Australia and New Zealand ยท Public discussion

Turnbull takes the train

Started by cfsmtb ยท ยท Last activity ยท 22 posts ยท 1,094 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
18 April 2006
Last activity
18 April 2006
Original author
cfsmtb
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,094
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1โ€“20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Reported in The Shun, maybe he's just a few steps away from a bike as well ... ๐Ÿ™‚ Sheesh, what sort of daily driver + nice commuter gear could Turnbull get for 20K? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    ***********************

    Turnbull gets $20K for transport
    http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,18846933%255E1702,00.html

    FEDERAL Liberal MP Malcolm Turnbull has become so fed up with Sydney's traffic congestion he has ditched his taxpayer-funded car and opted for public transport.

    Mr Turnbull has won the right to forgo his car and will instead receive almost $20,000 a year to use on buses, trains, taxis or ferries for his parliamentary, electoral or official business.

    Mr Turnbull's decision came after the Remuneration Tribunal ruled he could get an extra $19,500 in electoral allowance - the tax equivalent to a car and annual running costs - in return for leaving his car at home.

    "You can't park. That's particularly so in the eastern suburbs. I tend to get public transport or a taxi," he said.

    "I'm very committed to the greater use of public transport because, ultimately, we reduce congestion in the cities if people drive their autos less."

    The tribunal's ruling requires Mr Turnbull to keep receipts or copies of tickets to account for his expenses on public transport.

    Previously, MPs using public transport and taxis for business were unable to claim back the cost.

    Mr Turnbull said taxpayers would not be forking out any more than if he had kept his taxpayer-funded car.

  2. Step in the right direction - well done Mr Turnbull!!!!!

    Now, they just have to make PT, bikes, etc availablte under salary
    sacrifice (and FBT free please!!), and it will be even better!!!!!!!

    Abby (dreaming...)

  3. often wondered why MPs arent forced to use the very public services they tell us are doing a great job.
    PT, Public Hospitals, Public Schools, etc
    might make them see/experience the horror first-hand...

  4. On 2006-04-18, cfsmtb (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:


    Reported in The Shun, maybe he's just a few steps away from a bike as
    well ... ๐Ÿ™‚ Sheesh, what sort of daily driver + nice commuter gear
    could Turnbull get for 20K? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    ***********************

    Turnbull gets $20K for transport
    http://tinyurl.com/sx82s

    FEDERAL Liberal MP Malcolm Turnbull has become so fed up with Sydney's
    traffic congestion he has ditched his taxpayer-funded car and opted for
    public transport.

    Mr Turnbull has won the right to forgo his car and will instead receive

    "won the right to forgo his car"?

    Quoted message said:

    almost $20,000 a year to use on buses, trains, taxis or ferries for his
    parliamentary, electoral or official business.

    Sweeet! I take it he's going to buy a few hundred yearly tickets, and
    distribute them to his enterage?

    Quoted message said:

    Previously, MPs using public transport and taxis for business were
    unable to claim back the cost.

    That was so very bogus. What on Earth led them to have that as a rule
    originally? Thank goodness sanity has prevailed.

    --
    TimC
    Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs. --unknown

  5. cfsmtb said:

    The tribunal's ruling requires Mr Turnbull to keep receipts or copies
    of tickets to account for his expenses on public transport.

    That should make interestng viewing as he tries to retrieve a receipt or
    ticket at the automatic vending machine/turnstyles. I suppose they have
    to set up a special MPs lane at Eastern Suburbs railway stations for
    Malcolm and his mates.

    P

    --
    Peter McCallum
    Mackay Qld AUSTRALIA

  6. Peter McCallum said:

    c
    I suppose they have
    to set up a special MPs lane at Eastern Suburbs railway stations for
    Malcolm and his mates.

    extra wide, you mean?

    re all this tax stuff, another thing that occurred to me (outting BV bias here...) why not make employees of Not-for-Profit organisations that are clearly contributing/working for the community tax free?
    As many of these org's struggle to compete with commercial workplaces for the best talent, it would be easier to attract em if they could compete on the same level of remunierationif not having to pay their staff tax (or at least a lot less!). These people's contributions would far outweigh the tax revenue not paid to MrCostello in the work they do.

    Oh, and make bikes tax free too ๐Ÿ˜„

  7. iaijakarta:

    Quoted message said:

    stupidity

    Please note you are being reported to your employer:

    Please send this form to: Conference Secretary, Traditions
    and Modernity, Department of Architecture, University of
    Tasmania, PO Box 1214, Launceston, Tas. 7250, Australia.

    ****************************************************
    Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia DKI Jakarta
    Sekretariat: Jakarta Design Center Lt. 6
    Jl. Gatot Subroto 53, Slipi, Jakarta 10260
    Telp. 5304711, 5304719 - Fax 5304711
    BBs 5304719,,77,,77 - email : [email hidden]

  8. flyingdutch said:

    re all this tax stuff, another thing that occurred to me (outting BV bias here...) why not make employees of Not-for-Profit organisations that are clearly contributing/working for the community tax free?

    ๐Ÿ˜„


    'cause every 'businessman' who currently minimises his tax by using complexes of trusts and companies would cease to pay any tax at all by using not-for-profits*.

    Steve(*grumpy because I have sore foot and cannot ride at the moment)A

  9. SteveA said:

    'cause every 'businessman' who currently minimises his tax by using complexes of trusts and companies would cease to pay any tax at all by using not-for-profits*.

    Steve(*grumpy because I have sore foot and cannot ride at the moment)A

    yers, well of course the boundaries of what is a 'NFP' would be tightened accordingly...

    "Behind every rich man is a fat, nerdy, little accountant who measures everything with numbers. Values will only be attributed thus, hence if you cant label it, you shall not value it"

  10. On 2006-04-18, Donga (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    iaijakarta:

    Quoted message said:

    stupidity

    Please note you are being reported to your employer:

    Please send this form to: Conference Secretary, Traditions
    and Modernity, Department of Architecture, University of
    Tasmania, PO Box 1214, Launceston, Tas. 7250, Australia.

    Except that it's Rogger Bratton using a forged email address.

    --
    TimC
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    Version: 3.12
    GS d- s:- a-- C+++(++++) UL(SOBI)+++(++++) P+++ L+++ E++(----)
    W++(--) N+++ o K+++ w---(++) O- M--(+) V PS++ PE-(--) Y PGP t->+
    !5 X R? tv- b- DI+ D--- G e++>++++ h* r(--) y?
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

  11. iaijakarta:

    Quoted message said:

    stupidity

    Please note you are being reported to your employer:

    Please send this form to: Conference Secretary, Traditions
    and Modernity, Department of Architecture, University of
    Tasmania, PO Box 1214, Launceston, Tas. 7250, Australia.

    ****************************************************
    Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia DKI Jakarta
    Sekretariat: Jakarta Design Center Lt. 6
    Jl. Gatot Subroto 53, Slipi, Jakarta 10260
    Telp. 5304711, 5304719 - Fax 5304711
    BBs 5304719,,77,,77 - email : [email hidden]

  12. TimC:

    Quoted message said:

    Except that it's Rogger Bratton using a forged email address.

    Have you worked out where he lives?

  13. Donga said:

    TimC:

    Quoted message said:

    Except that it's Rogger Bratton using a forged email address.

    Have you worked out where he lives?

    Just ignore the twit.

  14. Donga said:

    TimC:

    Quoted message said:

    Except that it's Rogger Bratton using a forged email address.

    Have you worked out where he lives?

    google it. he even gets a map!

  15. flyingdutch said:
    Peter McCallum said:

    c
    I suppose they have
    to set up a special MPs lane at Eastern Suburbs railway stations for
    Malcolm and his mates.

    extra wide, you mean?

    Of course, with appropriately coloured leather trim.

    Quoted message said:


    re all this tax stuff, another thing that occurred to me (outting BV
    bias here...) why not make employees of Not-for-Profit organisations
    that are clearly contributing/working for the community tax free?
    As many of these org's struggle to compete with commercial workplaces
    for the best talent, it would be easier to attract em if they could
    compete on the same level of remunierationif not having to pay their
    staff tax (or at least a lot less!). These people's contributions would
    far outweigh the tax revenue not paid to MrCostello in the work they
    do.

    Oh, and make bikes tax free too ๐Ÿ˜„

    I can see what you mean but I reckon it's mainly the careerists in
    community organisations who demand remuneration that is comparable with
    private companies (or even government). One of the beauties of the
    community sector is that it is democratic and not dominated by
    "professionals".

    Then again there are people working just about full time for community
    organisations for next to nothing because they believe in the cause. If
    the organisations had a bit more money they could probably pay a bit
    more. Some extra grant money could always go a long way.

    It was interesting to see how much the Federal Government "rationalised"
    the Grants to Voluntary Conservation & Heritage Organisations program
    last year. What was a tiny grants program, by federal govt standards,
    became even smaller. It seemed to target the groups that were most vocal
    for the biggest cuts.

    P

    --
    Peter McCallum
    Mackay Qld AUSTRALIA

  16. flyingdutch said:

    yers, well of course the boundaries of what is a 'NFP' would be tightened accordingly...

    "Behind every rich man is a fat, nerdy, little accountant who measures everything with numbers. Values will only be attributed thus, hence if you cant label it, you shall not value it"

    change in legislation = more income for lawyers and accountants + more opportunities for new ways to circumvent the rules

    The current superannuation regulatory legislation is called the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act. It is referred to as the 'SIS Act' for short. When it was introduced, it was also known as the 'Solicitors' Income Supplementation Act'!!

    Steve(cynical accountant/lawyer/ex-financial regulator)A

  17. flyingdutch said:
    Peter McCallum said:

    c
    I suppose they have
    to set up a special MPs lane at Eastern Suburbs railway stations for
    Malcolm and his mates.

    extra wide, you mean?

    re all this tax stuff, another thing that occurred to me (outting BV
    bias here...) why not make employees of Not-for-Profit organisations
    that are clearly contributing/working for the community tax free?
    As many of these org's struggle to compete with commercial workplaces
    for the best talent, it would be easier to attract em if they could
    compete on the same level of remunierationif not having to pay their
    staff tax (or at least a lot less!). These people's contributions would
    far outweigh the tax revenue not paid to MrCostello in the work they
    do.

    Employees of "public benevolent institutions" already get concessional
    tax treatment, in the form of an exemption on fringe benefits tax up to
    a certain annual limit. Because there is no FBT, anything can be
    salary packaged (tax free), including for example mortgage payments and
    credit card bills.

    Not all N-f-P organisations are treated as full PBIs and there are
    various levels of PBI with different FBT exemption thresholds, but the
    scheme you describe already exists.

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, and make bikes tax free too ๐Ÿ˜„

    If you're an employee of a PBI, you could package a bike within the
    limit.

    What you probably mean is make them tax free for EVERYONE. I agree
    with that one. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Travis

  18. TimC said:

    That was so very bogus. What on Earth led them to have that as a rule
    originally? Thank goodness sanity has prevailed.

    Because MPs got a car as perk and that was that.

    Why have an FBT system with discounts for cars that increase the more you
    use it yet fully taxes train and bus tickets given to employees?

    Why have a tarif discount on 4WD registered in urban areas?

    There are lots of stupid subsidies around.

    dewatf.

  19. Absent Husband said:

    Step in the right direction - well done Mr Turnbull!!!!!

    Now, they just have to make PT, bikes, etc availablte under salary
    sacrifice (and FBT free please!!), and it will be even better!!!!!!!

    Abby (dreaming...)


    Are you sure bikes are subject to FBT. I was told motorbikes weren't by
    someone who should know

    --
    Remove norubbish to reply

  20. Travis said:
    flyingdutch said:
    Peter McCallum said:

    c
    I suppose they have
    to set up a special MPs lane at Eastern Suburbs railway stations for
    Malcolm and his mates.

    extra wide, you mean?

    re all this tax stuff, another thing that occurred to me (outting BV
    bias here...) why not make employees of Not-for-Profit organisations
    that are clearly contributing/working for the community tax free?
    As many of these org's struggle to compete with commercial workplaces
    for the best talent, it would be easier to attract em if they could
    compete on the same level of remunierationif not having to pay their
    staff tax (or at least a lot less!). These people's contributions would
    far outweigh the tax revenue not paid to MrCostello in the work they
    do.

    Employees of "public benevolent institutions" already get concessional
    tax treatment, in the form of an exemption on fringe benefits tax up to
    a certain annual limit. Because there is no FBT, anything can be
    salary packaged (tax free), including for example mortgage payments and
    credit card bills.

    Not all N-f-P organisations are treated as full PBIs and there are
    various levels of PBI with different FBT exemption thresholds, but the
    scheme you describe already exists.

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, and make bikes tax free too ๐Ÿ˜„

    If you're an employee of a PBI, you could package a bike within the
    limit.

    What you probably mean is make them tax free for EVERYONE. I agree
    with that one. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Travis

    I don't think that BV or any bicycle advocacy group would fit the
    definition of a Public Benevolent Institution (unless it was in the
    business of giving free bicycles to poor people for instance, or
    teaching disabled people to ride).

    P

    --
    Peter McCallum
    Mackay Qld AUSTRALIA

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.