Road Cycling · Public discussion

UCI Suing Pound

Started by Geraard Spergen · · Last activity · 8 posts · 580 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
20 March 2008
Last activity
22 March 2008
Original author
Geraard Spergen
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
580
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.velonews.com/article/73501/uci-suing-[censored]-pound

    **********
    "Indeed, on many occasions, Mr. Pound has publicly questioned the extent
    of the UCI’s efforts in the fight against doping," the UCI said.
    **********
    This just gets crazier and crazier.

  2. Quoted message said:

    http://www.velonews.com/article/73501/uci-suing-[censored]-pound
    **********
    "Indeed, on many occasions, Mr. Pound has publicly questioned the
    extent of the UCI's efforts in the fight against doping,"
    the UCI said.
    **********
    This just gets crazier and crazier.

    Undeniably,Clearly,Insane - UCI

    ...the PR looks quite amateurish as well...

    Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

  3. (Michael Baldwin) said:


    ..the PR looks quite amateurish as well...

    Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

    dumbass,

    cycling people are morons when it comes to PR and can't see beyond
    their point of view.

    this is like the spanish pros staging a boycott after operation
    puerto.

    outsiders don't see cycling as being persecuted, they see a
    hypocritical and dirty sport that becomes defensive when challenged on
    the doping issue.

  4. On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Amit Ghosh <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    (Michael Baldwin) said:


    ..the PR looks quite amateurish as well...

    Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

    dumbass,

    cycling people are morons when it comes to PR and can't see beyond
    their point of view.

    this is like the spanish pros staging a boycott after operation
    puerto.

    outsiders don't see cycling as being persecuted, they see a
    hypocritical and dirty sport that becomes defensive when challenged on
    the doping issue.

    Actually not. The overwhelming majority of noncyclists and non-race-fans I know,
    and I know a lot more normal people than bike geeks, are surprised to hear that
    they all aren't doped to the gills and rightfully and deservedly so. They all
    are certain that they'd want to take something to do insane things like race
    2500 miles in three weeks and don't see any sort of moral aspect to it. They do
    see a weird and confusing approach to the doping issue that makes no sense.

    They don't see the sport as dirty, just incomprehensible. Which is true of
    almost all aspects of road racing, not just doping. What they do know and
    understand of doping is politics, which they mostly interpret in the same way
    that they understand other aspects of the relationship between France and the
    rest of the world. Because of the prominence of the TdF and France's centrality
    in doping this is all they know. I'll be interested to see what they think of
    the Van Impe incident.

    It is only the peripheral bike geek who rides the moral high horse. The rest of
    the world shrugs.

    Ron

  5. Amit Ghosh said:
    (Michael Baldwin) said:

    ..the PR looks quite amateurish as well...

    Quoted message said:

    Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

    dumbass,

    cycling people are morons when it comes to PR and can't see beyond
    their point of view.

    Two opinions in that sentence.

    Quoted message said:

    this is like the spanish pros staging a boycott after operation
    puerto.

    Or, you could say it's like the soccer players "connected with" Puerto
    not feeling the need to boycott.

    Quoted message said:

    outsiders don't see cycling as being persecuted, they see a
    hypocritical and dirty sport that becomes defensive when challenged on
    the doping issue.

    More opinions, showing bias.

    You haven't heard about the Mitchell Report? Lots of people became
    instant "insiders" when that came out <g>. Remember? Owners and
    management had a nice big share of blame for the doping problem in
    baseball placed squarely on their shoulders-- that means that many in
    the public understand "hypocrisy in major league baseball in regard to
    widespread use of prohibited performance-enhancing substances".

    Hypocrisy? Jesus Christ, just wait till Clemens and Bonds sit on their
    perches and sing!

    That will be entertaining but few "secrets" will be revealed
    (opinion); the public is already well aware of suspensions for drug
    use in (USA) football and baseball. "Outsiders" don't care about
    cycling in the first place, would be my opinion (or cyclists wouldn't
    get hassled on the road quite so much) but if they bothered to read up
    on what's going on, they would (opinion) quickly come to the
    understanding that cyclists are the whipping boys of the dope nazis.

    If you haven't noticed: Your people took a big hit with the Van Impe
    affair. Speaking of public opinion.

    Maybe that will help when it comes time to settle this lawsuit; Pound
    is an [censored] who rode roughshod where he pleased. Maybe he and his
    ilk will learn a little respect. If not, fear will do just fine
    (opinion).

    BTW, everything you post on this subject sounds bitter and naively--
    but meanly-- moralistic. So someone told you. --D-y

  6. Geraard Spergen said:

    http://www.velonews.com/article/73501/uci-suing-[censored]-pound

    **********
    "Indeed, on many occasions, Mr. Pound has publicly questioned the extent
    of the UCI's efforts in the fight against doping," the UCI said.
    **********
    This just gets crazier and crazier.

    Didn't think it was April 1st, yet.

  7. critposer said:
    Geraard Spergen said:

    http://www.velonews.com/article/73501/uci-suing-[censored]-pound

    Quoted message said:

    **********
    "Indeed, on many occasions, Mr. Pound has publicly questioned the extent
    of the UCI's efforts in the fight against doping," the UCI said.
    **********
    This just gets crazier and crazier.

    Didn't think it was April 1st, yet.

    I keep thinking "Who the hell do you cheer on in this one?" Think I'll
    just hope for a really bloody, bruising battle with all the dirty
    laundry out on the line. We KNOW Pound wont shut up.
    Bill C

  8. Geraard Spergen said:

    This just gets crazier and crazier.

    Its kind of funny, unless of course its your license fees which are being
    used to pay the lawyers.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.