Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Trails OPEN!

Started by CB · · Last activity · 8 posts · 443 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
4 May 2007
Last activity
5 May 2007
Original author
CB
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
443
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests
    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests

    For Immediate Release
    04-30-07
    Contact: Mark Eller, Communications Director
    [email hidden]
    303-545-9011

    The most extensive formal appeal in IMBA's 19-year history has
    culminated in an agreement that will maintain widespread bicycle
    access in four National Forest units in Southern California. With
    hundreds of trail miles at stake in the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres
    and San Bernardino forests, bike advocates embarked on a lengthy
    appeals process to a Forest Service decision to close dozens of trails
    to bikes.

    The decision was the culmination of five years of mountain biker
    participation in the Forest Service planning process. "Even when the
    documents and alternatives didn't favor us, the Forest Service staff
    welcomed our participation and encouraged us to keep working toward a
    solution," says IMBA Rep Jim Hasenauer, who began working on the issue
    in 2001 when the four forests first announced a joint planning process
    for trail management.

    According to IMBA California Policy Advisor Tom Ward, strong
    partnerships with state and federal agencies hold the key to bike
    access throughout the state. "IMBA's approach to mountain bike
    advocacy is to build strong relationships with land managers
    throughout California. We promote quality riding opportunities and
    work hard to create fun, environmentally sustainable trails that all
    users can enjoy," says Ward.
    IMBA Filed Extensive Appeal

    In 2004, after three years of preliminary work, the four Southern
    California forest units jointly released alternative plans for forest
    and trail management. IMBA's action alert generated hundreds of
    messages and letters urging that trails be kept open to bikes.
    "Although there was much that we liked in the original plan, we had
    concerns about some of the proposed Wilderness areas, the treatment of
    bicycles in 'critical biological zones,' and the ambiguity of language
    regarding bicycle use only on formally designated 'system' trails,"
    says Hasenauer.

    In 2005, the forests issued a revised plan that addressed most of
    IMBA's initial concerns. New Wilderness additions would have little
    effect on mountain bike opportunities, bikes would be allowed on
    trails in the "critical biological zones" unless specifically
    prohibited, and the Forests promised to deal with the "unofficial"
    trails issue with public participation, over time.

    In Oct. of 2006, the San Bernardino National Forest indicated its
    intention to close all "non-system trails" to bicycles. "We felt that
    was inconsistent with the 2005 plan," says Hasenauer. The Forest
    disagreed, but met with local bicyclists to inventory and keep some of
    those trails open. The local mountain biking community stepped up to
    help the Forest identify important trails for mountain bikes and the
    Forest agreed to delay the closure.

    At the same time, Hasenauer worked with fellow IMBA Rep Daniel
    Greenstadt, IMBA's Gary Sprung (then Senior Policy Adviser, now an
    independent contractor) and Washington-based policy advisor Kirk
    Bailey to develop an official appeal. "The appeal was the most
    extensive public participation document that IMBA has ever developed,"
    says Hasenauer. "Most appeals are quickly disqualified, but ours went
    forward."
    Meetings Lead to Withdrawal of Appeal

    In Nov. 2006, Hasenauer met with the Southern California Forest
    Supervisors and staff. "We agreed that the three other forests had a
    more reasonable approach and we're in fact, a more reasonable
    interpretation of the new plans," says Hasenauer. "We agreed that
    there would need to be a process and a Forest Order before trails were
    closed. Bicyclists could continue to ride such trails unless
    specifically prohibited. They also indicated that generally if non-
    classified trails were to be closed, they should be closed to all
    users." That understanding resulted in the December 2006 withdrawal of
    IMBA's appeal.

    "This is a great example of how steadfast advocacy inside public
    participation processes can save trails. IMBA is quite satisfied with
    the resolution and we look forward to working with the Forest Service
    on trail management issues again," says IMBA Government Affairs
    Director Jenn Dice.

  2. Ha ha ha!

    Suck that, Vandersh!t!

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

  3. CB said:

    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests
    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests

    For Immediate Release
    04-30-07
    Contact: Mark Eller, Communications Director
    [email hidden]
    303-545-9011

    The most extensive formal appeal in IMBA's 19-year history has
    culminated in an agreement that will maintain widespread bicycle
    access in four National Forest units in Southern California. With
    hundreds of trail miles at stake in the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres
    and San Bernardino forests, bike advocates embarked on a lengthy
    appeals process to a Forest Service decision to close dozens of trails
    to bikes.

    The decision was the culmination of five years of mountain biker
    participation in the Forest Service planning process. "Even when the
    documents and alternatives didn't favor us, the Forest Service staff
    welcomed our participation and encouraged us to keep working toward a
    solution," says IMBA Rep Jim Hasenauer, who began working on the issue
    in 2001 when the four forests first announced a joint planning process
    for trail management.

    According to IMBA California Policy Advisor Tom Ward, strong
    partnerships with state and federal agencies hold the key to bike
    access throughout the state. "IMBA's approach to mountain bike
    advocacy is to build strong relationships with land managers
    throughout California. We promote quality riding opportunities and
    work hard to create fun, environmentally sustainable trails that all
    users can enjoy," says Ward.
    IMBA Filed Extensive Appeal

    In 2004, after three years of preliminary work, the four Southern
    California forest units jointly released alternative plans for forest
    and trail management. IMBA's action alert generated hundreds of
    messages and letters urging that trails be kept open to bikes.
    "Although there was much that we liked in the original plan, we had
    concerns about some of the proposed Wilderness areas, the treatment of
    bicycles in 'critical biological zones,' and the ambiguity of language
    regarding bicycle use only on formally designated 'system' trails,"
    says Hasenauer.

    In 2005, the forests issued a revised plan that addressed most of
    IMBA's initial concerns. New Wilderness additions would have little
    effect on mountain bike opportunities, bikes would be allowed on
    trails in the "critical biological zones" unless specifically
    prohibited, and the Forests promised to deal with the "unofficial"
    trails issue with public participation, over time.

    That's nice but what about the 100s of miles of trails we lost to bogus
    Wilderness designations in the 90s?

    Greg

    --
    The ticketbastard Tax Tracker:
    http://www.ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html

    Dethink to survive - Mclusky


  4. Quoted message said:

    That's nice but what about the 100s of miles of trails we lost to bogus
    Wilderness designations in the 90s?

    Greg

    Yeah Greg.....

    That must be on the agenda somewhere, then maybe you and I will be
    riding Johnson Ridge <grin>

    CB

  5. CB said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's nice but what about the 100s of miles of trails we lost to bogus
    Wilderness designations in the 90s?

    Quoted message said:

    Greg

    Yeah Greg.....

    That must be on the agenda somewhere, then maybe you and I will be
    riding Johnson Ridge <grin>

    CB

    I'll never ride Johnson, but have ridden Pinos. Not that
    there'sanything wrong with that...

    JD

  6. CB said:

    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests
    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests

    For Immediate Release
    04-30-07
    Contact: Mark Eller, Communications Director
    [email hidden]
    303-545-9011

    The most extensive formal appeal in IMBA's 19-year history has
    culminated in an agreement that will maintain widespread bicycle
    access in four National Forest units in Southern California. With
    hundreds of trail miles at stake in the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres
    and San Bernardino forests, bike advocates embarked on a lengthy
    appeals process to a Forest Service decision to close dozens of trails
    to bikes.

    The decision was the culmination of five years of mountain biker
    participation in the Forest Service planning process. "Even when the
    documents and alternatives didn't favor us, the Forest Service staff
    welcomed our participation and encouraged us to keep working toward a
    solution," says IMBA Rep Jim Hasenauer,

    Professor of Rhetoric (the art of LYING).

    who began working on the issue

    Quoted message said:

    in 2001 when the four forests first announced a joint planning process
    for trail management.

    According to IMBA California Policy Advisor Tom Ward, strong
    partnerships with state and federal agencies hold the key to bike
    access throughout the state. "IMBA's approach to mountain bike
    advocacy is to build strong relationships with land managers
    throughout California. We promote quality riding opportunities and
    work hard to create fun, environmentally sustainable trails that all
    users can enjoy," says Ward.
    IMBA Filed Extensive Appeal

    In 2004, after three years of preliminary work, the four Southern
    California forest units jointly released alternative plans for forest
    and trail management. IMBA's action alert generated hundreds of
    messages and letters urging that trails be kept open to bikes.
    "Although there was much that we liked in the original plan, we had
    concerns about some of the proposed Wilderness areas, the treatment of
    bicycles in 'critical biological zones,' and the ambiguity of language
    regarding bicycle use only on formally designated 'system' trails,"
    says Hasenauer.

    In 2005, the forests issued a revised plan that addressed most of
    IMBA's initial concerns. New Wilderness additions would have little
    effect on mountain bike opportunities, bikes would be allowed on
    trails in the "critical biological zones" unless specifically
    prohibited, and the Forests promised to deal with the "unofficial"
    trails issue with public participation, over time.

    In Oct. of 2006, the San Bernardino National Forest indicated its
    intention to close all "non-system trails" to bicycles. "We felt that
    was inconsistent with the 2005 plan," says Hasenauer. The Forest
    disagreed, but met with local bicyclists to inventory and keep some of
    those trails open. The local mountain biking community stepped up to
    help the Forest identify important trails for mountain bikes and the
    Forest agreed to delay the closure.

    At the same time, Hasenauer worked with fellow IMBA Rep Daniel
    Greenstadt, IMBA's Gary Sprung (then Senior Policy Adviser, now an
    independent contractor) and Washington-based policy advisor Kirk
    Bailey to develop an official appeal. "The appeal was the most
    extensive public participation document that IMBA has ever developed,"
    says Hasenauer. "Most appeals are quickly disqualified, but ours went
    forward."
    Meetings Lead to Withdrawal of Appeal

    In Nov. 2006, Hasenauer met with the Southern California Forest
    Supervisors and staff. "We agreed that the three other forests had a
    more reasonable approach and we're in fact, a more reasonable
    interpretation of the new plans," says Hasenauer. "We agreed that
    there would need to be a process and a Forest Order before trails were
    closed. Bicyclists could continue to ride such trails unless
    specifically prohibited. They also indicated that generally if non-
    classified trails were to be closed, they should be closed to all
    users." That understanding resulted in the December 2006 withdrawal of
    IMBA's appeal.

    "This is a great example of how steadfast advocacy inside public
    participation processes can save trails. IMBA is quite satisfied with
    the resolution and we look forward to working with the Forest Service
    on trail management issues again," says IMBA Government Affairs
    Director Jenn Dice.


    --
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  7. On Fri, 04 May 2007 11:56:59 -0700, "G.T." <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    CB said:

    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests
    Mountain Bikers Retain Trail Access in Southern California Forests

    For Immediate Release
    04-30-07
    Contact: Mark Eller, Communications Director
    [email hidden]
    303-545-9011

    The most extensive formal appeal in IMBA's 19-year history has
    culminated in an agreement that will maintain widespread bicycle
    access in four National Forest units in Southern California. With
    hundreds of trail miles at stake in the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres
    and San Bernardino forests, bike advocates embarked on a lengthy
    appeals process to a Forest Service decision to close dozens of trails
    to bikes.

    The decision was the culmination of five years of mountain biker
    participation in the Forest Service planning process. "Even when the
    documents and alternatives didn't favor us, the Forest Service staff
    welcomed our participation and encouraged us to keep working toward a
    solution," says IMBA Rep Jim Hasenauer, who began working on the issue
    in 2001 when the four forests first announced a joint planning process
    for trail management.

    According to IMBA California Policy Advisor Tom Ward, strong
    partnerships with state and federal agencies hold the key to bike
    access throughout the state. "IMBA's approach to mountain bike
    advocacy is to build strong relationships with land managers
    throughout California. We promote quality riding opportunities and
    work hard to create fun, environmentally sustainable trails that all
    users can enjoy," says Ward.
    IMBA Filed Extensive Appeal

    In 2004, after three years of preliminary work, the four Southern
    California forest units jointly released alternative plans for forest
    and trail management. IMBA's action alert generated hundreds of
    messages and letters urging that trails be kept open to bikes.
    "Although there was much that we liked in the original plan, we had
    concerns about some of the proposed Wilderness areas, the treatment of
    bicycles in 'critical biological zones,' and the ambiguity of language
    regarding bicycle use only on formally designated 'system' trails,"
    says Hasenauer.

    In 2005, the forests issued a revised plan that addressed most of
    IMBA's initial concerns. New Wilderness additions would have little
    effect on mountain bike opportunities, bikes would be allowed on
    trails in the "critical biological zones" unless specifically
    prohibited, and the Forests promised to deal with the "unofficial"
    trails issue with public participation, over time.

    That's nice but what about the 100s of miles of trails we lost to bogus
    Wilderness designations in the 90s?

    Good point.

    Quoted message said:

    Greg


    --
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  8. JD said:
    CB said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's nice but what about the 100s of miles of trails we lost to bogus
    Wilderness designations in the 90s?
    Greg


    Yeah Greg.....

    That must be on the agenda somewhere, then maybe you and I will be
    riding Johnson Ridge <grin>

    CB

    I'll never ride Johnson, but have ridden Pinos. Not that
    there'sanything wrong with that...

    Now I get the johnson/pinos reference.

    Greg

    --
    The ticketbastard Tax Tracker:
    http://www.ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html

    Dethink to survive - Mclusky

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.