UK and Europe · Public discussion

Tyres!

Started by Moo · · Last activity · 28 posts · 355 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
18 June 2007
Last activity
20 June 2007
Original author
Moo
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
355
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Simon Brooke wrote on 19/06/2007 21:23 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    I used Velociraptors for years. Not fast, not light, noisy on tarmac, but
    good secure grip on anything but wet roots. They feel very safe to ride
    on. Unfortunately they seem to be discontinued, although you can still get
    them in the shops.

    There are tradeoffs in these things. Softer rubber is grippier, but wears
    faster. Bigger knobs grip better in mud and clay (and, to an extent, sand
    and gravel) but roll slower. Light tires puncture easily. Pay your money
    and take your choice.

    Having said all that, it seems to me sensible that a front tyre should be
    optimised for steering and the rear tyre for traction, so the concept of
    the Velociraptor (and the old Smoke/Dart combination that the Velociraptor
    copied) seems to me a sensible one.

    Dammit Simon, you're agreeing with me again ;-)

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  2. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven

    (') said:

    Moo wrote on 19/06/2007 19:59 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    Further to the above, I've checked some reviews, very mixed opinions,
    some say they are great tyres, others say there is a huge amount of drag
    making uphills much more difficult... They are pretty chunky!


    To be honest, although they are an old design (and therefore available
    cheap) its hard to beat a pair of WTB Velociraptors as all round tyres.
    I have tried other tyres but keep 'raptors on most of my off-road
    bikes.

    I used Velociraptors for years. Not fast, not light, noisy on tarmac, but
    good secure grip on anything but wet roots. They feel very safe to ride
    on. Unfortunately they seem to be discontinued, although you can still get
    them in the shops.

    There are tradeoffs in these things. Softer rubber is grippier, but wears
    faster. Bigger knobs grip better in mud and clay (and, to an extent, sand
    and gravel) but roll slower. Light tires puncture easily. Pay your money
    and take your choice.

    Having said all that, it seems to me sensible that a front tyre should be
    optimised for steering and the rear tyre for traction, so the concept of
    the Velociraptor (and the old Smoke/Dart combination that the Velociraptor
    copied) seems to me a sensible one.

    What are you using now?

  3. Quoted message said:

    I get the impression neither are good on road (even for short
    distances) but the panaracer is better.

    Heh, you're talking to a roadie here, so I think ALL tyres are [censored] on the
    roads unless they're slicks 😉

    My take on the mtb tyre issue is to go with tyres that are good for the
    off-road stuff and sod the road performance. I'd gladly trade rolling
    resistance on the tarmac for better grip on the slippy stuff. Get slicks
    to slap on if you're ever doing all-tarmac stuff.

    As to cheap or expensive, go with whatever is best for the job (which might
    be the cheapest). Tyres are a contact point, so it's not worth saving a
    few quid on - they're something where you'll really notice the difference.
    Same goes with saddles, handlebars, grips/bartape, pedals+shoes, clothing.

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, Simon
    Brooke
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    You only get snake-bites if your tyres aren't hard enough, so that's a
    quick one to solve.


    How about if they're just the right pressure for optimum grip, but a bit
    too soft for that big hard lump you didn't see?

  5. Mark
    <pleasegivegenerously@warmail*turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com.invalid>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I get the impression neither are good on road (even for short
    distances) but the panaracer is better.

    Heh, you're talking to a roadie here, so I think ALL tyres are [censored] on the
    roads unless they're slicks 😉

    My take on the mtb tyre issue is to go with tyres that are good for the
    off-road stuff and sod the road performance. I'd gladly trade rolling
    resistance on the tarmac for better grip on the slippy stuff. Get slicks
    to slap on if you're ever doing all-tarmac stuff.


    yes thats what i do, i have irc mud mad which do what they suggest which
    is to bite into wet stuff, but are not great on road. but thats fine.

    Quoted message said:

    As to cheap or expensive, go with whatever is best for the job (which might
    be the cheapest). Tyres are a contact point, so it's not worth saving a
    few quid on - they're something where you'll really notice the difference.
    Same goes with saddles, handlebars, grips/bartape, pedals+shoes, clothing.

    roger

  6. Moo said the following on 19/06/2007 22:09:

    Quoted message said:

    I get the impression neither are good on road (even for short distances)
    but the panaracer is better.

    Just to throw another spanner into the works, you might want to look at
    Schwalbe Smart Sams. These are a good compromise tyre that tends to
    stay on my MTB most because I often do more road miles to get to the
    off-road areas than I do off-road! They are fine for typical bridleway
    or singletrack or even mildly rocky bits, although I wouldn't use them
    if there are wet roots around. They also come out good in reviews, even
    with the mtbr.com crowd :-)

    Just a thought!

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  7. Moo said the following on 19/06/2007 17:56:

    Quoted message said:

    Not heard the term snake bite before, is it like a pinch flat?

    It's just another name for a pinch flat. The reason it's called a
    snakebite should be obvious :-)

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  8. in message <[email hidden]>, Moo

    (') said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven

    (') said:

    Moo wrote on 19/06/2007 19:59 +0100:
    > Further to the above, I've checked some reviews, very mixed opinions,
    > some say they are great tyres, others say there is a huge amount of
    > drag
    > making uphills much more difficult... They are pretty chunky!
    To be honest, although they are an old design (and therefore available
    cheap) its hard to beat a pair of WTB Velociraptors as all round tyres.
    I have tried other tyres but keep 'raptors on most of my off-road
    bikes.

    I used Velociraptors for years. Not fast, not light, noisy on tarmac,
    but good secure grip on anything but wet roots. They feel very safe to
    ride on. Unfortunately they seem to be discontinued, although you can
    still get them in the shops.

    What are you using now?

    I'm experimenting. I haven't got a new favourite yet, but I'm trying to
    find a lighter tyre with good general grip and reasonable puncture
    resistance.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If God does not write LISP, God writes some code so similar to
    ;; LISP as to make no difference.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.