Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Tubeless Tires

Started by S. Anderson · · Last activity · 11 posts · 757 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
S. Anderson
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
757
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day
    above 15C this year. I was checking out the Michelin
    tires and was quite shocked to see the pricing. The Comp
    S tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to anyone?
    The Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to
    anyone?? Not sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but
    you pay $20 extra not including different rims. And to
    me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My last
    motorcycle front was $124.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

    --
    Scott Anderson

    ICBM: 43.41 N 79.38 W

  2. Scott Anderson said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day
    above 15C this year. I was checking out the Michelin tires
    and was quite shocked to see the pricing. The Comp S
    tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to anyone? The
    Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone??
    Not sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay
    $20 extra not including different rims. And to me, $94 for
    a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My last motorcycle front
    was $124.

    If you take your bicycling seriously, cost is not an
    issue,... at least not one the modern bicyclist mentions.
    It's like the owner of a huge SUV complaining about the
    price of gasoline.

    Don't buy that stuff. Admit it, the stuff is way out of line
    in price and utility. When are we going to see the demise of
    all this extravagance? By the way, my truck is bigger than
    yours, has more expensive and larger wheels and has eight
    exhaust pipes. I can afford it, but maybe you can't. Ho Ho.

    Get tubeless tire$ now!

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden]

  3. "S. Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day
    above 15C this year. I was checking out the Michelin tires
    and was quite shocked to see the pricing. The Comp S
    tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to anyone? The
    Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone??


    Not

    Quoted message said:

    sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay $20
    extra not


    including

    Quoted message said:

    different rims. And to me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a
    bit much. My last motorcycle front was $124.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

    --
    Scott Anderson

    ICBM: 43.41 N 79.38 W

    I see you've already heard from Jobst. On his recco a few
    years back I started riding Avocet Fasgrip TT 30 tires.
    They were awesome. Had to have my LBS special order them,
    but it was worth it since they cost at least $15 less than
    what other tires were going for at the time. But alas ...
    Avocet got on the marketing glitz bandwagon and now all
    their stuff is sky high. I can't get the Fasgrip TT 30s
    here in rural SC anymore.

    So I buy up closeouts from the catalogs. My recent favorites
    have been Paribas ... made by Vredestein. Nashbar has them
    in their catalog for $25 but they're only $15 on the
    website. They're awesome little tires. Oh ... you've gotta
    be willing to live with yellow. Still, nice tires --
    especially for the price.

    I'm a high mileage rider and I'm into having good equipment
    and all. I'm not a retro grouch or anything. But paying $50
    for a tire, IMHO, is just stupid.

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that
    cost $189 ... forget it ... you've apparently already fallen
    on your head and it's too late for you.

    Bob C.

  4. On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:08:38 GMT, [email hidden], in

    a rare moment of humorous intent said:

    Don't buy that stuff. Admit it, the stuff is way out of
    line in price and utility. When are we going to see the
    demise of all this extravagance? By the way, my truck is
    bigger than yours, has more expensive and larger wheels and
    has eight exhaust pipes. I can afford it, but maybe you
    can't. Ho Ho.

    Get tubeless tire$ now!

    At least no one has yet marketed a bike wheel with a free-
    spinning decorative disc between the spoke rows.

    Of course, having mentioned the concept, I'm sure some style-
    driven marketing fool will be on the phone to a manufacturer
    in China to get the process rolling before Monday...if it
    hasn't already begun.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  5. On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:44:40 -0400, "psycholist"

    may have said:

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that
    cost $189 ... forget it ... you've apparently already
    fallen on your head and it's too late for you.

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's
    an even pricier one now.

    nashbar.comresults.cfm
    1045&storetype=&estoreid=&init=y&pagename=

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225!

    Doesn't that just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As
    for the question of "one what?", we'll leave that to
    individual choice.)

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  6. On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:44:40 -0400, "psycholist"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that
    cost $189 ... forget it ... you've apparently already
    fallen on your head and it's too late for you.

    Amusing to see how the rhetoric has changed over time.

  7. Miscatonic said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that
    cost $189... forget it... you've apparently already
    fallen on your head and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week",
    there's an even pricier one now.

    tinyurl.com25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't that
    just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the
    question of "one what?", we'll leave that to individual
    choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on the
    | lightest thing to come out of the wizard works of Giro
    | Helmets, yet. A huge lone star adorns this bright red,
    | white and blue brain cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel vents,
    | new carbon reinforced shell, interior strap anchors and
    | RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5 piece in mold
    | shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970
    "hairnet" helmet or its equivalent. I thought there was
    some test these things had to pass but that must be a drop
    test, one in which you drop the helmet on the lawn to see
    if it falls apart.

    tinyurl.com3cp5c

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden]

  8. On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT, [email hidden] may

    have said:
    Miscatonic said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets
    that cost $189... forget it... you've apparently already
    fallen on your head and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week",
    there's an even pricier one now.

    tinyurl.com25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't
    that just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for
    the question of "one what?", we'll leave that to
    individual choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on
    | the lightest thing to come out of the wizard works of
    | Giro Helmets, yet. A huge lone star adorns this bright
    | red, white and blue brain cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel
    | vents, new carbon reinforced shell, interior strap
    | anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5 piece
    | in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970
    "hairnet" helmet or its equivalent. I thought there was
    some test these things had to pass but that must be a drop
    test, one in which you drop the helmet on the lawn to see
    if it falls apart.

    tinyurl.com3cp5c

    I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the
    pricing is that in a case where the purchaser is willing to
    pay the price for the helmet, the likelihood is smaller that
    there's anything to protect. (I think somebody else had a
    similar observation.)

    As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:

    If dropped, will it achieve these two results:

    1. Hit the ground.
    2. Not break.

    I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this
    morning, but it might have been amusing to see if there were
    any of the subject item atop riders.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  9. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT,

    may have said:
    Miscatonic said:

    > Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets
    > that cost $189... forget it... you've apparently
    > already fallen on your head and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week",
    there's an even pricier one now.

    tinyurl.com25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't
    that just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for
    the question of "one what?", we'll leave that to
    individual choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on
    | the lightest thing to come out of the wizard works of
    | Giro Helmets, yet. A huge lone star adorns this bright
    | red, white and blue brain cage. Featuring 26 wind
    | tunnel vents, new carbon reinforced shell, interior
    | strap anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a
    | 5 piece in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970
    "hairnet" helmet or its equivalent. I thought there was
    some test these things had to pass but that must be a
    drop test, one in which you drop the helmet on the lawn
    to see if it falls apart.

    tinyurl.com3cp5c

    I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the
    pricing is that in a case where the purchaser is willing
    to pay the price for the helmet, the likelihood is smaller
    that there's anything to protect. (I think somebody else
    had a similar observation.)

    As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:

    If dropped, will it achieve these two results:

    1. Hit the ground.
    2. Not break.

    It's not hard to search for info. Try this URL for a bit of
    info on helmet testing.
    cpsc.govregsumbicyclehelmets.pdf

    Marty

    Quoted message said:


    I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this
    morning, but it might have been amusing to see if there
    were any of the subject item atop riders.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying
    via e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  10. S. Anderson said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day
    above 15C this year. I was checking out the Michelin tires
    and was quite shocked to see the pricing. The Comp S
    tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to anyone? The
    Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone??
    Not sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay
    $20 extra not including different rims. And to me, $94 for
    a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My last motorcycle front
    was $124.

    I've had both of those tires, and neither one cost nearly
    that much. ($25 and $38 respectively) I think that shop's
    got too much markup.

    As for tubeless tires costing more money, I look at it this
    way... I rode my first pair of tubeless mountain bike tires
    for two years before getting a flat. In the previous two
    years, riding the same places and mileage, I probably went
    through at least eight tubes on each tire.

    8 x $4.50 = $36

    That $36 savings in tubes per tire justifies the usual $15-
    $30 difference in price between the tubeless and tubed
    version of most tires.

    --Kevin

  11. "Kevin Cullen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've had both of those tires, and neither one cost nearly
    that much. ($25 and $38 respectively) I think that shop's
    got too much markup.

    Perhaps..those are CDN dollars as well by the way. Still, a
    chunk of change for a tire I'll wear out in one year. And
    I'm sure that's MSRP, not street price. However, MSRP on one
    tire for my car is $96CDN, installed!

    Quoted message said:

    As for tubeless tires costing more money, I look at it
    this way... I rode my first pair of tubeless mountain bike
    tires for two years before getting a flat. In the previous
    two years, riding the same places and mileage, I probably
    went through at least eight tubes on each tire.

    I haven't flatted in 3 years. I've worn out 1 front and 3
    rears in that time. And you can always patch a tube. Seems
    like big bucks for a problem that doesn't need solving in my
    mind. Are they any lighter overall?? Tire seemed
    significantly heavier.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.