Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

U-lock info

Started by Steve Sharman · · Last activity · 14 posts · 1,053 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 April 2004
Last activity
14 April 2004
Original author
Steve Sharman
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,053
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?

    ty

    Steveo

  2. There's a lock test in the latest Cycling Plus...

    "Steve Sharman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?

  3. On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 04:36:06 GMT, Steve Sharman

    may have said:

    Hi,

    Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?

    Solely my opinion, based on apparent resistance to methods commonly
    applied to defeat it: the Kryptonite New York 3000, or the similar
    models that are sold in Europe.

    http://www.kryptonitelock.com/inetisscripts/abtinetis.exe/PublicArticleDetails@public?artid=3035&atf=products_item&pgrp=20

    or

    http://tinyurl.com/st3h

    Cost will vary according to where you buy it.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:28:47 GMT, robrac <[email hidden]>

    may have said:

    I always figure that if one product is clearly superior to all others,
    then everyone will buy the superior one, and the others will cease to
    be in business.

    Then again, your milage may vary.

    If you have a $50 bike, it probably seems ludicrous to spend $75 on a
    lock...but even a $50 bike needs a lock in most places.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  5. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If you have a $50 bike, it probably seems ludicrous to spend $75 on a
    lock...but even a $50 bike needs a lock in most places.

    Not to me ... I'm paying so I don't have to walk home (c:

    C.Q.C.

  6. Werehatrack said:

    On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:28:47 GMT, robrac <[email hidden]>

    may have said:

    I always figure that if one product is clearly superior to all others,
    then everyone will buy the superior one, and the others will cease to
    be in business.

    Then again, your milage may vary.

    If you have a $50 bike, it probably seems ludicrous to spend $75 on a
    lock...but even a $50 bike needs a lock in most places.

    In which case, the $75 lock is not clearly superior for the
    conditions. If lock price to bike price ratio is the issue, then the
    quality of the lock becomes immaterial.

  7. skuke said:
    robrac said:

    I always figure that if one product is clearly superior to all others,
    then everyone will buy the superior one, and the others will cease to
    be in business.

    Then again, your milage may vary.

    Rob

    What if the clearly superior lock is 5x more expensive than any other and
    all you're doing is locking up a relatively inexpensive commuter bike?
    ...that's why the "others" would stay in business.

    <SNIP>

    Because there is no one lock which is clearly superior for all
    conditions, and it is an incredibly personal decision of how much
    money to spend for how much protection, and not a question of what is
    the "best" lock to purchase, but what is the best lock to purchase
    taking into consideration how much the lock cost, how much the bike
    cost, how much the lock weighs, how convienent is it to carry the
    lock, is it easy enough to use in the middle of a rain storm, and so
    many other variables that my mind is glazing over.

    As my daughter likes to say, everyone has a solution to the problem,
    but nobody has a solution that works for everyone.

    So, my next suggestion is to find someone using a lock that you think
    will do whatever it is that you want, look at it, do not steal it, go
    to the lbs and purchase a similar lock.

    Rob

  8. On 07 Apr 2004 18:47:23 +0100 (BST), David Damerell

    may have said:
    robrac said:

    I always figure that if one product is clearly superior to all others,
    then everyone will buy the superior one, and the others will cease to
    be in business.

    Never mind that this is manifest nonsense even where one product is
    clearly superior (I know it's also an article of faith amongst economists,
    but that doesn't make it true); it makes even less sense here where
    different people have different desires. Not everyone will regard the
    toughest lock as superior irrespective of cost and weight.

    Very true. The old saying that "one man's treasure is another's
    trash" readily applies. If the same item was the best for all
    applications, then there would be little need for choices...but the
    world is full of choices because one size almost never fits all.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  9. Rob may have said:
    Werehatrack said:

    If you have a $50 bike, it probably seems ludicrous to spend $75 on a
    lock...but even a $50 bike needs a lock in most places.

    In which case, the $75 lock is not clearly superior for the
    conditions. If lock price to bike price ratio is the issue, then the
    quality of the lock becomes immaterial.

    Well, not commetely immaterial, but the price/benefit ratio may rule
    out the more expensive units. Of course, there can be instances in
    which it makes sense to have a $100 lock for a $50 bike. If the bike
    is in use by a NYC messenger as his backup, for instance, then the
    price of the bike is less relevant than the reasonable certainty that
    it will still be present when the rider returns for it. I'm told that
    they favor massive chains and WMD-resistant padlocks over U-locks,
    though.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  10. Steve Sharman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?

    ty

    Steveo

    see no 3 of FAQ:
    <http://www.nybma.com/>

  11. [email hidden] (B.C. Cletta) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Steve Sharman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?

    ty

    Steveo

    see no 3 of FAQ:
    <http://www.nybma.com/>

    I have to say that I totally agree with the thoughts on a quad chain,
    seeing as I live in Chicago. The thing that I have been curious about
    with my quad chain is this, with the weight of this thing will it
    eventually lead my wheelset gettting out of true? I mean every time I
    slip that thing through my rear wheel I think about that. These things
    are heavy!

    I have seen enough bike carcasses to know that I want my rear wheel!
    Front wheels are much cheaper to replace🙂

    And they are right about that mini U-lock that comes on it. toss it! I
    stopped using mine once I could feel the key was starting to come
    apart, but darn that thing lost a lot of weight with that bit gone!

  12. David Damerell <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    robrac said:
    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> may have said:
    >Whats the best U-Lock on the market and whats the cost of it?
    Solely my opinion, based on apparent resistance to methods commonly
    applied to defeat it: the Kryptonite New York 3000, or the similar
    models that are sold in Europe.


    I always figure that if one product is clearly superior to all others,
    then everyone will buy the superior one, and the others will cease to
    be in business.


    one principle that works against this assertion is:
    the point of diminishing returns.

    consider a case where the "best" was objectively only 1% better
    than the "next best" - but it cost 2% more.

    would you still buy the "best"?

    probably.

    what if the cost were 20% more?

    maybe.

    200%?

    the point [of diminishing returns] is where it;s not worth it to you.

    and it;s different for everyone.

    this is why the "best" doesn;t just beat everything else out.

    sometimes it doesn;t even survive.

    and of course in most examples, the criteria are subjective so you
    really can;t even say what is "best".

    or maybe one thing can be measured objectively [weight] but
    others can;t be ["this one feels better", "the color is prettier",
    "you can;t see the combination numbers in the dark"]

    or one person;s feature is another person;s nightmare.
    ["power windows - cool!" vs "i hate power windows because they
    are unreliable"]

    etc etc etc

    wle.

  13. wle said:

    David Damerell <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...


    [no text quoted from me]

    Watch that - don't include attribution lines that don't have corresponding
    text.
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> Distortion Field!

  14. David Damerell said:
    wle said:

    David Damerell <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>... [no text quoted from
    me]

    Watch that - don't include attribution lines that don't have
    corresponding text.

    TRY TELLING THAT TO BILL ZAUMEN*!!!

    Bill "over it, really" S.

    * rec.misc thing

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.