Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Trek 520 Gearing Change

Started by Bill · · Last activity · 7 posts · 2,091 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
12 September 2003
Last activity
17 September 2003
Original author
Bill
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,091
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB crankset
    FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or 118. I'd
    normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118.

    Any advice would be appreciated

    Thanks Bill

  2. Bill-<< I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB
    crankset FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or 118.
    I'd normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118. >><BR><BR>

    113, remember the BB is matched to the crank, not the frameset.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  3. A sgy person asked:

    Quoted message said:

    I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB crankset
    FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or 118. I'd
    normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118.

    Definitely get the 113. Shimano says 113 _or_ 118, but the 118 is for mountain bikes with
    oversized seat tubes, where the front derailer may not be able to move close enough in because of
    the fat tubing.

    The shorter BB will give much better chain line. Note that the 118 spindle for your 105 crank is a
    different spline pattern, and won't work with the LX crank.

    You would also probably be better off swapping front derailers for one designed for the smaller
    chainrings. This could cause indexing problems if your bike had STI, but since your bike uses
    barcons, that's a non-issue.

    Sheldon "Compatibilitude" Brown +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | We must sail sometimes with the wind and sometimes against it, | but we must sail, and not drift,
    | nor lie at anchor. | --Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  4. Thanks guys, I appreciate your help

    Bill

    "Sheldon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    A sgy person asked:

    Quoted message said:

    I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB
    crankset FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or
    118. I'd normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118.

    Definitely get the 113. Shimano says 113 _or_ 118, but the 118 is for mountain bikes with
    oversized seat tubes, where the front derailer may not be able to move close enough in because of
    the fat tubing.

    The shorter BB will give much better chain line. Note that the 118 spindle for your 105 crank is a
    different spline pattern, and won't work with the LX crank.

    You would also probably be better off swapping front derailers for one designed for the smaller
    chainrings. This could cause indexing problems if your bike had STI, but since your bike uses
    barcons, that's a


    non-issue.

    Quoted message said:


    Sheldon "Compatibilitude" Brown
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | We must sail sometimes with the wind and sometimes against it, | but we must sail, and not
    | drift, nor lie at anchor. | --Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  5. "Bill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB crankset
    FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or 118. I'd
    normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118.

    Wow, that is some step down from the 52/42/30 that comes on the current
    520. Out of curiosity, why the change?

    I took a 3,142 mile solo tour with a total bike/equipment weight of about 95 lbs (things like the
    gallon can of Coleman stove fuel are heavy ;-)). Even climbing some pretty significant mountains I
    never felt the need for gearing that low on the road... in the woods it's a different story.

    John

  6. This setup gives me approx 19 to 108 gear inches, pretty much what I'm lookin for. These 58 year old
    legs need all the help thay can get.

    I guess I'm not the only one who thinks this geaing is appropriate. Bruce Gordon Cycles uses this
    geaing and he is a well respected touring bike manufacturer.

    Bill

    "John Grossbohlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Bill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I want to change the Shimano 105 crankset on my Trek 520 (2003) to a Shimano Deore LX MTB
    crankset FC-M572 (22-32-44) Not sure which bottom bracket spindle length I should get - 113 or
    118. I'd normally get the 113 but the 105 bb was 118.

    Wow, that is some step down from the 52/42/30 that comes on the current
    520. Out of curiosity, why the change?

    I took a 3,142 mile solo tour with a total bike/equipment weight of about


    95

    Quoted message said:

    lbs (things like the gallon can of Coleman stove fuel are heavy ;-)). Even climbing some pretty
    significant mountains I never felt the need for


    gearing

    Quoted message said:

    that low on the road... in the woods it's a different story.

    John

  7. "Bill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This setup gives me approx 19 to 108 gear inches, pretty much what I'm lookin for. These 58 year
    old legs need all the help thay can get.

    I can appreciate that... I went to a full suspension mountain bike recently as my body couldn't take
    the pounding any more. The full suspension is keeping me on a bike as advancing age and back
    injuries suffered in an auto accident (I was rear-ended so hard the driver's seat broke off
    backwards) were doing their best to get me off.

    John

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.