Yuri Budilov said:"Bleve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:>
Bontrager race-x-lite - these were great, I chewed the rear out to the
canvas in 3,300km, the front has done 6000 and is still ok - *no*
punctures with these at all (until the rear wore through .. but that's
a given!)
I also have Trek Mad-One and B/R Race-x-lite tyres 700*23C, completely
slick. I found them very scary in the wet.
Yeah? I raced on them in the wet and thought they were fine.
Remember, slick tyres are not a weakness in the wet on a bicycle. Road
bike tyres do not need tread, in fact, tread is a grip *reducer* on
bicycle tyres. It's the compound and flex of the tyre that determines
its grip. Tread is designed to sell tyres to riders who don't
understand how tyre shape works. Like those soft, thickly padded
seats. They sell well, but are bad!
Quoted message said:I have only done about 2200km on
a set and I think they are 60%-70% worn out now. No punctures yet but they
cut very easy, very soft. I admit that I pick all the [censored] out of my tyres
after every ride (I ride on Sat and on Sun only) with extra-fine-point
screwdriver so I pick the splinters out of them before they drill in and
burst the tube. This was my LBS advice and so far it has proven to be a good
one. And I run 100psi/7bar on them front and rear, no pinch flats, not even
on 90psi, but I am not a heavy rider.
I never bother with that. I also don't do the "wipe hand over tyre
when riding" thing either. It's supersition, IMO. I get no more or
less punctures than anyone else I ride with, and they're usually caused
by wearing the tyre out and the casing being thin enough that a bit of
glass can get through it (which is the basis for my "2 punctures &
you're out" rule).
Quoted message said:I only ride in fitness-training mode, no racing, so I was going to buy
Michelin Carbon next and them I saw your comment about them in the wet! Not
happy.
How long ago did you buy those Michelin Carbons? 2003? 2004? 2005?
'03 I think.
Quoted message said:I read they have been "improved" in their latest 2005+ incarnation. They
used to be called Axial Carbon last year or year before last. Then Axial
name got dropped and I recall the tyres got "updated" too.
Improved usually means new graphics and a new box. But sometimes
there's a real difference. In this case, I have NFI 🙂
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Michelin Carbon - they wear ok, but I found them distressingly slippery
in the wet. Ok in the dry though. Not on my bike again, ever.
Quoted message said:
Vittoria Rubino Pro - I have one on my wet weather (trek 1400) bike on
the front, it's done ~8,000km, no puntures, grippy and fast rolling. I
like these tyres a lot. I used them for the Warny in 2004. Lovely
tyres. These rock.
So for fitness/training on a dry road do you think Rubino Pro still would be
better bet that Michelin Carbon? How much longer will M/Carbon last compared
to V/Rubino Pro?
I don't know, all I did was relate my experience. Carbon's were ok in
the dry when I used them a few years back, but I ride all weather (even
snow! see this :
http://www.aboc.com.au/images/galleries/20041113_climbing_camp/DSCF1352.html
) and a tyre that's [censored] when wet, I won't use. Will it always be dry?
Carbon bikes don't mind getting wet 🙂