UK and Europe · Public discussion

Tyres

Started by Stratton · · Last activity · 8 posts · 805 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
25 June 2003
Last activity
26 June 2003
Original author
Stratton
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
805
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi

    Just patching up my sons bike after he trashed it again, fitted a spare tyre to replace the bald
    front. The rear tyre is a 2.00 and the front is now 2.1. this I don't suppose will cause any
    problems but it did set me thinking, what would be the effect of putting say a 1.5 on the front and
    a 1.75/1.9 on the rear? Would the bike handle the same but be slightly more comfortable? My bike is
    a rigid and I am at the age where comfort is a serious consideration.

    Your comments appreciated.

    stratton

  2. stratton said:

    Just patching up my sons bike after he trashed it again, fitted a spare tyre to replace the bald
    front. The rear tyre is a 2.00 and the front is now 2.1. this I don't suppose will cause any
    problems but it did set me thinking, what would be the effect of putting say a 1.5 on the front
    and a 1.75/1.9 on the rear? Would the bike handle the same but be slightly more comfortable? My
    bike is a rigid and I am at the age where comfort is a serious consideration.

    There's no reason why front and rear tyres have to be matched as general handling is not affected
    by different widths* - each tyre doesn't "know" what the other one is. But tyres should be
    appropriate for the rims. Most modern MTB rims can take quite a wide range, so at least 1.5 to 2.1
    will probably fit ok.

    The wider the tyre, generally, the more comfort you'll get. Narrower versions of the same tyres will
    be be less, not more, comfortable! A wider front tyre will absorb buzz and shock better. However, a
    slick "road" 1.5 tyre may provide more comfort on the road than a knobbly off-road 2.1.

    * Except a narrower front tyre may provide a slightly better steering "feel" (less squidging and
    steering may feel more precise). Traction will be reduced, though.

    ~PB

  3. Pete Biggs said:

    There's no reason why front and rear tyres have to be matched as general handling is not affected
    by different widths* - each tyre doesn't "know" what the other one is. But tyres should be
    appropriate for the rims. Most modern MTB rims can take quite a wide range, so at least 1.5 to 2.1
    will probably fit ok.

    The wider the tyre, generally, the more comfort you'll get. Narrower versions of the same tyres
    will be be less, not more, comfortable! A wider front tyre will absorb buzz and shock better.
    However, a slick "road" 1.5 tyre may provide more comfort on the road than a knobbly off-road 2.1.

    * Except a narrower front tyre may provide a slightly better steering "feel" (less squidging and
    steering may feel more precise). Traction will be reduced, though.

    ~PB

    As much as I thought, currently running 1.5 slicks, the front feels ok but as I am larger than
    average the back feels 'flat' compared to the 1.9 knobbly. Perhaps when these need replacing I will
    try the odd combination.

    Thanks for the reply

    stratton

  4. There was an article in one of the magazines to do with a new pair of tryes from Vittoria (I think)
    where the rear is fatter than the front, better for cornering at speed apparently. They talked a
    little about performance motor bikes where the rear is far fatter than the front. So I guess your
    situation will not be a problem.

    "stratton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi

    Just patching up my sons bike after he trashed it again, fitted a spare


    tyre

    Quoted message said:

    to replace the bald front. The rear tyre is a 2.00 and the front is now


    2.1.

    Quoted message said:

    this I don't suppose will cause any problems but it did set me thinking, what would be the effect
    of putting say a 1.5 on the front and a 1.75/1.9


    on

    Quoted message said:

    the rear? Would the bike handle the same but be slightly more comfortable? My bike is a rigid and
    I am at the age where comfort is a serious consideration.

    Your comments appreciated.

    stratton

  5. "M Series" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    There was an article in one of the magazines to do with a new pair of tryes from Vittoria (I
    think) where the rear is fatter than the front, better for cornering at speed apparently. They
    talked a little about performance motor bikes where the rear is far fatter than the front. So I
    guess your situation will not be a problem.

    Vittoria may well do something along these lines, though the version I'm aware of is from
    Continental in the shape of the Attack (front-specific)/Force (rear-specific) pairing.

    David E. Belcher

    Dept. of Chemistry, University of York

  6. M Series said:

    There was an article in one of the magazines to do with a new pair of tryes from Vittoria (I
    think) where the rear is fatter than the front, better for cornering at speed apparently.

    Schwalbe have recently introduced a tyre combo along these lines - the Stelvio Evolution Pack. Same
    width front and rear but different tread compounds. Only available in 23-622, chiz, me want a
    406/559 version...

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  7. You are correct it was Conti that I was thinking of

    "David E. Belcher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "M Series" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    There was an article in one of the magazines to do with a new pair of


    tryes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    from Vittoria (I think) where the rear is fatter than the front, better


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    cornering at speed apparently. They talked a little about performance


    motor

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bikes where the rear is far fatter than the front. So I guess your


    situation

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    will not be a problem.

    Vittoria may well do something along these lines, though the version I'm aware of is from
    Continental in the shape of the Attack (front-specific)/Force (rear-specific) pairing.

    David E. Belcher

    Dept. of Chemistry, University of York

  8. Dave Larrington said:
    M Series said:

    There was an article in one of the magazines to do with a new pair of tryes from Vittoria (I
    think) where the rear is fatter than the front, better for cornering at speed apparently.

    Schwalbe have recently introduced a tyre combo along these lines - the Stelvio Evolution Pack.
    Same width front and rear but different tread compounds. Only available in 23-622, chiz, me want a
    406/559 version...

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

    Thanks for that, I will check these suggestions out prior to making the purchaseing decision.

    Best regards

    stratton

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.