Road Cycling · Public discussion

Ullrich OKs DNA Test

Started by Keith · · Last activity · 8 posts · 435 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 January 2007
Last activity
3 February 2007
Original author
Keith
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
435
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838

    Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which January Ullrich
    refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
    In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
    office January Ullrich communicated over its lawyers clearly that he
    is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. “The
    current publications are wrong. January Ullrich made its willing to
    cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
    office”, so its press speaker Michael long.

    The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
    personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
    publications. “It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
    January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
    intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
    sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
    right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ”,
    so long.
    "

  2. (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )

    So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    know that he is not guilty.

    Keith said:

    http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838

    Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which JanuaryUllrich
    refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
    In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
    office JanuaryUllrichcommunicated over its lawyers clearly that he
    is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. "The
    current publications are wrong. JanuaryUllrichmade its willing to
    cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
    office", so its press speaker Michael long.

    The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
    personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
    publications. "It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
    January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
    intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
    sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
    right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ",
    so long.
    "

  3. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:

    (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )

    So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    know that he is not guilty.

    It took this long to complete the negotiations.

    Quoted message said:
    Keith said:

    http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838

    Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which JanuaryUllrich
    refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
    In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
    office JanuaryUllrichcommunicated over its lawyers clearly that he
    is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. "The
    current publications are wrong. JanuaryUllrichmade its willing to
    cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
    office", so its press speaker Michael long.

    The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
    personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
    publications. "It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
    January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
    intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
    sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
    right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ",
    so long.
    "

    --
    Michael Press

  4. On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:

    (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )

    So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    know that he is not guilty.

    It took this long to complete the negotiations.

    What do you think the deal is ?

  5. "Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:

    (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )

    So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    know that he is not guilty.

    It took this long to complete the negotiations.

    What do you think the deal is ?

    He gets to deposit his DNA in [censored] Pound's mouth.

  6. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Keith said:

    On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:

    (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )

    So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    know that he is not guilty.

    It took this long to complete the negotiations.

    What do you think the deal is ?

    Do not know. Guessing that Der Jan rides again.

    --
    Michael Press

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
    >
    > So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
    > controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
    > know that he is not guilty.

    It took this long to complete the negotiations.

    What do you think the deal is ?

    Do not know. Guessing that Der Jan rides again.

    if it is found negative ? Well we'll soon know :
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb02news&from=rss

    'Ullrich gives DNA sample
    By Susan Westemeyer

    Jan Ullrich followed through on his promise to deliver a saliva sample
    for a DNA comparison to blood taken custody in the Operación Puerto
    investigation. His attorneys announced earlier this week that he was
    willing to travel to Germany to give a DNA sample, which was actually
    taken in Konstanz, Switzerland, on the German border.

    The sample will be turned over to prosecutors in Bonn, Germany, who
    must now await arrival of the blood bags from Spain, before the
    comparison test can be made.'

    Either he's bluffing and hopes for a non-match or he's totally stupid
    not to have submitted that test last July when T-Mobile asked him to
    take it...although with his race tactics over the years...

  8. "Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    if it is found negative ? Well we'll soon know :

    Keith, seeing the way that samples have been manipulated and information put
    in the wrong hands, would you trust YOUR DNA in the hands of someone that
    might find your DNA on the handle of a murder weapon?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.