Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Triple or Double?

Started by rt1965 · · Last activity · 23 posts · 2,903 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 July 2006
Last activity
1 August 2006
Original author
rt1965
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,903
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. rt1965 said:

    Well, I've already bought the bike and I did have it converted to a compact double. They did have to change the front derailer, and the shifter on top of the crankset. All is well, the bike is fantastic. I am going back tomorrow for a full fitting.


    I think it's also be worth your while to buy a 12x25 or 12x27 rear casette for really hilly rides.

  2. rt1965 said:

    Well, I've already bought the bike and I did have it converted to a compact double. They did have to change the front derailer, and the shifter on top of the crankset. All is well, the bike is fantastic. I am going back tomorrow for a full fitting.

    I presume that the reason you want to train in the Flagstaff area is to get away from the HEAT!

    FWIW. This is after-the-fact since you just mounted the compact crank on your bike -- I just (as in, over the past weekend) mounted a cassette with an 11-32t cassette in a frame with a short cage 105 rear derailleur & 52/39 double crankset -- the center of the particular derailleur hanger bolt is 3cm from the axle center -- the short cage rear derailleur (to MY surprise) has enough capacity to handle the chain. That's a pretty low combination which I know is good enough for riding on mountain roads; but, obviously not quite as low as with most triple setups. You may never need to use anything larger than the 28t in the cassette, but the 32t will be a good bail-out cog to have in reserve.

    While it isn't as good as having a compact crank, you could always mount a 38t 130BCD inner chainring on a standard road crank; so, I would certainly try a cassette with a 32t cog before opting for the triple ...

    If you run a slightly longer chain which can accomodate the 52t-or-53t chainring & 32t cog, then you can just swap cassettes as needed ...

    FWIW2. Unless you are planning on riding EAST, SOUTH or WEST of Flagstaff, it's probably FLATTER than you think/remember ... it seems pretty FLAT (to me when I am IN A CAR) as you head NORTH to the Canyon. It will probably be WINDY ...

  3. alfeng said:

    FWIW. This is after-the-fact since you just mounted the compact crank on your bike -- I just (as in, over the past weekend) mounted a cassette with an 11-32t cassette in a frame with a short cage 105 rear derailleur & 52/39 double crankset -- the center of the particular derailleur hanger bolt is 3cm from the axle center -- the short cage rear derailleur (to MY surprise) has enough capacity to handle the chain. That's a pretty low combination which I know is good enough for riding on mountain roads; but, obviously not quite as low as with most triple setups. You may never need to use anything larger than the 28t in the cassette, but the 32t will be a good bail-out cog to have in reserve.

    Actually that 39/32 is very, very close in roll-out to the 30/26 which is my bottom gear on the triple. I should have thought of that solution before I invested in converting to the triple for the mountains! Got to say I wouldn't have wanted anything any higher in the Alps a couple of weeks ago. I really thought the 30/26 would give me a couple of bailout gears, but in the end the climbs are so long (Joux-Plane was 12km straight up) that I spent most of my time in bottom gear and if I'd had another couple of lower gears I'd have used them too! But I like to spin rather than mash, so a masher might have found my gears too low.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.