Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Tubeless road tires idea

Started by Phil, Squid-in-Training · · Last activity · 11 posts · 397 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 March 2005
Last activity
31 March 2005
Original author
Phil, Squid-in-Training
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
397
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.
    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  2. Phil said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    I think Vredestein et al have essentially solved the problem of flats
    for most people by using soft rubber layers (they claim the PRS tyres
    are twice as effective as Kevlar belts, which IME make for a
    horrid-riding tyre). I've been very impressed - one very slow puncture
    in 2500 miles, ridden in all sorts of conditions.

    One advantage I could see to tubeless tyres would be the ability to
    mount them with tools without the risk of trapping a tube. Some
    foldable tyres are a real struggle when new, although they all seem to
    stretch after a fortnight on the rim.

    Incidentally, the tubeless tyres used on cars have much lower air loss
    than tubed tyres. That's one of the reasons they were introduced.

  3. Phil said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    I think Vredestein et al have essentially solved the problem of flats
    for most people by using soft rubber layers (they claim the PRS tyres
    are twice as effective as Kevlar belts, which IME make for a
    horrid-riding tyre). I've been very impressed - one very slow puncture
    in 2500 miles, ridden in all sorts of conditions.

    One advantage I could see to tubeless tyres would be the ability to
    mount them with tools without the risk of trapping a tube. Some
    foldable tyres are a real struggle when new, although they all seem to
    stretch after a fortnight on the rim.

    Incidentally, the tubeless tyres used on cars have much lower air loss
    than tubed tyres. That's one of the reasons they were introduced.

  4. Squid-in-Training said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    YMMV, but for me, this would represent about triple the amount of time
    and effort that I spend fixing flats over the life of a tire given the
    continual need to add more latex. (Also, over time, would that
    continual addition process not make the wheel awfully heavy?)

    I'm sure there are people who would regard this as a wonderful thing.
    I'm not one of them.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  5. Squid-in-Training said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    YMMV, but for me, this would represent about triple the amount of time
    and effort that I spend fixing flats over the life of a tire given the
    continual need to add more latex. (Also, over time, would that
    continual addition process not make the wheel awfully heavy?)

    I'm sure there are people who would regard this as a wonderful thing.
    I'm not one of them.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  6. Phil said:

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    Looks easy enough to do, and worth a try.

    --
    "Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
    to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
    it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)

  7. Phil said:

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    Looks easy enough to do, and worth a try.

    --
    "Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
    to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
    it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)

  8. Werehatrack said:
    Squid-in-Training said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless
    w/slime? Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes,
    there doesn't seem to be a reason not to try it, especially if you
    get flats on a constant basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    YMMV, but for me, this would represent about triple the amount of time
    and effort that I spend fixing flats over the life of a tire given the
    continual need to add more latex. (Also, over time, would that
    continual addition process not make the wheel awfully heavy?)

    I'm sure there are people who would regard this as a wonderful thing.
    I'm not one of them.

    I'm not one of them, either, actually. I don't think the latex needs to be
    added forever...

    If one can use a sealed rim such as the Ksyrium SL (is the rim joint
    airtight?), the need for latex would not be that critical. No tubes, no
    pinch flats, but probably some air burping.

    Michelin's developing something like this, I think.
    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  9. Werehatrack said:
    Squid-in-Training said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless
    w/slime? Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes,
    there doesn't seem to be a reason not to try it, especially if you
    get flats on a constant basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    YMMV, but for me, this would represent about triple the amount of time
    and effort that I spend fixing flats over the life of a tire given the
    continual need to add more latex. (Also, over time, would that
    continual addition process not make the wheel awfully heavy?)

    I'm sure there are people who would regard this as a wonderful thing.
    I'm not one of them.

    I'm not one of them, either, actually. I don't think the latex needs to be
    added forever...

    If one can use a sealed rim such as the Ksyrium SL (is the rim joint
    airtight?), the need for latex would not be that critical. No tubes, no
    pinch flats, but probably some air burping.

    Michelin's developing something like this, I think.
    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  10. Squid-in-Training said:
    Werehatrack said:
    Squid-in-Training said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless

    If one can use a sealed rim such as the Ksyrium SL (is the rim joint
    airtight?), the need for latex would not be that critical. No tubes, no
    pinch flats, but probably some air burping.

    Michelin's developing something like this, I think.

    I think the Michelin tyre has already been tested by pro teams, and
    Mavic designed the Ksyrium to be tubeless compatible from the start -
    that FORE drilling technique seems a bit pointless unless you
    absolutely have to avoid penetrating the tyre bed.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  11. Phil said:

    Would anybody feel comfortable converting a road tire to tubeless w/slime?
    Other than a higher air diffusion rate than with tubes, there doesn't seem
    to be a reason not to try it, especially if you get flats on a constant
    basis.

    This link shows how to convert to tubeless on a MTB:
    http://www.nsmb.com/gear/tubeless_12_04.php

    I was thinking the same could be done for road.

    Since the advantage of tubeless on a MTB is no pinch flats for less air,
    and knowing that less air on a road bike is a BAD idea, why?

    'Flats on a constant basis'? Need to find out why, and fix that problem.
    Flats on tubeless is a MUCH bigger problem and much harder to fix on the
    road(impossible w/o adding a tube).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.