he went on his own dime and helped Phonak win their
CAS case, etc., it's clearly a smokescreen for his guilt. It's no
wonder that a trained legal eye like Lafferty can see through him and
be so assured he's guilty, despite only the most limited amount of
information on the case having been released.

Funny, what I got out of it is a guy who doesn't know how to charge a car
battery.

JF

<[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just read the full diary entry. He sure comes across like a crook,
doesn't he? All that stuff about his family, how he's working closely
with his coach, how he went on his own dime and helped Phonak win their
CAS case, etc., it's clearly a smokescreen for his guilt. It's no
wonder that a trained legal eye like Lafferty can see through him and
be so assured he's guilty, despite only the most limited amount of
information on the case having been released.

It's also clear that when you compare Tyler's crediblity to DeCanio's,
that DeCanio clearly comes out on top. I'm deferring to Lafferty's
assessment here, of course. It takes a keen mind to see the vastly
superior crediblity of DeCanio, and not get drawn in by minor details,
such as publically admitting EPO use, posting of rambling, wigged-out
tomes, freaky eBay auctions, and a seeming lack of any normal
relationships with friends or companions. Bravo, Brian.

Zub

Hey Brian !

Where did you rent this claque ?? :-)
--
Bonne route,

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Just read the full diary entry. He sure comes across like a crook,
doesn't he? All that stuff about his family, how he's working closely
with his coach, how he went on his own dime and helped Phonak win their
CAS case, etc., it's clearly a smokescreen for his guilt. It's no
wonder that a trained legal eye like Lafferty can see through him and
be so assured he's guilty, despite only the most limited amount of
information on the case having been released.

It's also clear that when you compare Tyler's crediblity to DeCanio's,
that DeCanio clearly comes out on top. I'm deferring to Lafferty's
assessment here, of course. It takes a keen mind to see the vastly
superior crediblity of DeCanio, and not get drawn in by minor details,
such as publically admitting EPO use, posting of rambling, wigged-out
tomes, freaky eBay auctions, and a seeming lack of any normal
relationships with friends or companions. Bravo, Brian.

Zub

Hey Brian !

Where did you rent this claque ?? :-)
--
Bonne route,

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

They're free inside the rbr critical thinking box. ;-)

B Lafferty said:

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It's no
wonder that a trained legal eye like Lafferty can see through him and
be so assured he's guilty, despite only the most limited amount of
information on the case having been released.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Hey Brian !

Where did you rent this claque ?? :-)

Quoted message said:

They're free inside the rbr critical thinking box. ;-)

Dumbass,

I had to laugh too. In my quest for quality TV viewing, I watched American Idol
last night. The video showed Simon saying certain things to a rejected
candidate in the audition room, and then following it, the video showed the
candidate's interpretation of what they believed Simon had said. It was
decidedly amusing.

Given that, and your questions to someone else about the jury system, how do you
feel about the witness system? LOL