Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Tubeless Tires

Started by S. Anderson · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,089 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
S. Anderson
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,089
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day above 15C this
    year. I was checking out the Michelin tires and was quite shocked to see
    the pricing. The Comp S tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to
    anyone? The Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone?? Not
    sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay $20 extra not including
    different rims. And to me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My
    last motorcycle front was $124.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

    --
    Scott Anderson

    ICBM: 43.41 N 79.38 W

  2. Scott Anderson said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day above 15C this
    year. I was checking out the Michelin tires and was quite shocked to see
    the pricing. The Comp S tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to
    anyone? The Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone?? Not
    sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay $20 extra not including
    different rims. And to me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My
    last motorcycle front was $124.

    If you take your bicycling seriously, cost is not an issue,... at
    least not one the modern bicyclist mentions. It's like the owner of a
    huge SUV complaining about the price of gasoline.

    Don't buy that stuff. Admit it, the stuff is way out of line in price
    and utility. When are we going to see the demise of all this
    extravagance? By the way, my truck is bigger than yours, has more
    expensive and larger wheels and has eight exhaust pipes. I can afford
    it, but maybe you can't. Ho Ho.

    Get tubeless tire$ now!

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  3. "S. Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day above 15C this
    year. I was checking out the Michelin tires and was quite shocked to see
    the pricing. The Comp S tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to
    anyone? The Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone??


    Not

    Quoted message said:

    sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay $20 extra not


    including

    Quoted message said:

    different rims. And to me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My
    last motorcycle front was $124.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

    --
    Scott Anderson

    ICBM: 43.41 N 79.38 W

    I see you've already heard from Jobst. On his recco a few years back I
    started riding Avocet Fasgrip TT 30 tires. They were awesome. Had to have
    my LBS special order them, but it was worth it since they cost at least $15
    less than what other tires were going for at the time. But alas ... Avocet
    got on the marketing glitz bandwagon and now all their stuff is sky high. I
    can't get the Fasgrip TT 30s here in rural SC anymore.

    So I buy up closeouts from the catalogs. My recent favorites have been
    Paribas ... made by Vredestein. Nashbar has them in their catalog for $25
    but they're only $15 on the website. They're awesome little tires. Oh ...
    you've gotta be willing to live with yellow. Still, nice tires --
    especially for the price.

    I'm a high mileage rider and I'm into having good equipment and all. I'm
    not a retro grouch or anything. But paying $50 for a tire, IMHO, is just
    stupid.

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost $189 ...
    forget it ... you've apparently already fallen on your head and it's too
    late for you.

    Bob C.

  4. On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:08:38 GMT, [email hidden], in

    a rare moment of humorous intent said:

    Don't buy that stuff. Admit it, the stuff is way out of line in price
    and utility. When are we going to see the demise of all this
    extravagance? By the way, my truck is bigger than yours, has more
    expensive and larger wheels and has eight exhaust pipes. I can afford
    it, but maybe you can't. Ho Ho.

    Get tubeless tire$ now!

    At least no one has yet marketed a bike wheel with a free-spinning
    decorative disc between the spoke rows.

    Of course, having mentioned the concept, I'm sure some style-driven
    marketing fool will be on the phone to a manufacturer in China to get
    the process rolling before Monday...if it hasn't already begun.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  5. On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:44:40 -0400, "psycholist"

    may have said:

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost $189 ...
    forget it ... you've apparently already fallen on your head and it's too
    late for you.

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's an even
    pricier one now.

    http://www.nashbar.com/results.cfm?category=91&subcategory=1045&storetype=&estoreid=&init=y&pagename=

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225!

    Doesn't that just inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the
    question of "one what?", we'll leave that to individual choice.)

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  6. On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:44:40 -0400, "psycholist"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Oh ... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost $189 ...
    forget it ... you've apparently already fallen on your head and it's too
    late for you.

    Amusing to see how the rhetoric has changed over time.

  7. Miscatonic said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost
    $189... forget it... you've apparently already fallen on your head
    and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's an even
    pricier one now.

    http://tinyurl.com/25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't that just
    inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the question of "one
    what?", we'll leave that to individual choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on the lightest
    | thing to come out of the wizard works of Giro Helmets, yet. A huge
    | lone star adorns this bright red, white and blue brain
    | cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel vents, new carbon reinforced shell,
    | interior strap anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5
    | piece in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970 "hairnet" helmet or
    its equivalent. I thought there was some test these things had to pass
    but that must be a drop test, one in which you drop the helmet on the
    lawn to see if it falls apart.

    http://tinyurl.com/3cp5c

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  8. On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT, [email hidden] may

    have said:
    Miscatonic said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost
    $189... forget it... you've apparently already fallen on your head
    and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's an even
    pricier one now.

    http://tinyurl.com/25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't that just
    inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the question of "one
    what?", we'll leave that to individual choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on the lightest
    | thing to come out of the wizard works of Giro Helmets, yet. A huge
    | lone star adorns this bright red, white and blue brain
    | cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel vents, new carbon reinforced shell,
    | interior strap anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5
    | piece in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970 "hairnet" helmet or
    its equivalent. I thought there was some test these things had to pass
    but that must be a drop test, one in which you drop the helmet on the
    lawn to see if it falls apart.

    http://tinyurl.com/3cp5c

    I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the pricing is
    that in a case where the purchaser is willing to pay the price for the
    helmet, the likelihood is smaller that there's anything to protect.
    (I think somebody else had a similar observation.)

    As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:

    If dropped, will it achieve these two results:

    1. Hit the ground.
    2. Not break.

    I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this morning, but it
    might have been amusing to see if there were any of the subject item
    atop riders.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  9. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:57:34 GMT, [email hidden] may

    have said:
    Miscatonic said:

    > Oh... and if anyone is buying those new Giro helmets that cost
    > $189... forget it... you've apparently already fallen on your head
    > and it's too late for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, but the merely $189 helmets are so "last week", there's an even
    pricier one now.

    http://tinyurl.com/25l6n

    Quoted message said:

    The "Lone Star Special Edition" is just $225! Doesn't that just
    inspire you to grab one immediately? (As for the question of "one
    what?", we'll leave that to individual choice.)

    From that page:

    | The latest statement of Texas pride (or Lance envy) on the lightest
    | thing to come out of the wizard works of Giro Helmets, yet. A huge
    | lone star adorns this bright red, white and blue brain
    | cage. Featuring 26 wind tunnel vents, new carbon reinforced shell,
    | interior strap anchors and RocLoc 4 fit system topped off with a 5
    | piece in mold shell. Helmet Pod included.

    It's nice to see we have returned to the pre 1970 "hairnet" helmet or
    its equivalent. I thought there was some test these things had to pass
    but that must be a drop test, one in which you drop the helmet on the
    lawn to see if it falls apart.

    http://tinyurl.com/3cp5c

    I have begun to hope that perhaps the reasoning behind the pricing is
    that in a case where the purchaser is willing to pay the price for the
    helmet, the likelihood is smaller that there's anything to protect.
    (I think somebody else had a similar observation.)

    As for the testing, I think it's restricted to this:

    If dropped, will it achieve these two results:

    1. Hit the ground.
    2. Not break.

    It's not hard to search for info.
    Try this URL for a bit of info on helmet testing.
    http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/regsumbicyclehelmets.pdf

    Marty

    Quoted message said:


    I didn't go out and watch the start of the MS150 this morning, but it
    might have been amusing to see if there were any of the subject item
    atop riders.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  10. S. Anderson said:

    Well I drifted down to a shop today, being the first day above 15C this
    year. I was checking out the Michelin tires and was quite shocked to see
    the pricing. The Comp S tubeless tire was $94. Does that seem odd to
    anyone? The Comp S tube tire was $74. Does THAT seem odd to anyone?? Not
    sure what the big deal is with tubeless, but you pay $20 extra not including
    different rims. And to me, $94 for a bicycle tire seems a bit much. My
    last motorcycle front was $124.

    I've had both of those tires, and neither one cost nearly that much.
    ($25 and $38 respectively) I think that shop's got too much markup.

    As for tubeless tires costing more money, I look at it this way... I
    rode my first pair of tubeless mountain bike tires for two years before
    getting a flat. In the previous two years, riding the same places and
    mileage, I probably went through at least eight tubes on each tire.

    8 x $4.50 = $36

    That $36 savings in tubes per tire justifies the usual $15-$30
    difference in price between the tubeless and tubed version of most tires.

    --Kevin

  11. "Kevin Cullen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've had both of those tires, and neither one cost nearly that much.
    ($25 and $38 respectively) I think that shop's got too much markup.

    Perhaps..those are CDN dollars as well by the way. Still, a chunk of change
    for a tire I'll wear out in one year. And I'm sure that's MSRP, not street
    price. However, MSRP on one tire for my car is $96CDN, installed!

    Quoted message said:

    As for tubeless tires costing more money, I look at it this way... I
    rode my first pair of tubeless mountain bike tires for two years before
    getting a flat. In the previous two years, riding the same places and
    mileage, I probably went through at least eight tubes on each tire.

    I haven't flatted in 3 years. I've worn out 1 front and 3 rears in that
    time. And you can always patch a tube. Seems like big bucks for a problem
    that doesn't need solving in my mind. Are they any lighter overall?? Tire
    seemed significantly heavier.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.