Update - JMW vs David (Oz)

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

Quoted message said:

I have staff examining his past, his
history in newsgroups, including background checks. I have engaged a lawyer
here and also another lawyer through my companie's branch office in the USA.

Your sexual interludes do not interest us...unless you're going to be
posting mpegs. Perhaps you could start a website: www.lawyersex.com.au?

Quoted message said:

I have already uncovered certain information which I would not stoop to his
level by revealing to a newsgroup as I don't get perverse satisfaction from
embarrassing people.

Of course you would!

Quoted message said:

However I will take appropriate action to the
appropriate authorities.

You'll purchase a new bottle of lube at ClubX?

Quoted message said:

JMW's sordid practices hopefully will come to an
end.

<butthead laugh>Come...end...huh huh huh huh </butthead laugh>

Is this the way we're supposed to write things in these threads? I'm a
bit of a neophyte when it comes to these trolling topics, but I *think*
I've got the dynamic down. I've included an uneducated legal statement,
a bluff call, and several references to the OPs sex life. That just
about covers the requirements, yes?

Cheers,

Ari

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:36:11 +0800, spodosaurus

spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

If that which David wrote is untrue then it could be potentially
libellous.

Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.

Whatever has been said about John Williams, would have to be weighed
against that which he has committed to the written word about scores
of other people using this and other newsgroups. As he sows so must he
reap!

HTH!

Have a great weekend Ari and a happy and successful New Year - I
intend to! ;o)

JRH said:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:36:11 +0800, spodosaurus

spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

If that which David wrote is untrue then it could be potentially
libellous.

Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.

Whatever has been said about John Williams, would have to be weighed
against that which he has committed to the written word about scores
of other people using this and other newsgroups. As he sows so must he
reap!

HTH!

Have a great weekend Ari and a happy and successful New Year - I
intend to! ;o)

Thanks! Hopefully this semi-remission (those aren't the right words,
it's really just a response to a treatment variation I suggested after
others failed) brought on by these evil horrible anabolic steroids will
continue and this next year will be much better than this previous one :-)

Ari

--
spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:04:44 +0800, spodosaurus

spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

JRH said:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:36:11 +0800, spodosaurus

spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David wrote:

>JMW has
>continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
>unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

If that which David wrote is untrue then it could be potentially
libellous.

Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.

Whatever has been said about John Williams, would have to be weighed
against that which he has committed to the written word about scores
of other people using this and other newsgroups. As he sows so must he
reap!

HTH!

Have a great weekend Ari and a happy and successful New Year - I
intend to! ;o)

Thanks! Hopefully this semi-remission (those aren't the right words,
it's really just a response to a treatment variation I suggested after
others failed) brought on by these evil horrible anabolic steroids will
continue and this next year will be much better than this previous one :-)

Fingers crossed Ari and I hope things continue to improve for you. ;o)

HNY!

Quoted message said:

Fingers crossed Ari and I hope things continue to improve for you.>

I hope the piece of [censored] croaks off.

Quoted message said:

Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.>

Right, and internet words do not qualify. The problem is proving who
actually typed the offensive words, it could be JMW, or anyone in his
home. Internet lawsuits go nowhere.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.>

Right, and internet words do not qualify. The problem is proving who
actually typed the offensive words, it could be JMW, or anyone in his
home. Internet lawsuits go nowhere.

I happen to be a professional 'troll enabler' - do you have any use for my
services? My rates are reasonable and the service is only available to bona
fide trolls.

In article <[email hidden]>,

spodosaurus spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

--
Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

WillBrink said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

spodosaurus spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

Indeed, we have seen this kind of thing many times. Kinda interesting
if it is true but so far I have yet to see a case where such internet
threats are actually true.

--
Is this thing on?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Joe Humble said:

WillBrink said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

spodosaurus spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David wrote:
> JMW has
> continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
> unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

Indeed, we have seen this kind of thing many times. Kinda interesting
if it is true but so far I have yet to see a case where such internet
threats are actually true.

Well Mike, how many internet threats have we seen here on MFW? How
manyhave come true? In all my years on mfw, I have yet to see even one
come true. Hell, I recall waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back to mfw regulars who
hated each other and threats all over about how they were going to kick
the [censored] out of each other. The amazing thing about this one is they
lived miles from each other! Never happened. Another I recall was
between Bill Roberts and Dan Duchaine. We all know how that turned
out....You reallylook sad when you have to threaten people on a news
group.

--
Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

Ari spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has continuously misused his position as a public
officer with actions unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote
above slander or libel?

It's opinion. And a rather accurate one, in /my/ opinion.

Quoted message said:

I always get those two confused.

I suspect that's a lie. Rather than confusion, it was a literary
device. An attempt at humor or, more likely, sarcasm. Much like your -
what I believe is obviously - insincere "Cheers" end to your posts.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

WillBrink said:

He's anything if not 100% predictable.

That's not what you meant to write.

And, yes, if anything, you're predictable, Will. Or, hey, you're
nothing if not predictable. :o)

Quoted message said:

I just killfile such a moron.

Speaking as an authority on morons?

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

WillBrink said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

spodosaurus spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David said:

JMW has
continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

Do you know what's really interesting about all David's threats?
Aside from putting his anonymous email address on my web page as one
that I find convenient to killfile, every reference I have made about
him has been *on Usenet*, and anything written has been derived
directly from messages *he posted on Usenet*. I'm not sure how he
thinks his threats of real-world harassment won't rebound into his own
real-world existence.

Some people like to huff and puff about how rich and powerful they
are. But if someone like that engages in extortionate behavior, he
may really need to retain lawyers to protect against defamation suits
filed against him and his "multi-million dollar family-owned company."

WillBrink said:

Well Mike, how many internet threats have we seen here on MFW? How
many have come true? In all my years on mfw, I have yet to see even one
come true.

Irony is a funny thing, though. I've seen one come true... in a way.
Well, a mirror actually. Yet it was Mother Nature who intervened.

Quoted message said:

Hell, I recall waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back to mfw regulars who
hated each other and threats all over about how they were going to kick
the [censored] out of each other. The amazing thing about this one is they
lived miles from each other! Never happened. Another I recall was
between Bill Roberts and Dan Duchaine. We all know how that turned
out....

Yes, Duchaine is dead. How's Bill Roberts?

Quoted message said:

You reallylook sad when you have to threaten people on a news
group.

What do you look like if you insult their music preferences?

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

WillBrink said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

spodosaurus spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com said:

David wrote:
> JMW has
> continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
> unbecoming to an officer of the law.

Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

Do you know what's really interesting about all David's threats?
Aside from putting his anonymous email address on my web page as one
that I find convenient to killfile, every reference I have made about
him has been *on Usenet*, and anything written has been derived
directly from messages *he posted on Usenet*. I'm not sure how he
thinks his threats of real-world harassment won't rebound into his own
real-world existence.

It's all very funny and sad, but this is not the first time he was a
clueless idiot nor will it be the last.

Quoted message said:

Some people like to huff and puff about how rich and powerful they
are. But if someone like that engages in extortionate behavior, he
may really need to retain lawyers to protect against defamation suits
filed against him and his "multi-million dollar family-owned company."

Nothing shows such a lack of character and desperation then people that
have to resort to the internet threat. Pitiful. Prepare to defend
yourself John! LOL.

--
Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

WillBrink said:

He's anything if not 100% predictable.

That's not what you meant to write.

And, yes, if anything, you're predictable, Will. Or, hey, you're
nothing if not predictable. :o)

Quoted message said:

I just killfile such a moron.

Speaking as an authority on morons?

Ha ha! Do ya think Brinks qualifies as a 'troll enabler'? (he might only be
a 'little' person but he sure has a big mouth!)

"WillBrink" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

WillBrink said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
spodosaurus <spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote:

> David wrote:
> > JMW has
> > continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
> > unbecoming to an officer of the law.
>
> Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above
> slander
> or libel? I always get those two confused.

I'm sure JMW is shaking in his boots that some dirt bag troll is after
him. David can dish it out, but can't take it. He turns into a typical
[censored] and posts internet threats. Bwa ha ha.

He's anything if not 100% predictable. Perhaps his son the pretend
doctor will get on a plane and come kick JMW's ass. Bwa ha ha ha!

Keep up the good work JMW!!! Me, I just killfile such a moron.

Do you know what's really interesting about all David's threats?
Aside from putting his anonymous email address on my web page as one
that I find convenient to killfile, every reference I have made about
him has been *on Usenet*, and anything written has been derived
directly from messages *he posted on Usenet*. I'm not sure how he
thinks his threats of real-world harassment won't rebound into his own
real-world existence.

It's all very funny and sad, but this is not the first time he was a
clueless idiot nor will it be the last.

Quoted message said:

Some people like to huff and puff about how rich and powerful they
are. But if someone like that engages in extortionate behavior, he
may really need to retain lawyers to protect against defamation suits
filed against him and his "multi-million dollar family-owned company."

Nothing shows such a lack of character and desperation then people that
have to resort to the internet threat. Pitiful. Prepare to defend
yourself John! LOL.

Trailer Trash
http://blog.bioethics.net/2005/07/short-people-have-no-reason-to-live.html
http://ubersite.com/m/20881

David said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

WillBrink said:

He's anything if not 100% predictable.

That's not what you meant to write.

And, yes, if anything, you're predictable, Will. Or,
hey, you're nothing if not predictable. :o)

Quoted message said:

I just killfile such a moron.

Speaking as an authority on morons?

Ha ha! Do ya think Brinks qualifies as a 'troll enabler'?
(he might only be a 'little' person but he sure has a big
mouth!)

I'll refrain from commenting directly on that area as Charles has
warned me that there's a song and dance with my name on it if I
continue in my troll-like behavior. I'M NOT HAVIN' ANY OF THAT!

But, yeah, I will say that I pay careful attention to posts where
people call other people mooooooooorons! It's just the best feeling to
see they've made a mistake of their own as they criticize others.

Suh-WEEET!!!!

David, is it 2006 there yet? HAPPY NEW YEAR!

It's still 2005 here. :o) Yes, I'm living in the past.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

WillBrink <[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip a bunch>

Okay, this is all very nit-picky, however Brink seems to enjoy calling
people idiots and morons.

Ahem.

I'll have to scream to get through any possible killfile. Excuse me.

HEY, BRINK, YOU DUMB ASS! MAYBE YOU WOULDN'T LOOK LIKE SUCH AN IDIOT
IF YOU WOULD USE THAN INSTEAD OF THEN. HOW ABOUT THAT, DUMB ASS?!

Quoted message said:

It's all very funny and sad, but this is not the first time he was a
clueless idiot nor will it be the last.

^^^^^^^^^^^^

Quoted message said:

Nothing shows such a lack of character and desperation
then people that have to resort to the internet threat.

^^^^^^

Quoted message said:

Pitiful.

Brink certainly is.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/