Road Cycling · Public discussion

UCI shell game

Started by MagillaGorilla · · Last activity · 22 posts · 406 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 August 2006
Last activity
31 August 2006
Original author
MagillaGorilla
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
406
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. MagillaGorilla said:
    Quoted message said:

    You're doing what a lawyer would call court-shopping.
    With no positive test and just Basso's dog's name to
    go on, you still want the case to be referred to WADA
    even though it doesn't meet the standards for evidence
    to refer to WADA that have been previously agreed on.
    If Basso was smart enough not to have Fuentes sending
    him faxes like Haven's shopping list, then maybe he
    should get off. It remains to be seen if Ullrich and
    dumbass Pevenage were that crafty.

    I'm sure [censored] Pound wants it to be referred to WADA
    too. That proves nothing. [censored] Pound would have sent
    John Mark Karr to the chair first and let his next of kin
    appeal to CAS later.

    Ben
    Kill them all and let Decanio sort them out.

    Dumbass,

    You subpoena other witnesses including Fuentes. You get Fuentes's bank
    records and trace the money back to its origin. You ask Fuentes on the
    stand WHO that name stands for (and who the other names on the list
    stand for). You ask Fuentes who gave him $60,000 on such-and-such a
    date. And then it's up to the jury to believe it or not.

    Do you think the U.S. federal government and USADA asked softball
    questions about Barry Bonds and the track & field scandal? The feds got
    a guy in jail for contempt for failing to answer questions about Bonds.

    You obviously don't know anything about how to prosecute a case. Maybe
    you should join the Italian "prosecution" team.

    Dumbass,

    Those were the Feds, not WADA, that were after Bonds's trainer.
    Does WADA even have subpoena power?
    BTW, the Feds haven't brought drug charges against Bonds,
    though they might still bust him for lying and for tampering
    (paying off his ex-girlfriend). The Feds are interested in
    prosecuting drug trading and busting up steroid rings as the
    side effect, but they aren't actually prosecuting players for
    doping. The Spanish prosecutors can do what you ask,
    assuming they want to, but it seems they're also more
    interested in nailing doctors than users. If they turn up
    evidence, WADA can use it, but I don't think WADA can
    itself actually ask the questions you want to ask.

    Quoted message said:

    You ask Basso why he withdrew significant funds of money on
    such-and-such dates and then you check out his answer with other
    witnesses and receipts. How would Basso explain why he can't account
    for 60,000 Euros from April through June?

    Finally a question I can answer - Basso took the money out
    to send Elisa and me on a deluxe tropical beach vacation.
    Ivan's a cool guy.

    Ben
    happy to help


  2. Quoted message said:

    Finally a question I can answer - Basso took the money out
    to send Elisa and me on a deluxe tropical beach vacation.
    Ivan's a cool guy.

    Ben
    happy to help


    Yea Right dude, In your WET DREAMS maybe.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.