Home UK and Europe Triples
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section UK and Europe
Published 26 September 2003
Last activity 3 October 2003
Original author Pete @ Eclipse
Posts 42
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 1,802
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–20 of 42 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Pete @ Eclipse
Archived post
26 September 2003, 18:24 UTC
#1
Well......
Three months ago, I went to a mid summer party / 40th birthday bash. Foolishly I got a bit drunk and agreed to cycle up Mt Ventoux.
I've just got back from Provence, were three of us cycled up Mt Ventoux, not once, not twice, but three times (South, East and North routes) in three days.
We may have also had three bottles of champagne to celebrate. (there seems to be a three theme here.....)
We saw a large number of other cyclists struggling up Ventoux; many using an exceptionally little triple front ring.
As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride; but not with a triple !
With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
Zog The Undenia
Archived post
26 September 2003, 18:24 UTC
#2
Pete @ eclipse said: With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
But did you have a 28 on the back? I used to get laughed at for having a 23!
Wafflydirtycatl
Archived post
26 September 2003, 18:24 UTC
#3
Quoted message said: With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
Hey! I love my granny ring!
Besides which, it's a good feeling that when you are gradually getting fit, you work up from dismounting & walking bike up hill to going up in granny ring and then going up without having to go into granny ring! I love my granny ring!
Cheers, helen s
~~~~~~~~~~ This is sent from a redundant email Mail sent to it is dumped My correct one can be gleaned from h*$el***$$n*$d$ot$**s**i$$m*$m$**on**$s$@*$$a**$*ol*$*.*$$c$om*$ by getting rid of the overdependence on money and fame ~~~~~~~~~~
26 September 2003, 18:24 UTC
#4
Pete @ eclipse said: With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
Winker!
~PB
26 September 2003, 18:24 UTC
#5
"Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: Well...... As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride; but not with a triple !
With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
Very good, you're jolly hard and I'm a wimp.
I've got about much respect for you as you have for those who aren't as strong as you.
Is that enough of a flame?
clive
26 September 2003, 18:46 UTC
#6
"Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: Well......
Three months ago, I went to a mid summer party / 40th birthday bash. Foolishly I got a bit drunk and agreed to cycle up Mt Ventoux.
I've just got back from Provence, were three of us cycled up Mt Ventoux,
not
Quoted message said: once, not twice, but three times (South, East and North routes) in three days.
We may have also had three bottles of champagne to celebrate. (there seems to be a three theme here.....)
We saw a large number of other cyclists struggling up Ventoux; many using
an
Quoted message said: exceptionally little triple front ring.
As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride; but not with a triple !
With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Graham
Digweed .. ;\)
Archived post
26 September 2003, 18:46 UTC
#7
Pete @ eclipse tried to scribble ...
Quoted message said: With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
Heheheh ... I dunno about that, many Mountain bikers would disagree I guess .. 😉
-- Digweed '79 Beamish RL 250, '85 Swift Corvette, '88 Ford Escort 1.6 Ghia, '95 Dyna-Tech CroMo Comp, '97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi, '02 Schumacher CAT 3000, '03 Losi Kinwald Triple-X, Escort for Auction tinyurl.com osdj Open ↗ '03 Associated RC10 B4 .... 😉
Marnie Crittle
Archived post
26 September 2003, 19:20 UTC
#8
snip
Quoted message said: You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Graham
I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
26 September 2003, 22:24 UTC
#9
Pete @ eclipse said: Well......
I did Ventoux in 94 on 39x24, that same trip I climbed the Aubisque, Tourmalet, Glandon/Croix de Fer, Alpe d'Huez and Columbiere. Couldn't do it now though on the same set up.
26 September 2003, 22:25 UTC
#10
"Marnie Crittle" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: snip
Quoted message said: You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Graham
I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
Oh yes I have ! I bet it's better than yours !
Graham
Kenneth Clement
Archived post
26 September 2003, 22:25 UTC
#11
"Graham" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: "Marnie Crittle" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: snip
Quoted message said: You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Graham
I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
Oh yes I have ! I bet it's better than yours !
Graham
So you are a troll then! GOTCHA!
Marnie.
Chris French
Archived post
26 September 2003, 22:49 UTC
#12
In message <[email hidden]>, Graham <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said: "Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride; but not with a triple !
With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Pahh!! you pansies, stuff your multi-geared set-ups, 'Real cyclists' would dream of using nothing but a fixed gear. -- Chris French, Leeds
26 September 2003, 22:49 UTC
#13
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
Oh yes I have ! I bet it's better than yours !
Well my Daddy's got a Luger.
John
Patrick Herring
Archived post
26 September 2003, 23:29 UTC
#14
[email hidden] (wafflyDIRTYcatLITTERhcsBOX) wrote:
| >With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-) | | Hey! I love my granny ring! | | Besides which, it's a good feeling that when you are gradually getting fit, you work up from | dismounting & walking bike up hill to going up in granny ring and then going up without having to | go into granny ring! I love my granny ring!
Entirely agree, except I never allowed myself to dismount, except under extreme provocation, usually alcohol related.
-- Patrick Herring, Sheffield, UK anweald.co.uk anweald.co.uk Open ↗
Patrick Herring
Archived post
26 September 2003, 23:29 UTC
#15
chris French <[email hidden]> wrote:
| In message <[email hidden]>, Graham <[email hidden]> writes | > | >"Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message | >"]news:[email hidden]... | >> | >> As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride; but not with a triple ! | >> | >> With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-) | >> | >> | > You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk. | > | | Pahh!! you pansies, stuff your multi-geared set-ups, 'Real cyclists' would dream of using nothing | but a fixed gear.
Yeah, you never saw a penny-farthing rider get up on the pedals.
-- Patrick Herring, Sheffield, UK anweald.co.uk anweald.co.uk Open ↗
26 September 2003, 23:29 UTC
#16
"Eatmorepies" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
Oh yes I have ! I bet it's better than yours !
Well my Daddy's got a Luger.
John
Does it have a triple though ?
Graham
26 September 2003, 23:29 UTC
#17
"Kenneth Clements" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: "Graham" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: "Marnie Crittle" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: snip > You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk. > > Graham
I bet this troll Graham hasn't even got a bike.
Marnie
Oh yes I have ! I bet it's better than yours !
Graham
So you are a troll then! GOTCHA!
Marnie.
In what way have you "got me" ?
Graham
Pete @ Eclipse
Archived post
27 September 2003, 10:58 UTC
#18
Good one. I struggled up Ventoux on 42*27. Chuffed I did it. Surprised at the number of people riding triple rings (hence my, somewhat, ironic post)
Not sure what to try next summer. Tourmalet,sounds good
"M Series" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: Pete @ eclipse said: Well......
I did Ventoux in 94 on 39x24, that same trip I climbed the Aubisque, Tourmalet, Glandon/Croix de Fer, Alpe d'Huez and Columbiere. Couldn't do
it
Quoted message said: now though on the same set up.
Pete @ Eclipse
Archived post
27 September 2003, 10:58 UTC
#19
I certainly dreamt of using a fixed gear. Woke up in a cold sweat !! I'll stick with my 18 gears !
"chris French" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: In message <[email hidden]>, Graham <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said: "Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: As Ventoux veterans (no triples!) we urge you all to get out and ride;
but
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: Quoted message said: not with a triple !
With the risk of being flamed.... triples are for wimps ;-)
You said it ! Don't get a triple and never get off and walk.
Pahh!! you pansies, stuff your multi-geared set-ups, 'Real cyclists' would dream of using nothing but a fixed gear. -- Chris French, Leeds
27 September 2003, 11:38 UTC
#20
"Pete @ eclipse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Wimp, wimp. I admit it.
Hell, if the technology exists to make something achievable that would not otherwise be possible for an individual then why not use it?
The brave, foolish or extremely talented can then boast that they did it without the frowned upon 'technical aids'.
T
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.