Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Thanks
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Thanks
Scott Smith said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Thanks
yes
It'll work, but it's outside specs.
"Scott Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Thanks
Jerry Bone Jr said:It'll work, but it's outside specs.
Of course only a top poster would think that tubes are all
manufactured to the same sizes.
Greg
Quoted message said:"Scott Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Thanks
--
Destroy your safe and happy lives Before it is too late The
battles we fought were long and hard Just not to be consumed
by rock'n'roll
G.T. said:Jerry Bone Jr said:It'll work, but it's outside specs.
Of course only a top poster would think that tubes are all
manufactured to the same sizes.Greg
Harsh.
John
Scott Smith said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and more
prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over, but a good
reason to run the "right size" tubes if you can get 'em.
Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home of
the $695 ti frame
"Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Scott Smith said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and more
prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over, but a good
reason to run the "right size" tubes if you can get 'em.Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home
of the $695 ti frame
Mark has opened the door. Who's smart enough to tell us: How
much thinner is it?
I'm loosing sleep.
--
DTW .../\.../\.../\...
I've spent most of my money on mountain biking and windsurfing.
The rest I've just wasted
"D T W .../\..." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Scott Smith said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and
more prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over, but
a good reason to run the "right size" tubes if you can
get 'em.Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗
Home of the $695 ti frameMark has opened the door. Who's smart enough to tell us:
How much thinner is it?
Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the tube will be
7/10 the thickness of whatever the hell that is.
Steve.
"spademan o---[) *"
<[email hidden]> wrote in
message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"D T W .../\..." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:"Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:"Scott Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and
more prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over,
but a good reason to run the "right size" tubes if you
can get 'em.Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗
Home of the $695 ti frameMark has opened the door. Who's smart enough to tell us:
How much thinner is it?Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the tube will
be 7/10 the thickness of whatever the hell that is.Steve.
Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm, so a
1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick, less
than the thickness of super-lightweight time trial inner
tubes (.6mm)...
Steve <goes off to check inner tubes...
snip'
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
Mark has opened the door. Who's smart enough to tell
us: How
much
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:thinner is it?
Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the tube
will be 7/10 the thickness of whatever the hell that is.Steve.
Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm, so
a
Quoted message said:1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick,
less than the thickness of super-lightweight time trial
inner tubes (.6mm)...Steve <goes off to check inner tubes...>
Steve, I hope that your not at work doing all of this
research ;-) Me, I'm home with a back spasm.
Quoted message said:--
btw I don't agree with the 7/10 calculation. Not that I know
the answer ;-)
Yes 1.5 is @ 7/10 of 2.1 but does it stretch and thin out
30%?
"learn something every day"
DTW .../\.../\.../\...
I've spent most of my money on mountain biking and
windsurfing. The rest I've just wasted.
Mark Hickey said:Scott Smith said:Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and more
prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over, but a good
reason to run the "right size" tubes if you can get 'em.
Considering the lack of consistency amongst tube
manufacturers that's not going to be a big issue in this
case. As, I think, crazywebtver mentioned, you wouldn't want
to run a 26 x 1.25/1.5 tube in a 26 x 2.5 tire but Scott
Smith's combo shouldn't be a problem at all.
Greg
--
Destroy your safe and happy lives Before it is too late The
battles we fought were long and hard Just not to be consumed
by rock'n'roll
spademan o---) * said:"spademan o---[) *" <steve.eckersley@NOSPAMPLEASEWEREBRIT-
ISH.its.lancscc.gov.uk> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:"D T W .../\..." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:"Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...>"Scott Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>>Will a 26 x 1.5/2.0 work in a 26 x 2.1 ?
>
>Yes, but the tube walls will be somewhat thinner, and
>more prone to puncture. Nothing to lose sleep over, but
>a good reason to run the "right size" tubes if you can
>get 'em.
>
>Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗
>Home of the $695 ti frameMark has opened the door. Who's smart enough to tell us:
How much thinner is it?Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the tube will
be 7/10 the thickness of whatever the hell that is.Steve.
Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm, so a
1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick,
less than the thickness of super-lightweight time trial
inner tubes (.6mm)...
Except that it's not a 1.5, it's a 1.5/2.0 so who knows the
actual size.
Greg
--
Destroy your safe and happy lives Before it is too late The
battles we fought were long and hard Just not to be consumed
by rock'n'roll
"spademan o---[\) *"
Quoted message said:Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm, so a
1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick,
less than the thickness of super-lightweight time trial
inner tubes (.6mm)...Steve <goes off to check inner tubes...>
Assuming the tubes are actually crafted for those two
actual sizes
(1.5" and 2.1"😉 that would be a fairly good assumption.
Only it gets more complicated by the fact that the more a
tube stretches, the less consistent it is - there will be
"thin spots" that are even thinner than the 0.57mm (or
whatever the "average" is).
Again, probably not enough to cause widespread flooding and
hail, but something else to consider. That could actually
matter when there's a nasty little thorn trying to poke
through the tube.
Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home of
the $695 ti frame
spademan o---) * said:Quoted message said:Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the tube will
be 7/10 the thickness of whatever the hell that is.Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm, so a
1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick,
less than the thickness of super-lightweight time trial
inner tubes (.6mm)...
Slow day at the office?
--
a.m-b FAQ: j-harris.netambfaq.htmOpen ↗
b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htmOpen ↗
"bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:03:48 +0100, spademan o---[)
* said:Quoted message said:Well 2.1 compared to 1.5 is roughly 7/10 so the
tube will be 7/10 the thickness of whatever the
hell that is.Google reveals standard MTB inner tubes have a wall
thickness of .8mm,
so a
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:1.5 inner tube in a 2.1 tyre will only be 0.57mm thick,
less than the thickness of super-lightweight time
trial inner tubes (.6mm)...Slow day at the office?
This is my job, I trawl newsgroups looking for simple
mathematical problems and then search google for answers.
I'm still waiting for m first pay-check but It doesn't worry
me because I've managed to find this fantastic deal some
Nigerian fellow is offering for just
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.