I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the brake
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons) where
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older bike
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Trek brake cable design
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 19 September 2004
- Last activity
- 19 September 2004
- Original author
- Bill X
- Posts
- 7
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 422
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Meant to write "own an 87 Trek"... not 97
"Bill X" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the
brakeQuoted message said:
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons)
whereQuoted message said:
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older
bikeQuoted message said:
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence? -
In article <[email hidden]>,
Bill X said:
Meant to write "own an 87 Trek"... not 97
"Bill X" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the
brakeQuoted message said:
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons)
whereQuoted message said:
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older
bikeQuoted message said:
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence?Without attempting to answer the rhetorical questions directed at Trek,
I would direct your attention to the existence of plastic ferrules.
Those may solve your problem.But as long as the bike's paint holds up, this shouldn't be an issue.
--
Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
Verus de parvis; verus de magnis. -
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:31:54 -0400, "Bill X" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the brake
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons) where
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older bike
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence?I like the brake cable housing stops under the top tube of my 2300.
Sure, it saves a few grams of housing compared to full length housing,
but the part I like is that I can slip the housing out of the stops
(they're slotted) and lube the cable or pack the bike for shipping.
With that much slack I can avoid unfastening the rear brake cable to
package the bars.I've also noticed the metal ferrules getting stuck in the stops. I
just leave them off. When I'm feeling anal I file or grind the housing
ends flat. -
Perhaps this is done because nearly eveyone else does it this way, too.
Well, perhaps they put the cables on top rahter than under the tube,
but still...Put some grease on the the ferrules, or leave the off completely.
Bill X said:
I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the brake
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons) where
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older bike
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence? -
ibrunning-<< I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the brake
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons) where
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking >><BR><BR>Better brake action, less friction. A bit of maintenance and good ferrules,
greased lightly as they are installed would prevent any problems.Peter Chisholm
Vecchio's Bicicletteria
1833 Pearl St.
Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535
http://www.vecchios.com
"Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" -
Bill X said:
I bought a Trek 2300 road bike last year and had to take it in for
maintenance because the rear brake cable had totally corroded and the brake
housing was frozen to the aluminum frame. Trek designed the cable to run
under the top tube without housing so there are two points (braze ons) where
the metal ferrals of the housing come in direct contact with the aluminum
frame. What was Trek thinking when they made this design??? I own an 97
Aluminum Trek that's seen 10 times the miles and abuse and its original
brake cable is still intact. Only difference is brake housing on older bike
is continuous preventing metal contact with the frame. Is this a game of
shaving grams off a bike's weight or built in obsolecence?Grease, ideally anti-seize, is your friend. This is the best way to run
cable because top tubes are rather less compressible than an extra 2' of
cable housing. If the stops are designed for ferrules (some old ones
aren't), you should use them.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.