In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
the "Look" again"
Wonder what he meant by that?
I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
"Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
-tom
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Ullrich won't fall for the "Look" again?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 16 July 2004
- Last activity
- 17 July 2004
- Original author
- Tom Nakashima
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 417
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Tom Nakashima said:
In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
the "Look" again"
Wonder what he meant by that?
I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
"Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
-tom
Ullrich knows otherwise. -
Ullrich won't fall for the Look because he will be a
minute or two behind and won't be able to see it. -
Tom Nakashima said:
In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
the "Look" again"
Wonder what he meant by that?
I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
"Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
-tomIf its THAT look he was talking about there's not much he can do about
it. That was possibly the greatest display of "one-upsmanship" I've
ever seen in any sport. Jan looked like a deer in the headlights. -
"Krusty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tom Nakashima said:
In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
the "Look" again"
Wonder what he meant by that?
I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
"Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
-tomIf its THAT look he was talking about there's not much he can do about
it. That was possibly the greatest display of "one-upsmanship" I've
ever seen in any sport. Jan looked like a deer in the headlights.Ruth calling the home run he was about to hit is what it's often compared
to, so this wasn't a first, but certainly uncommon and impressive.--
Kovie
[email hidden] -
"Tom Nakashima" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
the "Look" again"
Wonder what he meant by that?
I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
"Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
-tomI don't think he was referring to "The Look". I think he was referring to
believing that Armstrong is suffering by the look on his face. Remember
Lance's bluff earlier in the stage? Jan has referred to it many times. He
even brought that up again before the tour to explain why Armstrong finished
fifth on Mt. Ventoux. He claimed Lance with bluffing again.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.