Road Cycling · Public discussion

Ullrich won't fall for the "Look" again?

Started by Tom Nakashima · · Last activity · 6 posts · 417 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 July 2004
Last activity
17 July 2004
Original author
Tom Nakashima
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
417
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
    the "Look" again"
    Wonder what he meant by that?
    I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
    "Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
    -tom

  2. Tom Nakashima said:

    In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
    the "Look" again"
    Wonder what he meant by that?
    I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
    "Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
    -tom


    Ullrich knows otherwise.

  3. Ullrich won't fall for the Look because he will be a
    minute or two behind and won't be able to see it.

  4. Tom Nakashima said:

    In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
    the "Look" again"
    Wonder what he meant by that?
    I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
    "Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
    -tom

    If its THAT look he was talking about there's not much he can do about
    it. That was possibly the greatest display of "one-upsmanship" I've
    ever seen in any sport. Jan looked like a deer in the headlights.

  5. "Krusty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Nakashima said:

    In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
    the "Look" again"
    Wonder what he meant by that?
    I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
    "Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
    -tom

    If its THAT look he was talking about there's not much he can do about
    it. That was possibly the greatest display of "one-upsmanship" I've
    ever seen in any sport. Jan looked like a deer in the headlights.

    Ruth calling the home run he was about to hit is what it's often compared
    to, so this wasn't a first, but certainly uncommon and impressive.

    --
    Kovie
    [email hidden]

  6. "Tom Nakashima" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In a recent commentary, it was mentioned; "Ullrich said he won't fall for
    the "Look" again"
    Wonder what he meant by that?
    I thought it was understood that LA was looking over the field and the
    "Look" wasn't directed towards Jan.
    -tom

    I don't think he was referring to "The Look". I think he was referring to
    believing that Armstrong is suffering by the look on his face. Remember
    Lance's bluff earlier in the stage? Jan has referred to it many times. He
    even brought that up again before the tour to explain why Armstrong finished
    fifth on Mt. Ventoux. He claimed Lance with bluffing again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.