Road Cycling · Public discussion

Ullrich 25 seconds back

Started by Michael · · Last activity · 40 posts · 1,391 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
4 July 2004
Last activity
6 July 2004
Original author
Michael
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,391
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

  2. First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8 mile time trial, with light mist in certain areas and some sharp turns.

    People trying to make a huge deal out of the prologue, need to get realistic about things.

    OK, if he loses the whole GC by 16 seconds, then it would be important.

    But my prediction is, whomever wins this whole shabang is going to do it with a 3-5 minute blowout of the opponents, not seconds like last year.

  3. Michael said:

    That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What year
    was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute gap on
    the peleton and were just allowed to get away? Resulted in
    Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing the Maillot
    Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally ripped it off
    Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.

  4. "Daremo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8
    mile time trial, with light mist in certain areas and some
    sharp turns.

    It's early, yes, but now he has to start thinking about
    where he's going to pick that back up because he knows he
    may lose a few more seconds in the TTT.

    The race isn't over, obviously, but as I said, this is not
    how Ullrich wanted to start.

    M.

  5. Daremo said:

    First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8
    mile time trial, with light mist in certain areas and some
    sharp turns.

    People trying to make a huge deal out of the prologue,
    need to get realistic about things.

    OK, if he loses the whole GC by 16 seconds, then it would
    be important.

    But my prediction is, whomever wins this whole shabang is
    going to do it with a 3-5 minute blowout of the opponents,
    not seconds like last year.

    As I've said before, that's time Jan has to make up. He'd be
    much better off if it were 2 or 3 seconds. This cushion is
    like money in the bank to Lance, as last year there was a
    crash that held him up and something like that happening
    again would be harrowing if he didn't have that time. It's
    nice to have, it's a drag if you have to make it up and then
    pile more time into your opponenet, where you'd like to be
    more even.

  6. Quoted message said:

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What year
    was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute gap on
    the peleton and were just allowed to get away? Resulted in
    Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing the Maillot
    Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally ripped it off
    Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.

    Yes, 2001. That will not be allowed to happen again. I was
    there; we had a dinner that night with one of the team
    support guys. They were most definitely not comfortable with
    what had gone on; in hindsight they regarded it as a serious
    tactical error. The problem is that sometimes, not too often
    but sometimes, the jersey makes the man. I believe there was
    some (although slight) fear that Simon might ride better
    than he was capable of; O'Grady wasn't considered such a big
    issue by the team, if I recall correctly. However, in
    looking at my notes, it appears that we (spectators/those
    who don't know any better) were more concerned about
    O'Grady, because he was someone we knew something about.

    Seems so long ago, and yet it really wasn't. Just 4 years.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  7. "Daremo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8
    mile time trial, with light mist in certain areas and some
    sharp turns.

    People trying to make a huge deal out of the prologue,
    need to get realistic about things.

    OK, if he loses the whole GC by 16 seconds, then it would
    be important.

    But my prediction is, whomever wins this whole shabang is
    going to do it with a 3-5 minute blowout of the opponents,
    not seconds like last year.

    Agreed. How silly to say that this is a big deal for Jan. It
    is nothing and the race is young to say the least.

    Curt

  8. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What
    year was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute
    gap on the peleton and were just allowed to get away?
    Resulted in Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing
    the Maillot Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally
    ripped it off Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.

    Yes, 2001. That will not be allowed to happen again. I was
    there; we had


    a

    Quoted message said:

    dinner that night with one of the team support guys. They
    were most definitely not comfortable with what had gone
    on; in hindsight they


    regarded

    Quoted message said:

    it as a serious tactical error. The problem is that
    sometimes, not too often but sometimes, the jersey makes
    the man. I believe there was some (although slight) fear
    that Simon might ride better than he was capable


    of;

    Quoted message said:

    O'Grady wasn't considered such a big issue by the team, if
    I recall correctly. However, in looking at my notes, it
    appears that we (spectators/those who don't know any
    better) were more concerned about O'Grady, because he was
    someone we knew something about.

    Seems so long ago, and yet it really wasn't. Just 4 years.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    You didn't mention the late Kivelev. Wasn't he in that
    huge break and wasn't he the last one to yield his
    advantage? I'm asking 'cuz I don't exactly recall. I seem
    to recall him being a threat well into the race ... longer
    even than Simon.

    Bob C.

  9. You guys are all missing the boat. Those seconds put
    pressure on Jan. He will have to make a move and Armstrong
    can just recline on his bike and draft all the way up the
    climbs. Short of a crash by Armstrong, it's all over now.
    Sucks that it's over so soon.

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael said:

    That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What year
    was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute gap on
    the peleton and were just allowed to get away? Resulted in
    Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing the Maillot
    Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally ripped it off
    Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.

  10. "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Daremo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8
    mile time trial, with light mist in certain areas and
    some sharp turns.

    It's early, yes, but now he has to start thinking about
    where he's going


    to

    Quoted message said:

    pick that back up because he knows he may lose a few more
    seconds in the TTT.

    The race isn't over, obviously, but as I said, this is not
    how Ullrich


    wanted

    Quoted message said:

    to start.

    M.

    Actually, it is precisely how he wants to start. I am sure
    he wishes Lance approached it the same way...Jan claims he
    put safety at the top of his priority list. Ullrich has not
    had a lot of bad falls in his career but he did lose plenty
    of racing after at least one tumble and this boy knows what
    he is doing considering his record here at the Tour, having
    never finished lower than second. Another point is that he
    often lost to riders he beat in the prolog so he knows
    precisely how important it is or isn't.

  11. "fstrnu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:_%%Fc.23271$a24.22076@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    You guys are all missing the boat. Those seconds put
    pressure on Jan. He will have to make a move and Armstrong
    can just recline on his bike and draft all the way up the
    climbs. Short of a crash by Armstrong, it's all over now.
    Sucks that it's over so soon.

    LOL. Look at how many times Ullrich has been beaten (by one
    place on GC!!!) by riders he beat in the prolog. Maybe he
    considers it a jinx to beat a favored rider. In 1998 when
    Ullrich was defending his '97 win he was beaten by Pantani,
    who was 181st out of 189 riders and 48 seconds back after
    the prolog. Ullrich was 6th in the prolog that year and beat
    everyone in the race but Pantani.

    The prolog is an early indicator of form. Most agree that
    this Tour will be won by the contender who hits form in the
    third week. Both LA and Jan had said that they wanted to
    arrive at this year's Tour a little under their peak. It
    looks like Jan did just that and got through the prolog as
    he expected.

  12. Agreed. If anything, Jan can prove that he knows how to
    lose. You can't predict Lance's future based on Jan's past.
    If anything, this supports that he's washed up. It's over.
    Don't murder the messenger. I'm happy he won, but would
    have preferred at least some thrill beforehand. Bummed out,
    for sure...

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "fstrnu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:_%%Fc.23271$a24.22076@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    You guys are all missing the boat. Those seconds put
    pressure on Jan.


    He

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    will have to make a move and Armstrong can just recline
    on his bike and draft all the way up the climbs. Short
    of a crash by Armstrong, it's


    all

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    over now. Sucks that it's over so soon.

    LOL. Look at how many times Ullrich has been beaten (by
    one place on


    GC!!!)

    Quoted message said:

    by riders he beat in the prolog. Maybe he considers it a
    jinx to beat a favored rider. In 1998 when Ullrich was
    defending his '97 win he was


    beaten

    Quoted message said:

    by Pantani, who was 181st out of 189 riders and 48 seconds
    back after the prolog. Ullrich was 6th in the prolog that
    year and beat everyone in the race but Pantani.

    The prolog is an early indicator of form. Most agree that
    this Tour will


    be

    Quoted message said:

    won by the contender who hits form in the third week. Both
    LA and Jan had said that they wanted to arrive at this
    year's Tour a little under their peak. It looks like Jan
    did just that and got through the prolog as he expected.

  13. Agreed. Jan knows exactly how to make 2nd! ROFL...

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    kc.rr.com...

    Quoted message said:


    "Daremo" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    First stage ......... gimme a break ..........

    He's only 16 back of Armstrong based on a whopping 3.8
    mile time


    trial,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with light mist in certain areas and some sharp turns.

    It's early, yes, but now he has to start thinking about
    where he's going


    to

    Quoted message said:

    pick that back up because he knows he may lose a few
    more seconds in the TTT.

    The race isn't over, obviously, but as I said, this is
    not how Ullrich


    wanted

    Quoted message said:

    to start.

    M.

    Actually, it is precisely how he wants to start. I am
    sure he wishes Lance approached it the same way...Jan
    claims he put safety at the top of his priority list.
    Ullrich has not had a lot of bad falls in his career but
    he did lose plenty of racing after at least one tumble
    and this boy knows


    what

    Quoted message said:

    he is doing considering his record here at the Tour,
    having never finished lower than second. Another point is
    that he often lost to riders he beat


    in

    Quoted message said:

    the prolog so he knows precisely how important it is
    or isn't.

  14. Quoted message said:

    Fifteen seconds is one quarter of the winning margin from
    last year, and IMHO, is not to be sneered at. Both LA and
    Jan pretend otherwise, and, as Lance is fond of saying,
    "anything can happen..."

    I have no doubt that Lance sees "15 seconds" as something
    more than symbolic. We've even seen him contest a few
    sprints lately... there may be times those finishing bonuses
    could be a very handy thing to have.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  15. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fifteen seconds is one quarter of the winning margin
    from last year, and IMHO, is not to be sneered at. Both
    LA and Jan pretend otherwise, and, as Lance is fond of
    saying, "anything can happen..."

    I have no doubt that Lance sees "15 seconds" as something
    more than symbolic. We've even seen him contest a few
    sprints lately... there may be times those finishing
    bonuses could be a very handy thing to have.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    That's right. It's early and it's 25 seconds. But Ullrich
    is going to have to wonder about how this race is going
    to shape up.

    Where else can he make it up? Historically, the only place
    he has beaten Armstrong is in the TTs, and only once. Last
    year, in the second TT, he took a minute from Armstrong, but
    not in the final TT, and not in this Prologue TT. He'll look
    to have a little better luck in a longer TT.

    Team TT? No chance. He'll lose a little time.

    The mountain stages? Of course, some time, Armstrong is
    going to crack in the mountains. It may happen this year,
    but his training shows that is highly unlikely. He's in
    terrific shape and has enormous confidence. Ullrich has no
    history of leaving Armstrong behind in the mountains.

    Yes, it's way early, but for Ullrich, 25 seconds looms
    large.

    Mike

  16. "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

    how the hell do you know how he wants to race? Dave

  17. "fstrnu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:_%%Fc.23271$a24.22076@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    You guys are all missing the boat. Those seconds put
    pressure on Jan. He will have to make a move and Armstrong
    can just recline on his bike and draft all the way up the
    climbs. Short of a crash by Armstrong, it's all over now.
    Sucks that it's over so soon.

    dude, go smoke some more crack Dave

  18. If you know so much, why don't you call the poor
    inexperienced Ullrich up and give him some tips?

    Jan is doing just dandy.

    "Michael" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    kc.rr.com...

    Quoted message said:

    That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

  19. Think I mentioned that in another post. Though it's good to
    have 15 seconds, the next battleground will be the TTT.

    fstrnu said:

    You guys are all missing the boat. Those seconds put
    pressure on Jan. He will have to make a move and Armstrong
    can just recline on his bike and draft all the way up the
    climbs. Short of a crash by Armstrong, it's all over now.
    Sucks that it's over so soon.

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael said:

    That's not the way he wants to start this race.

    Mike

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What year
    was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute gap on
    the peleton and were just allowed to get away? Resulted in
    Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing the Maillot
    Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally ripped it off
    Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.


  20. psycholist said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    not 25 down from his main competition, however. What year
    was it, 2001? where several riders had a 35 minute gap on
    the peleton and were just allowed to get away? Resulted
    in Stuart O'Grady, then Francios Simon wearing the
    Maillot Jaune for quite a while, until Lance finally
    ripped it off Francois' tired ol' body in the Pyrenees.

    Yes, 2001. That will not be allowed to happen again. I was
    there; we had

    a

    Quoted message said:

    dinner that night with one of the team support guys. They
    were most definitely not comfortable with what had gone
    on; in hindsight they

    regarded

    Quoted message said:

    it as a serious tactical error. The problem is that
    sometimes, not too often but sometimes, the jersey makes
    the man. I believe there was some (although slight) fear
    that Simon might ride better than he was capable

    of;

    Quoted message said:

    O'Grady wasn't considered such a big issue by the team, if
    I recall correctly. However, in looking at my notes, it
    appears that we (spectators/those who don't know any
    better) were more concerned about O'Grady, because he was
    someone we knew something about.

    Seems so long ago, and yet it really wasn't. Just 4 years.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    You didn't mention the late Kivelev. Wasn't he in that
    huge break and wasn't he the last one to yield his
    advantage? I'm asking 'cuz I don't exactly recall. I seem
    to recall him being a threat well into the race ... longer
    even than Simon.

    Bob C.

    Kivilev finished with a good placing, but it wasn't he who
    relieved Simon of the Maillot Jaune. Dangerous to let a
    ringer go like that, however.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.