Well, that's the opinion of the French federation, and I am happy to support
that view.
As of the present moment, the UCI is absolutely, factually, without any
effect on the world of cycling (unless it were to attempt to influence the
IOC, and that would be nasty for the track and BMX racers).
Just think of it positively - there is no reason at all to respect actions
or decisions of the UCI. Paris-Nice finished quite well, thanks.
What remains to negotiate - ideally where riders are much more vocal - is
the regulation framework for the use and prohibition of certain substances
and procedures that produce unfair effects AND which are simultaneously
harmful to the health of racers. Vampires ought not be allowed to intrude
on the lives of racers beyond what is a normal business day. No 03H00 tests
; no graveside tests ; no tests where test results are not unequivocally
interpreted.
There needs to be a parallel prohibition on promoters, who with their PR
machines in full gear, try to demonstrate their self-righteousness to be
superior to that of all others. They should NOT have the right to deny to a
legal competitor his right to earn a living in the profession he is
qualified and licenced to exercise. No team bans based on the inscription
of a _former_ violator, already having purged his offence. No individual
bans on that basis either.
Where are the brains these riders supposedly have? Certainly not focused on
the prime factor - without the best riders in the world competing in the
best races of the world, there is no professional bicycle racing.
Just say NO to the UCI. Tell it to your federation - mine is already there.
--
Sandy
--
Mobilité et stabilité ne sont pas antinomiques :
un cycliste n'est stable sur sa bicyclette
qu'en avançant.
- Chirac, J