Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Trek Fuel 80.......again

Started by TonyP · · Last activity · 26 posts · 3,066 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
15 January 2005
Last activity
20 January 2005
Original author
TonyP
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,066
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–26 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Chris Glidden said:

    Yup. It's the 2nd right coming down Westridge from Top of the World


    in

    Quoted message said:

    between Mathis and Lynx.


    I need to get down there onea these days.

    JD

  2. small change said:
    TonyP said:

    Thanks for that Shawn and now I realise that the weight of the bike
    isn't everything.

    Just one more question.
    Are the new 2005 frames weak or badly designed?

    If the frame is no good then I won't bother to put an expensive


    fork

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or better crankset on the bike.

    Thanks.

    you could always refer back to JD's posts.

    What? The one where I say you can't make a silk purse out of a pig's
    ear?

    JD

  3. "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    small change said:
    TonyP said:

    Thanks for that Shawn and now I realise that the weight of the bike
    isn't everything.

    Just one more question.
    Are the new 2005 frames weak or badly designed?

    If the frame is no good then I won't bother to put an expensive


    fork

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or better crankset on the bike.

    Thanks.

    you could always refer back to JD's posts.

    What? The one where I say you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's
    ear?


    I liked the chamois dryer post.

  4. "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Chris Glidden said:

    Yup. It's the 2nd right coming down Westridge from Top of the World


    in

    Quoted message said:

    between Mathis and Lynx.


    I need to get down there onea these days.

    JD


    Any time. There's not the elevation gain or length that you're used to but
    you can piece a fun 15-20 mile ride in with the different trail options. I
    bet the LoSoCal boys would venture north as well.

  5. TonyP said:

    The bike weighs 30lbs and I 'd like to get it to about 28 lbs if possible.
    It rides very well.

    What is the best way to lighten the bike?


    take off the seat and handlebars ;-) then you're good.

    only kidding...lighter bars, seat, post, stem, pedals. do away with any bar ends if you don't need 'em. shedding 2 lbs isn't too extreme so it should be relatively painless. then there's the derailleurs if you really want to go crazy. definitely go with lighter tubes + tires if you're still a fraction heavier than you want to be.

    I'm not sure what the fork on that model weighs in at either. you might want to check it out before you get too swap-happy.

    bri

    --

    * enjoying the karma *
    remove LKJSDFJSD from address to email

  6. TonyP said:

    Thanks TBF for the link.

    I'll have a think about the wheels first and see how that goes.

    Cheers
    Tony

    just IMHO but I'd say not that cost effective....wait until they go bad
    or you need a new wheelset, then buy something a little lighter.

    bri

    --

    * enjoying the karma *
    remove LKJSDFJSD from address to email

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.