On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT, [email hidden] may
have said:Miscatonic said:Quoted message said:Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost
$189... forget it... you've apparently already fallen on your head
and it's too late for you.
Quoted message said:Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's an even
pricier one now.
http://tinyurl.com/25l6n
Quoted message said:The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't that just
inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the question of "one
what?", we'll leave that to individual choice.)
From that page:
| The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on the lightest
| thing to come out of the wizard works of Giro Helmets, yet. A huge
| lone star adorns this bright red, white and blue brain
| cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel vents, new carbon reinforced shell,
| interior strap anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5
| piece in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.
It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970 "hairnet" helmet or
its equivalent. I thought there was some test these things had to pass
but that must be a drop test, one in which you drop the helmet on the
lawn to see if it falls apart.
http://tinyurl.com/3cp5c
I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the pricing is
that in a case where the purchaser is willing to pay the price for the
helmet, the likelihood is smaller that there's anything to protect.
(I think somebody else had a similar observation.)
As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:
If dropped, will it achieve these two results:
1. Hit the ground.
2. Not break.
I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this morning, but it
might have been amusing to see if there were any of the subject item
atop riders.
--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.