On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT, [email hidden] may
have said:Miscatonic said:Quoted message said:Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets
that cost $189... forget it... you've apparently already
fallen on your head and it's too late for you.
Quoted message said:Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week",
there's an even pricier one now.
tinyurl.com25l6nOpen ↗
Quoted message said:The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't
that just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for
the question of "one what?", we'll leave that to
individual choice.)
From that page:
| The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on
| the lightest thing to come out of the wizard works of
| Giro Helmets, yet. A huge lone star adorns this bright
| red, white and blue brain cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel
| vents, new carbon reinforced shell, interior strap
| anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5 piece
| in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.
It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970
"hairnet" helmet or its equivalent. I thought there was
some test these things had to pass but that must be a drop
test, one in which you drop the helmet on the lawn to see
if it falls apart.
tinyurl.com3cp5cOpen ↗
I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the
pricing is that in a case where the purchaser is willing to
pay the price for the helmet, the likelihood is smaller that
there's anything to protect. (I think somebody else had a
similar observation.)
As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:
If dropped, will it achieve these two results:
1. Hit the ground.
2. Not break.
I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this
morning, but it might have been amusing to see if there were
any of the subject item atop riders.
--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.