Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Truth in advertising???

Started by Gags · · Last activity · 20 posts · 1,605 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
3 February 2008
Last activity
7 February 2008
Original author
Gags
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,605
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP???? I don't think
    so!!!

    http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#

  2. "Gags" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP???? I don't
    think so!!!

    http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#

    Do Shimano still *do* 7spd rear cassettes?

  3. Resound said:

    "Gags" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP????   I don't
    think so!!!

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#

    Do Shimano still *do* 7spd rear cassettes?

    Dunno, but they certainly still make 7-speed freewheels. ;-)

    When I saw $1495 and graysonline, my first thought was "I wonder how
    many of them are in the lot?" ;-)

    BTH

  4. Gags said:

    Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP???? I don't think
    so!!!

    http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#


    Isn't `truth in advertising' an oxymoron to start with?

  5. BT Humble said:
    Resound said:

    "Gags" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP???? I don't
    think so!!!
    http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#


    Do Shimano still *do* 7spd rear cassettes?

    Dunno, but they certainly still make 7-speed freewheels. ;-)

    When I saw $1495 and graysonline, my first thought was "I wonder how
    many of them are in the lot?" ;-)

    BTH

    An apparently it's a RACING bike! Ha! You wouldn't just be laughed out
    of the bunch with a bike like that, you'd be spat out! Clipping in looks
    a bit hard for starters!

  6. Bean Long said:
    BTHumble said:
    Resound said:

    "Gags" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Check out the description on these bikes......$1495 ORP????   I don't
    > think so!!!
    >http://www.graysonline.com.au/lot.asp?LOT_ID=2344132#
    Do Shimano still *do* 7spd rear cassettes?

    Quoted message said:

    Dunno, but they certainly still make 7-speed freewheels. ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    When I saw $1495 and graysonline, my first thought was "I wonder how
    many of them are in the lot?" ;-)

    An apparently it's a RACING bike! Ha! You wouldn't just be laughed out
    of the bunch with a bike like that, you'd be spat out! Clipping in looks
    a bit hard for starters!

    Now now, I reckon it'd be a good club racing bike for the likes of
    Lance Armstrong - you'd probably have to make him carry some ballast
    as well, though. ;-)

    Having a look at image #6, I really do suspect that it has a screw-on
    freewheel. Especially likely given the steel triple chainring,
    plastic platform pedals and claw-mounted rear derailleur. Those
    brakes look pretty nasty, too.

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    BTH

  7. In aus.bicycle on Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:15:33 -0800 (PST)

    BT Humble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    Have you any idea how much a sprocket weighs?

    Save .43 grams by carbon fibre bar tape, and you want to add a
    whole sprocket?

    Zebee

  8. On 2008-02-04, Zebee Johnstone (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    In aus.bicycle on Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:15:33 -0800 (PST)

    BT Humble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    Have you any idea how much a sprocket weighs?

    Save .43 grams by carbon fibre bar tape, and you want to add a
    whole sprocket?

    Does suck to drop a chain though, especially in the middle of a bunch.
    Pity deda fangs (or the like) don't come standard on the kind of bikes
    that have triples. I had to jury rig mine on, because it was too
    small for the seat tube, despite it being the largest one available.
    Haven't dropped a chain since.

    Harder to set up precisely and reliably too - mis-shifts are very
    common on triples.

    And finally, triples always seem to be on 8 speed bikes. Why not just
    go 10 speed with a double?

    --
    TimC
    Chuck Norris stops his fixie by putting his beard on the front tire.
    ....and he'd kill you with his bare hands for mentioning yourself in the
    same sentence. -- Donga in aus.bicycle

  9. BT Humble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    I have several roadie friends with triples. Mind you, the people I know
    that have them don't really need them. For most roadies its unneeded
    gearing. I know others with compact cranks to sort out the low end. It's
    all personal preference. In a race situation you'd only ever use the
    triple during disastrously steep hill-climbing scenarios (we have quite
    a few in CBR)and even then there'd be someone grinding out in a bigger
    gear and sailing past you up the hill while you spin.

  10. "BT Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    I have a loathing for triple front chainrings, but I throw away the large
    one, not the small one. See, for example,
    http://www.cyclofiend.com/cc/2007/cc301-nickpayne0507.html.

    As for roadies not liking/using triple rings, in a road race you either keep
    up with the bunch or you might as well not be there, and you certainly won't
    manage it if you drop down to the granny ring. Plus having the 3rd chainring
    there buggers up the chainline for the two large rings.

    Nick

  11. Owwww my eyes.. and ears.... bad bikes, talk of triples, even pics of crippled triples made into doubles! :eek: :eek:

    😄

  12. BT Humble said:


    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?

    BTH

    My touring bike and my mountain bike have triples, but it is so much
    nicer and smoother to change the double on my racing bike that I'd be
    very reluctant to give that up. One day soon I'll move to a compact, but
    if it gets too steep for that then that's just too bad!

  13. gplama said:

    Owwww my eyes.. and ears.... bad bikes, talk of triples, even pics of crippled triples made into doubles! :eek: :eek:

    😄


    Ah shadup, I've got a triple, but in it's defence it was built to suit personal specs.

    BTW - who got the bluddy Cinder Bikes spam last week? Must of deleted it at least 20 times before TB realised it was spam.

  14. BT Humble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical basis?
    BTH

    I loathe doubles too. Next you'll be trying to convince us you need more than one ring on the rear.

    Parbs

  15. kanangara said:
    BTHumble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings?  Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?
    BTH

    I loathe doubles too. Next you'll be trying to convince us you need
    more than one ring on the rear.

    Word! You the man, dude! ;-)

    BTH

  16. On Feb 5, 4:05 pm, kanangara <kanangara.34a...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    BT Humble said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?
    BTH

    I loathe doubles too. Next you'll be trying to convince us you need
    more than one ring on the rear.

    Parbs

    --
    kanangara

    Damn right. The bike I rode today has only one chainring up front and
    one sprocket out back. Mind you, I still have 8 ratios to choose
    from :-D

  17. Quoted message said:

    On Feb 5, 4:05 pm, kanangara <kanangara.34a...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    BT Humble Wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why do roadies have such a loathing for triple front
    chainrings? Is it just a machismo thing, or does it have some logical
    basis?
    BTH

    Quoted message said:

    I loathe doubles too. Next you'll be trying to convince us you need
    more than one ring on the rear.

    Quoted message said:

    Parbs

    Quoted message said:

    --
    kanangara

    Damn right. The bike I rode today has only one chainring up front and
    one sprocket out back. Mind you, I still have 8 ratios to choose
    from :-D

    Is it my imagination, or is there a rash of extremely [censored] road bikes
    being touted online at the moment? This Interweb thingy has a lot to
    answer for.

    You could buy the same thing at any department store for $150 on
    special. It's a complete turd. $1450 - for that you'd get at least
    Tiagra STI, probably a full groupset from a run of the mill bike shop.
    Who are they actually sucking in?

  18. not all there said:

    Is it my imagination, or is there a rash of extremely [censored] road bikes
    being touted online at the moment? This Interweb thingy has a lot to
    answer for.

    You could buy the same thing at any department store for $150 on
    special. It's a complete turd. $1450 - for that you'd get at least
    Tiagra STI, probably a full groupset from a run of the mill bike shop.
    Who are they actually sucking in?

    Probably a sample drawn from that population who are adding one to
    their number every minute.

    BTH
    (Was that too abstract?)

  19. not all there said:

    You could buy the same thing at any department store for $150 on
    special. It's a complete turd. $1450 - for that you'd get at least
    Tiagra STI, probably a full groupset from a run of the mill bike shop.
    Who are they actually sucking in?

    Yeah, it's quite laughable. I bought my 2005 Giant TCR2 with full 9spd
    105 (hence a price reduction) for $1399. I race with it and it's a very
    good bike IMO. The one these guys are selling is a worthless piece of
    [censored] and they want THAT much for it! Sheesh!

  20. BT Humble said:

    Probably a sample drawn from that population who are adding one to
    their number every minute.

    BTH
    (Was that too abstract?)

    P.T. Barnum, unless I'm mistaken.

    --
    John
    Tragically I was an only twin. -- Peter Cook

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.