[email hidden] (john) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
<lots of blather from anti-establishment types>
COMMENT:
Only John would post two quotes to bolster his case, and fail to
notice that they essentially make completely opposite and opposing
arguments. Here is one Kihura Nkuba, a clueless Ugandan quoted by
John:
Nkuba:
"According to government, measles was a threat to national interest,
claiming more than 40,000 lives every year (a statistic which is
laughable since most people who get measles stay at home and treat it
and the majority of sick people go to private clinics that do not keep
records this figure was of course trumped up). This of course is a
questionable statistic since the majority of deaths in Uganda are not
registered and few parents remember any measles death. No point in
registering a person once he has died. Forty thousand people are far
much less than those killed in Uganda annually due to the civil war,
dwarfs the figure for malaria, which kills a child every five second
and for which governments is happy to ignore.......The forcing of them
to take a vaccine against a disease they know to be harmless and which
they know how to cure in its harmful state was seen as government hell
bent on killing its own population for the benefit of commanding
whiteworld. All village people know that once you have recovered from
measles you will never catch it again, but here they were telling
people to vaccinate even those who have recovered from measles.
"--Kihura Nkuba 2003
COMMENT:
Notice that this Nkuba guy is claiming that natural measles is a
disease which Africans in Uganda "know to be harmless", and the 40,000
deaths a year statistically attributed to it, are "trumped up" because
few parents "remember any measles deaths."
Right. Got that? Now, right after this, John posts a quote by Dr. A.
Kalokerinos explaining how measles *vaccine* deaths in Africa don't
look like measles virus deaths. Why? Well, see, here's the secret that
Nkuba missed: it's because the vaccine measles virus pushes sick and
starving children over the edge of health, so they die of something
else that *isn't reported to be measles*:
Dr. Kalokerinos:
"It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through
Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving
children...They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of
those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they
developed as a result of being vaccinated. Kalokerinos, The
vaccination reduced
their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia,
gastro-enteritis, etcetera, or made their nutritional status worse and
they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible
infants left alive to get measles. It's one way to get good
statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they
literally did." --Dr Kalokerinos, M.D.
COMMENT:
My favorite part of this one is the part where Dr. Kalokerinos says
that in these sick African children "The vaccination reduced their
immune levels and acted like an infection." Well, there's no doubt
that measles vaccination is an infection, since measles vaccine virus
is an attenuated but live virus. Hellow? What horrible infection does
the good doctor Kalokerinos think the vaccine virus is "acting like",
we medical people wonder? Would it, possibly, be (gasp) natural
measles infection? That *same* natural measles infection which the
aformentioned Ugandan Nkuba tells us is *harmless* in these sick and
starving Africans, anyway--- as every African knows? But Dr.
Kalokerinos, we suppose, doesn't? Kalokerinos states without evidence
that "many" of these vaccinated kids, as a result of lower immunity
from infection by the live vaccine virus, got "septicaemia,
gastro-enteritis, etcetera, or made their nutritional status worse and
they died from malnutrition." Please remember, that according to Dr.
Kalokerinos, these are the same African kids who die on a continent
where Mr. Nkuba says measles death statistics must be "trumped up"
because statistics are untrustworthy, and "few parents remember any
measles death." Hmmm.
In short, if Mr. Nkuba's argument is valid that few measles death
*reports* in Africa actually should be trusted to mean few actual
measles *deaths* in Africa, then all of Dr. Kalokerinos' claims about
measles *vaccine* deaths in malnourished children, are subject to at
least an equal claim of being "trumped up" by Dr. Kalokerinos, in the
same way. Where are the reports that support Kalokerinos? No doubt,
Kalokerinos is telling us white man's fibs, similar to those we hear
about natural measles. Nkuba should talk to the doctor and give him
some good ethnic sensitivity training.
And conversely, if Dr. Kalokerinos' claims (for which he gives no
statistics) are actually valid about measles vaccine virus deaths
going unnoticed, as other causes of death in sick and malnourished
African children, then the same argument cannot fail to go in spades
in regards to deaths in Africa due to the natural measles disease,
also. In that case, it is Mr. Nkuba who is being naïve about measles
infection deaths in Africa. Not only that, but in that case, also Dr.
Kalokerinos must be a complete fool not to to realise that if the
attenuated virus in the vaccine really is knocking off malnourished
African children like flies, as he claims, that epidemics of the real
full strength virus (which is what these children are subject to if
NOT vaccinated) would not be far worse in this regard. And for just
the same reasons. Why are we supposed to believe one thing and not the
other?
And if both of these men are a few bricks shy of a load, then John the
local Dunce is a complete moron to post both of their arguments, and
fail to notice that not only do they disagree with each other's views
completely, but that in particular Kalokerinos' implied argument about
Africa (killer vaccine virus, pussycat natural virus) isn't very
consistant with itself, and thus isn't even good fantasy.
SBH