Ranee Mueller said:In article <[email hidden]>,
Peter Aitken said:In theory the lower costs realized by installing u-scans will be reflected
in overall lower prices.
In theory. In practice the prices do not change one whit. They get
savings from not having to have as many people working, and they keep
the difference. Again, I will not use them, I've used one once, and
have the hassle, the messed up machines, and not receive a discount.
Quoted message said:I do not consider using them a chore that I should
be reimbursed for but rather a convenience that saves me time and hassles. I
am not sure I understand your last sentence but if you are thinking that
groceries make 5% profit on gross sales you are way off base. It's much
lower than that.
Then how do they make money? Are you telling me that if zucchini
costs $0.99 a pound here, it costs them $0.97 a pound? Or are you
saying that after they have paid their employees and their bills it's
closer to that? If it is the second, my point still stands. With fewer
employees, and specifically at a no employee point, I should get a
discount for doing their work.
You do receive a discount, a sizable discount if you shop intelligently
by purchasing as many of the myriad sale items as possible.
Stupidmarkets discount by *what* one buys, not by how many dollars one
spends... what makes you think you deserve a discount by dollar amount
spent... not for your $200 worth of beer and chips. And I'm not being
cute, my example is perfect... stupidmarket's inventory is so varied
that they can't justify discounting by how many dollars spent. And no
one is forcing anyone to shop at any store, not happy with a store's
discount policy, or anything, shop elsewhere.
Competition is mostly what holds prices down. U-scanits are not
necessarily to keep costs down... decent checkout employees have become
exceedingly more difficult to locate. The machines may even cost more
dollars than check-out employees but the machines are there everyday
and they don't [censored] and moan.
Get used to it, won't be long U-Checkits will be as ubiquitous as
ATMs... soon the check-out clerk will not exist at all
I'm an ATM virgin, I've yet to use one. And I truly enjoy the few
minutes I spend chit-chatting with the check-out clerk, but what am I
to do if the clerks and cash become obsolete... I'll have to adapt to
the times... hey, I can still remember like it was yesterday when first
class mail needed a 3¢ stamp and all banks had passbook savings
accounts. The local small town bank I now use still offers passbook
savings so that's what I chose... I kinda like how it's very private,
never shows up on my monthly statement along with checking and money
market, if I need to know my balance I just open my little bank book.
Sheldon