UK and Europe · Public discussion

unfortunately "lycra louts" *do* exist :(

Started by Mr R@T \ -Lsqco · · Last activity · 6 posts · 914 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 February 2003
Last activity
13 February 2003
Original author
Mr R@T \ -Lsqco
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
914
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A few days ago I was riding home from work. One part of the route is a non-segregated shared-use
    path by the Thames, on which the tarmac is in a bad state of repair.

    I was proceeding along this at about 16mph - this being as fast as I felt was a safe speed due to
    the amount of potholes at this part of the path, and the presence of an old granny-lady who was
    walking along on the opposite side of the path (nearest to the river)

    Behind me was a chap on a decent road bike - wearing lid, racers' jacket, b*bt*ghts. Obviously a
    "Real Cyclist" - I would expect this chap may even have won a trophy or two!

    But he obviously considered 16mph *far too slow* - and decided to overtake me at speed so he could
    get ahead on to a better bit of the path, nearly running straight into the granny and having to
    swerve sharply to avoid coming off!

    Isn't this just *loutish behaviour?* The old lady looked quite intimidated, and had there been a
    collision at worst one or both of them could have ended up in the cold, deep and filthy river; at
    the least they would both have had a painful crash and he would have bent his forks and front wheel.
    There's a good reason why British Waterways warn cyclists to be careful on shared paths via
    riverbanks - and *not* to try and "race" other cyclists!

    Furthermore he didn't gain *that* much ground on me (following in a street-converted MTB [semi-slick
    tyres, rack etc] with loaded panniers), for the risk he took. And he if he was training (hence the
    big hurry) he could have gone just 2 miles further into S.Oxfordshire onto an open road where he
    could go as fast as he pleased without grannies "in his way" (after all, surely she has a right too
    for a walk by the river?(

    We moan (rightly) at cagers, but it seems some cyclists are just as bad with their "me first"
    personality. Are some people just *incapable* of sharing a community resource (such as a riverside
    path) these days?

    Alex

  2. Mr R@t \(2.3 zulu-alpha\) comms room new build said:

    A few days ago I was riding home from work. One part of the route is a non-segregated shared-use
    path by the Thames, on which the tarmac is in a bad state of repair.

    Bad bad boy. Keep clear of sh*r*d *s* p*ths!

    Of course Lycra louts exist. They are as representative of typical cyclists as minicab drivers are
    representative of typical drivers.

    I hope you slowed down and asked the old dear if she was alright, to restore her faith in cyclists.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  3. In "]news:[email hidden], Just zis Guy, you know?
    <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:


    Bad bad boy. Keep clear of sh*r*d *s* p*ths!


    I normally *do* (especially the really dodgy ones in the town centre) but this part is usually
    genuinely quicker (and safer) than the roads.

    Quoted message said:

    I hope you slowed down and asked the old dear if she was alright, to restore her faith in
    cyclists.

    I have to admit I didn't 🙁 - I feared she would only think I was taking the [censored], or that we *both*
    had hatched up a ploy to frighten her and then nick her handbag for heroin money. (there have been
    several bag snatches by scally cyclists in that area). This *is* Reading after all....

    Alex

  4. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Of course Lycra louts exist.

    Every time I hear the term "Lycra Louts" the image that comes to mind is not one of inconsiderate
    cyclists but of a mob clad in leg warmers and multi coloured leotards fresh from their aerobics
    session, rampaging down the street, shouting and swigging from beer bottles.

    Should I see a doctor? ;-)

    Have fun!

    Graeme

  5. Mr [email hidden] wrote

    Quoted message said:

    We moan (rightly) at cagers, but it seems some cyclists are just as bad with their "me first"
    personality. Are some people just *incapable* of sharing a community resource (such as a riverside
    path) these days?

    Sadly it's true: you know that "moral high-ground" that some cyclists like to inhabit (PCEOC)
    regarding environment, pollution and stuff? We go to to realise that the humble pedestrian lives
    further up the hill - unless they've just parked-up their 4x4, in which case they are still enemy
    combatants and are fair game.

  6. "Graeme Dods" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Every time I hear the term "Lycra Louts" the image that comes to mind is not one of inconsiderate
    cyclists but of a mob clad in leg warmers and multi coloured leotards fresh from their aerobics
    session, rampaging down the street, shouting and swigging from beer bottles.

    Should I see a doctor? ;-)

    No -- but you should avoid these types. They are fit b*stards, you know!!

    T

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.