Bike buying advice · Public discussion

Trek vs Scott

Started by stuart24681012 · · Last activity · 10 posts · 18,232 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Bike buying advice
Published
12 July 2012
Last activity
16 July 2012
Original author
stuart24681012
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
18,232
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. hey, im 15 and i train about 5 days a the week. i've had a giant ocr 1 for about 4 years now and im looking for a new road bike.
    i have done heaps of research and i have narrowed it down to a trek madone 4.7 and a scott foil 40. Now im stuck as to which bike i should get. they are both great bikes and i cant chose. i havnt ridden either of them yet but i was hoping you guys could help make my choice a little easier. if it helps at all im an enduro rider and prefer mountains. thanks stuart.

  2. Hi Stuart, it sounds like you are excited about riding and have done your homework on your next bike. Those are both good brands and good bikes and I doubt anyone could tell you why one would be definitively better than the other. Any advice would likely just be an opinion, ultimately your's of which matters the most.

    Personally I like the Scott because of the very cool looking seatcluster. It is supposedly more aerodynamic too, but to be honest after having ridden so many years I know most of that is marketing language and is relatively insignificant in the real world outside of pro competition. It will not be perceptable on the road and would probably make little or no difference even in amateur competition, especially in a road race.

    The Scott is slightly more agressive, by that I mean it has a slightly shorter headtube and all things being the same (stem angle, number of headset spacers), the Scott will have you 10mm lower. At your age this shouldn't mean much. Old geezers who don't stretch should be more concerned.

  3. Rek and Gary fisher have pretty terrible after sales in this country, while Scott are pretty great down here.
    Some point :
    1-I'm looking for the pros and cons.
    2-I will be riding on streets and a little bit of trails but mostly streets.
    3-Unique and one of a kind bikes from
    Cannondale, Cinelli, and Kestrel

  4. Thanks heaps for the advice it has been very useful, but im tending towards the trek. I dont know I might change my mind after riding them.
    all the best Stuart.

  5. Quote:Originally Posted by stuart24681012 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG] hey, im 15 ... and im looking for a new road bike.

    FWIW & IMO. If you haven't stopped growing ... and, the odds are that you have not ...

    AND, you haven't outgrown your current bike's frame ...

    THEN, IMO, you would be much better spending either YOUR or YOUR PARENT's money on a set of better wheels + a set of Campagnolo shifters.

    The wheels & shifters can always migrate to the "new" bike when you truly need a larger sized frame.

  6. FYI. Not definitive, but probably worth the few minutes it will take for you to read this:

    http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/article/best-road-bikes-under-1000-32772/

  7. like i [FONT=calibri]originally[/FONT] said, i have had my bike for 4 years now. I got it when i was in year six and i am now in year nine. So i have grown quite [FONT=calibri]significantly[/FONT]. I have norrowed it down to wanting to these two bikes. I was looking for some info that would help me in deciding which bike i would get not someone telling me i shouldnt get a new bike. i dont mean to be harsh but im sure you can understand.

  8. The word on the street and from magazine journos is that the Scott Foil's ride is not exactly comfortable. In other words it's supposed to have a bit of an unforgiving ride. I've not pedaled a Foil, so I can't say how valid the prevailing opinion is. Have looked at Neil Pryde's bikes? They're getting a lot of excellent reviews. I don't ride a Neil Pryde, FYI. My scooter is a Look.

  9. Quote:Originally Posted by stuart24681012 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG] like i [FONT=calibri]originally[/FONT] said, i have had my bike for 4 years now. I got it when i was in year six and i am now in year nine. So i have grown quite [FONT=calibri]significantly[/FONT]. I have norrowed it down to wanting to these two bikes. I was looking for some info that would help me in deciding which bike i would get not someone telling me i shouldnt get a new bike. i dont mean to be harsh but im sure you can understand.

    No worries ...

    You are not the first individual (nor will you be the last) who is simply looking for validation for a predetermined choice who then is a little miffed when someone doesn't offer said validation.

  10. Quoted post said:

    Originally Posted by stuart24681012 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]

    like i [FONT= calibri]originally[/FONT] said, i have had my bike for 4 years now. I got it when i was in year six and i am now in year nine. So i have grown quite [FONT= calibri]significantly[/FONT]. I have norrowed it down to wanting to these two bikes. I was looking for some info that would help me in deciding which bike i would get not someone telling me i shouldnt get a new bike. i dont mean to be harsh but im sure you can understand.


    Lol! You can imagine how the poor chap who asked about 2 very specific different types of intervals on the Power forum felt after he was told "you just need to ride more".

    Keep us posted.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.