UK and Europe · Public discussion

Underwater cycling?

Started by Bob · · Last activity · 12 posts · 864 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
17 September 2003
Last activity
30 September 2003
Original author
Bob
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
864
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just noticed this on their frontpage...

    Gave me a chuckle.

    Anyone willing to test the seal?

    Gave me a chuckle.

    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866. asp

  2. Bob' email hidden in said:

    Anyone willing to test the seal? Gave me a chuckle.
    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866. asp

    I believe Myra is the resident bog snorkler...

    --
    A hippy goes up to a burger bar and asks the vendor, "Make me one with everything"

    Stop sleeping to email me.

  3. On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:22:42 +0100 someone who may be Richard Bates
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866. asp

    I believe Myra is the resident bog snorkler...

    50 metres is a long way down to snorkel...

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked
    keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

  4. David Hansen email hidden in said:

    On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:22:42 +0100 someone who may be Richard Bates
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866. asp

    I believe Myra is the resident bog snorkler...

    50 metres is a long way down to snorkel...

    Good point. I calculate that a 50m snorkel of 2cm diameter would require a lung capacity of at least
    23 litres (and even then you'd be rebreathing a large amount of expired air), although that seems
    massive. (pi*r^2*5000)/1000 ??? Has my maths gone fundamentally wrong there???

    Love and hosepipe from Rich x

    --
    A hippy goes up to a burger bar and asks the vendor, "Make me one with everything"

    Stop sleeping to email me.

  5. Bob said:

    Just noticed this on their frontpage...

    Gave me a chuckle.

    Anyone willing to test the seal?

    Gave me a chuckle.


    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866.

    Quoted message said:

    asp

    Ah 50m! Based on the definitions used for watches that means not even splashproof

    Tony

    --
    "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything." Mark Twain

  6. Richard Bates said:

    Good point. I calculate that a 50m snorkel of 2cm diameter would require a lung capacity of at
    least 23 litres (and even then you'd be rebreathing a large amount of expired air), although that
    seems massive. (pi*r^2*5000)/1000 ??? Has my maths gone fundamentally wrong there???

    Love and hosepipe from Rich x

    Your maths is right, but incomplete. As depth increases so does pressure, for every 10m of water
    above you 1 atmosphere (bar in SCUBA speak) is added. Hence pressure @ 50m = 50/10 + 1 = 6 bar.

    Therefore you would have to use 6 times your normal effort to breath (ie pump the air up to ambient
    pressure) - an impossible feat. If you could, the total volume (at the surface which you inhaled)
    would be 6*23 = 138 litres. Of course to 'flush' the stale air would require shift only
    138/((6-1)/2) = 55.2 litres (at the surface).

    Also at that depth Nitrogen Narcosis becomes an issue.

    Finally to bring this back to the OP's subjectline, it has been done:

    perfectsoulutions.combeyondtheshore greet.asp

    Regards

    Alex (sometimes a scuba diver)

  7. In article said:


    perfectsoulutions.combeyondtheshore greet.asp

    That can't be good for the mechanics! I wonder what tractions like down there, as there's a lot more
    viscosity to get through.

    - Richard (ex diver)

    --
    _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at ntlworld dot com _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ Time is a
    one way street, _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ Except in the Twighlight Zone.

  8. In message <[email hidden]>, Richard Corfield
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    perfectsoulutions.combeyondtheshore greet.asp

    That can't be good for the mechanics! I wonder what tractions like down there, as there's a lot
    more viscosity to get through.


    Buoyancy is not your friend either. At Llanwrtyd Wells they fill the tyres with water and hand
    weights on the bike to get any traction at all. And that's in only a couple of metres of water!
    --
    Sue ];(🙂

  9. Sue said:


    Buoyancy is not your friend either. At Llanwrtyd Wells they fill the tyres with water and hand
    weights on the bike to get any traction at all. And that's in only a couple of metres of water!

    Water depth makes no difference to the boyancy of the bike so what works for 2m will work for 30m

    Tony

    --
    "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything." Mark Twain

  10. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sue said:


    Buoyancy is not your friend either. At Llanwrtyd Wells they fill the tyres with water and hand
    weights on the bike to get any traction at all. And that's in only a couple of metres of water!

    Water depth makes no difference to the boyancy of the bike so what works


    for

    Quoted message said:

    2m will work for 30m

    Hmm, depends on tyre pressure a bit. At 100m, definitely less buoyant. At 30m, many MTBs would be
    less buoyant.

    Generally speaking the deeper you get the less buoyant it will be.

    cheers, clive

  11. Clive George said:

    "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sue said:


    Buoyancy is not your friend either. At Llanwrtyd Wells they fill the tyres with water and hand
    weights on the bike to get any traction at all. And that's in only a couple of metres of water!

    Water depth makes no difference to the boyancy of the bike so what works for 2m will work for 30m

    Hmm, depends on tyre pressure a bit. At 100m, definitely less buoyant. At 30m, many MTBs would be
    less buoyant.

    Generally speaking the deeper you get the less buoyant it will be.

    Not when the tyres are filled with water as was stated above. And for these purposes the assumptions
    are either the frame tubes fill with water or are treated as incompressible to first order.

    The rider on the other hand will become less bouyant and have other problems riding at 100m (hence
    my choice of 30m) ;-)

    Tony

  12. "Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Just noticed this on their frontpage...

    Gave me a chuckle.

    Anyone willing to test the seal?

    Gave me a chuckle.

    cyclexpress.co.ukCompact Opticube 3LED Front Light 866. asp

    For anyone needing a rear LED light the same link has a 30% off offer on the Cateye LD600. One of
    the best LEDs on the market IME.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.