In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I use the cold gear line and really like it. You need something else on top to block the wind,
but as a wicking and insulating layer it's great.
Any idea how it stacks up against the myriad similar products on the market?
I would guess about the same as other "high performance underwear" products. It just happened to be
the first one I tried (after I heard an interview with the founder on the radio), and I liked it. I
haven't tried other brands because I just don't need that many sets of the stuff.
Quoted message said:The underarmor site is remarkably vague about what is so special about their stuff.
I found some reading somewhere which explained how the wicking action works, and it just has to do
with the number and size of fibers against your skin compared to the number on the outside. I
imagine any competent textile manufacturer can do the same thing.
I do like the fit of the Under Armor: its quite stretchy because of its high lycra/spandex content,
so it doesn't bag or develop wrinkles.
--
Dave Kerber Fight spam: remove the ns_ from the return address before replying!
REAL programmers write self-modifying code.