General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

unexpected shoe quandry

Started by Chris Smith · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,319 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 September 2003
Last activity
13 September 2003
Original author
Chris Smith
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,319
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am planning to run a marathon two weeks from now in a medium-worn pair of NB763s, a proven
    marathon shoe for me. Just recently, I've begun doing some shorter to medium-distance runs in a new
    pair of NB831s, which are a few ounces lighter than the 763s. Not surprisingly, I feel a little
    faster in the lighter shoes, which appear to have significantly less heel buildup in construction. I
    know the dictum--nothing new on marathon day, and I am sort of gritting my teeth about this one and
    planning to stick with the 763s despite the temptation to go lighter. My longest possible run in the
    new shoes before the marathon would be 12 miles. The fit and running comfort of the new shoes seems
    fine. Anyone care to talk me out of my conservative approach and argue for taking a shot on the new
    shoes? I am more time-goal oriented this race than in the past, so ounces could matter over the long
    haul I guess.

    Chris

  2. 1). you'll probably make 324,000 strides/steps in the marathon. why do that in a heavier shoe?

    2). heck, you've done 12 miles in the shoe and it was fine, it's not a flat, there's no basis to
    assume the shoe is not spec'ed for 24 miles.

    3). this entire question is silly, and if you honestly ask me both of those shoes are losers,
    complete garbage and i would not walk a block in those clunkers! (just having some fun...hee hee).

    Andrew..

  3. "Chris Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am planning to run a marathon two weeks from now in a medium-worn pair of NB763s, a proven
    marathon shoe for me. Just recently, I've begun doing some shorter to medium-distance runs in a
    new pair of NB831s, which are a few ounces lighter than the 763s. Not surprisingly, I feel a
    little faster in the lighter shoes, which appear to have significantly less heel buildup in
    construction. I know the dictum--nothing new on marathon day, and I am sort of gritting my teeth
    about this one and planning to stick with the 763s despite the temptation to go lighter. My
    longest possible run in the new shoes before the marathon would be 12 miles. The fit and running
    comfort of the new shoes seems fine. Anyone care to talk me out of my conservative approach and
    argue for taking a shot on the new shoes? I am more time-goal oriented this race than in the past,
    so ounces could matter over the long haul I guess.

    I don't want to give advice in case it goes wrong for you. What I would say was that if I were in
    your position, I would go for it. If I had no probs running a 12 miler, I don't see why I would
    suffer over 26 miles. If you are really time oriented then it may well be worth the minor risk.

  4. What I'd do is get another new pair of the *old reliables*--the NB 763--and run some short to medium
    runs in them, to get 20 to 30 miles in them, before the marathon. A lighter shoe is not always best
    in a marathon, especially if you're a middle or back of the pack runner, or someone who is other
    than a neutral/efficient runner. Stride and foot plant inefficiencies that are minimal in shorter
    races (and even half marathons) can come up and bite you in a marathon, and if this race is
    especially important (personal goals or BQ chance), don't mess up your chances with untried shoes!

    Just my two cents--

    Jean in VA

    "Globaldisc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    1). you'll probably make 324,000 strides/steps in the marathon. why do


    that in

    Quoted message said:

    a heavier shoe?

    2). heck, you've done 12 miles in the shoe and it was fine, it's not a


    flat,

    Quoted message said:

    there's no basis to assume the shoe is not spec'ed for 24 miles.

    3). this entire question is silly, and if you honestly ask me both of


    those

    Quoted message said:

    shoes are losers, complete garbage and i would not walk a block in those clunkers! (just having
    some fun...hee hee).

    Andrew..

  5. Thanks for that thoughtful reply. In effect, your solution is what I've done. My newest of three
    pairs of NB763s currently in my house doesn't have THAT much mileage on it, probably only 125 miles
    at most. I'm putting no more miles on them before the race, using the older 763s and a run or two in
    the new 831s just for fun. You've helped me focus on the potential problems I could encounter late
    in the marathon from the thousands of fractionally different landings I certainly have in the
    831s--thanks, Jean. I'll stick with the tried and true and wait to take a chance with the 831s in a
    half-marathon later in the year.

    Oh, if only a BQ time were within my goal-set! No, merely trying to get to 4 hours for the first
    time, at least as a stretch goal for this race. I think my training is sufficient, now I just need
    to get my mind right, as the warden said in Cool Hand Luke.

    Chris

    Jean S. Barto said:

    What I'd do is get another new pair of the *old reliables*--the NB 763--and run some short to
    medium runs in them, to get 20 to 30 miles in them, before the marathon. A lighter shoe is not
    always best in a marathon, especially if you're a middle or back of the pack runner, or someone
    who is other than a neutral/efficient runner. Stride and foot plant inefficiencies that are
    minimal in shorter races (and even half marathons) can come up and bite you in a marathon, and if
    this race is especially important (personal goals or BQ chance), don't mess up your chances with
    untried shoes!

    Just my two cents--

    Jean in VA

    "Globaldisc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    1). you'll probably make 324,000 strides/steps in the marathon. why do


    that in

    Quoted message said:

    a heavier shoe?

    2). heck, you've done 12 miles in the shoe and it was fine, it's not a


    flat,

    Quoted message said:

    there's no basis to assume the shoe is not spec'ed for 24 miles.

    3). this entire question is silly, and if you honestly ask me both of


    those

    Quoted message said:

    shoes are losers, complete garbage and i would not walk a block in those clunkers! (just having
    some fun...hee hee).

    Andrew..

  6. Glad I could help, Chtis--let us know how your marathon goes, and especially how your feet/legs held
    up the last 8 miles or so!

    Jean in VA (hoping that the warm weather today stays around!)

    "Chris Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for that thoughtful reply. In effect, your solution is what I've


    done. My

    Quoted message said:

    newest of three pairs of NB763s currently in my house doesn't have THAT


    much

    Quoted message said:

    mileage on it, probably only 125 miles at most. I'm putting no more miles


    on

    Quoted message said:

    them before the race, using the older 763s and a run or two in the new


    831s just

    Quoted message said:

    for fun. You've helped me focus on the potential problems I could


    encounter late

    Quoted message said:

    in the marathon from the thousands of fractionally different landings I certainly have in the
    831s--thanks, Jean. I'll stick with the tried and


    true and

    Quoted message said:

    wait to take a chance with the 831s in a half-marathon later in the year.

    Oh, if only a BQ time were within my goal-set! No, merely trying to get to


    4

    Quoted message said:

    hours for the first time, at least as a stretch goal for this race. I


    think my

    Quoted message said:

    training is sufficient, now I just need to get my mind right, as the


    warden said

    Quoted message said:

    in Cool Hand Luke.

    Chris

    Jean S. Barto said:

    What I'd do is get another new pair of the *old reliables*--the NB


    763--and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    run some short to medium runs in them, to get 20 to 30 miles in them,


    before

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the marathon. A lighter shoe is not always best in a marathon,


    especially

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    if you're a middle or back of the pack runner, or someone who is other


    than

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a neutral/efficient runner. Stride and foot plant inefficiencies that


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    minimal in shorter races (and even half marathons) can come up and bite


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in a marathon, and if this race is especially important (personal goals


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    BQ chance), don't mess up your chances with untried shoes!

    Just my two cents--

    Jean in VA

    "Globaldisc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    1). you'll probably make 324,000 strides/steps in the marathon. why do


    that in

    Quoted message said:

    a heavier shoe?

    2). heck, you've done 12 miles in the shoe and it was fine, it's not a


    flat,

    Quoted message said:

    there's no basis to assume the shoe is not spec'ed for 24 miles.

    3). this entire question is silly, and if you honestly ask me both of


    those

    Quoted message said:

    shoes are losers, complete garbage and i would not walk a block in


    those

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    clunkers! (just having some fun...hee hee).

    Andrew..

  7. Quoted message said:

    why do that in a heavier shoe?

    Why not? Your legs will never know the difference.

    Bill R.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.