3_days said:JT -
Boy am I glad you posted - I was looking at the Kestrels - (assuming I don't win Cervelo's sweepstakes for the new Soloist carbon - [yeah, right]) - Anyway, tell me whatever about how your Kestrel rides compared to your Soloist ...
If you can understand my babble, here are two things I love about my Soloist (2004 - Team) - and here's basically what I'm looking for in another bike (preferably, carbon) -
Aerodynamics - call me crazy, but I feel there's no doubt the Soloist is fast -
Tri-bike (sort of) set-up - notice how the chain stay length is a little shorter on the Soloist - with the seat tube angle, it kinda puts you "in the back seat" - I love that! It was the first true difference I noticed - it gives me a lot of variety in the seat position relative to the BB.
Anyway, let me know what you think - the closest Kestrel dealer is about an hour away from me ... are there any other bike manufacturers that have similar aero-ish frame shapes?
Yeah, I can only afford the carbon Soloist if I won the sweepstakes. But surprisingly my aluminum Soloist feels similar in ride to my Kestrel - kinda smooth. But for me, my Kestrel has a better ride geometry and fit than my Cervelo. I have a 51 cm Soloist and a 52 cm Kestrel Talon.
As for the ride, I guess the Kestrel feels smoother because it's carbon, but I know my Soloist is faster only because I have low friction hubs on my Ksyrium SLs vs. the high friction hub Campy Eurus wheels on my Kestrel. I too wanted a carbon fiber bike (because of the carbon fiber hype) and the Kestrel Talon was my only choice. But my bike built up in the pic weighed 19.03 lbs - it has a lot of extra stuff like a Polar Power Output kit and a Shimano Flightdeck computer. My Kestrel Talon is now my favorite bike because it's carbon fiber and because it has a Flightdeck computer and a power output kit (I recommend this setup). I've only put 258.6 miles on my Kestrel so far, but the Kestrel feels like a fast bike too. I guess I have to test ride the Kestrel on rough pavement to see how it smooths the ride.
Well, if you're gonna do triathlons the Kestrel Talon, aero seatpost, Kestrel EMS carbon bars (aero bar clippable), and a set of HED 3 wheels will cost less than a carbon Soloist F & F. The Kestrel EMS Pro SL bars aren't aero bar clippable.
I'd say the only way to tell if the Kestrel Talon or the carbon Soloist is faster is to test the frames' aerodynamics in a wind tunnel. And I think these are the only companies that make aero carbon fiber road bikes.
The only thing bad about the Kestrel is that they don't have the true aerodynamic airfoil shapes that the Cervelos have. But at least the Talon has almost aero seatstays. And it's hard to tell which one has the better aero seatube design.