Power meters · Public discussion

TSS score

Started by the holster · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,968 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
24 October 2005
Last activity
26 October 2005
Original author
the holster
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,968
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just got cycling peaks software, how do you use the tss score to benefit your training and peaking process.

  2. On a basic level, you can use the TSS to manage your overall training volume/intensity and recovery needs. By providing a value which combines the intensity and volume of any given ride, it becomes easier to see when recovery rides or days off (and how many) should be taken to balance the training strain. Discussions on another forum indicated that people were capable of training for extended periods at 700-900 TSS points per week without suffering from overtraining, so you can develop a workout plan for the season which is somewhat balance overall. See also: peakscoachinggroup.comPowerTrainingChapter.pdf -- last paragraph of page 11 and beyond.

    As far as using TSS for peaking and such, the developers are keeping that trick up their sleeve for now, but have hinted that a new "Training Manager" product is being worked on to assist with periodizing, and peaking for seasonal goals. Hope this helps.

  3. Like The Holster I too have recently begun using a PT Pro.
    I found the TSS score article very useful in helping me understand better how to use the tool.

    What I am astounded at is the variability in power over a relatively flat course when pedalling at a steady cadence (thank you R&B music), steady speed and steady HR.

    I know this is a bit off topic but I find the cadence on the PT Pro with a cadence sensor fitted is widely fluctuating and 141 seems a favourite number. I wonder if the sensor is just not set properly?

    Following the forum with interest.

    Ian

  4. man5e said:

    Like The Holster I too have recently begun using a PT Pro.
    I found the TSS score article very useful in helping me understand better how to use the tool.

    What I am astounded at is the variability in power over a relatively flat course when pedalling at a steady cadence (thank you R&B music), steady speed and steady HR.

    I know this is a bit off topic but I find the cadence on the PT Pro with a cadence sensor fitted is widely fluctuating and 141 seems a favourite number. I wonder if the sensor is just not set properly?

    Following the forum with interest.

    Ian


    If it is fluctuating, make sure(in PT head setup) your settings are to use 'crank' and then 'hub'. I am using the hub virtual cadence only right now, and it fluctuates quite a bit but averages nicely. Too bad I couldn't only chose to smooth cadence in cyclingpeaks.

  5. Spunout said:

    If it is fluctuating, make sure(in PT head setup) your settings are to use 'crank' and then 'hub'.


    If only that were an option. 🙁 I installed my cadence sensor for the first time the other night and tried to set it up the way you described. The 3 options are: default (Hub, *then* pedal), pedal only, and hub only.

  6. frenchyge said:

    If only that were an option. 🙁 I installed my cadence sensor for the first time the other night and tried to set it up the way you described. The 3 options are: default (Hub, *then* pedal), pedal only, and hub only.

    Sorry, was going from memory, I am probably wrong.

    If you have the cadence sensor installed, then use pedal only.

  7. Hi,

    My PT was set up to read hub then pedal so I have changed it to pedal only.
    Am sure that it will make a difference.

    Oh that flattening to watts curve was as easy :eek:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.