Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

TREK Fuel 100

Started by Speeder · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,283 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
16 June 2004
Last activity
18 June 2004
Original author
Speeder
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,283
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone has comment on this nike? I am new to this sport. Thanks.

  2. "Speeder" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone has comment on this nike? I am new to this sport. Thanks.

    If you are new to mountain biking, buy a hardtail and learn how to
    ride. Stay on the trail and ride, ride, ride. Low-end full
    suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

  3. The fuel was a good design 10 years ago. Now it's just old.

    "JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Speeder" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone has comment on this nike? I am new to this sport. Thanks.

    If you are new to mountain biking, buy a hardtail and learn how to
    ride. Stay on the trail and ride, ride, ride. Low-end full
    suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

  4. Quoted message said:

    Low-end full suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

    Sense when is a $4800 bike "Low End"?
    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/fuel100.jsp

  5. Chris said:
    Quoted message said:

    Low-end full suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

    Sense when is a $4800 bike "Low End"?
    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/fuel100.jsp

    The OP said that he was new to the sport. I'm not sure that someone new to
    the sport should bother/would be wise shelling out a lot of money for carbon
    components. Of course, if money is no object.... <shrug>
    --
    Westie
    (Replace 'invalid' with 'yahoo' when replying.)

  6. I Just got a Fuel 98 for Christmas {got to love the wife}.
    I really like the bike I have had a couple hardtail in the past .
    Some really good ones to .But the fuel is nice 2 of the racers in the area
    have fuel 100s .They have the pro pedal fox shock ,The bike handles well and
    does a good job of going up hill .But a lot of $$$ cash for a Person just
    getting into riding.I'm 44 and been riding for about 12 years The FS is
    great for extenened rides .I still take my HT Dean colonel Ti
    out for a shorted ride I still love the Ti over Alum,
    Buy what you can afford and ride it till it breaks .
    I broke a Trek Y22 twice in one summer.
    To many log crossing .
    Good luck .
    Ps Treks warranty is great ??

  7. On 2004-06-16, Speeder penned:

    Quoted message said:


    Does anyone has comment on this nike? I am new to this sport.
    Thanks.

    Pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do with Nike, either the god or
    the shoe. Also, please don't post in HTML.

    I was new to the sport last summer, and I got a Fuel 90. I thoroughly
    enjoyed it until someone backed over it last week. When it came to
    replacing the bike, I went with a different brand and model; partly, I
    wanted a more aggressive riding position, but partly, I just like to try
    new things.

    I don't know what your financial situation is, but one thing to consider
    is that your tastes may change as you improve. Starting out, you really
    don't know what you will want. If you have enough cash that you can buy
    a Fuel 100 and then buy something else in a year or two, more power to
    you. If you don't, you might want to consider getting something in a
    price range that will allow you that freedom.

    Either way, have you ridden other brands? I got stuck in a "must have
    Trek" mentality with my first bike, and I honestly don't know why. It's
    much more important to fit well on a bike than to have the brand you
    want. If it doesn't fit, move on.

    (If you do have that kind of cash, would you consider donating to my
    "Monique needs a Jamis" fund? J/K!)

    I had no problems with my Fuel 90. People will tell you about the
    dangers of bontrager cranks; they worked fine on my bike, but it's
    something to watch for. If you're experiencing a lot of chain suck,
    they may be the culprit.

    --
    monique

  8. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<Ez3Ac.102508$3x.22985@attbi_s54>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Low-end full suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

    Sense when is a $4800 bike "Low End"?
    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/fuel100.jsp

    Where did this one come from? Get this clyde, a high end bike starts
    at the FRAME. If you put XTR on a huffy, it's still a huffy. Put XTR
    on a trek and it's still a piece of [censored] trek. Thanks for playing.

    JD

  9. "Monique Y. Mudama" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    I had no problems with my Fuel 90. People will tell you about the
    dangers of bontrager cranks; they worked fine on my bike, but it's
    something to watch for. If you're experiencing a lot of chain suck,
    they may be the culprit.

    Went out last night with a group from the LBS. The owner has a new
    Fuel 90. It sucked 3 times and dropped once. The chain, Sorni, the
    chain. Damn thing is so new the welds are still warm. Well, not
    exactly, but you know what I mean. The trail is buff, so no
    dirt/dust. The chain is spotless. When it dropped on him as he was
    going around a switchback (not even pedalling - WTF?), he muttered
    "Bontrager [censored]", and I had to laugh. This guy is the biggest Trek
    fan there is west of Vo2lker.

    It may be that his FD isn't adjusted properly, or he tweaked the
    shifter coming around the corner, but falling down due to chain drop
    ain't gonna make Keith any friends.

    For you AMB-ID folks - getting pushed by better/more fit riders sure
    is nice. Better than sheparding n00bs around, even though that has
    it's own rewards, too. Like riding a particular section 3 or 4 times
    to show how to deal with a particular obstacle. Like hucking a big
    rock down by an alpine lake, or so I've heard...
    --
    Jonesy

  10. JD said:

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<Ez3Ac.102508$3x.22985@attbi_s54>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Low-end full suspension bikes like the trek fool are garbage.

    JD

    Sense when is a $4800 bike "Low End"?
    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/fuel100.jsp

    Where did this one come from? Get this clyde, a high end bike starts
    at the FRAME. If you put XTR on a huffy, it's still a huffy. Put XTR
    on a trek and it's still a piece of [censored] trek. Thanks for playing.

    JD

    Ok, I'm [censored]! Yesterday my kid scratced up my new
    "Lost Lonely Boys" CD and it started skipping. And now
    you!

    --
    - Zilla
    Cary, NC
    (Remove XSPAM)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.