Traffic calming looks dangerous to me

Eatmorepies said:

They are traffic calming the A road than runs through my village. The red coating seems ok but at
one end they are putting a central reservation in to narrow the carriageway. There will not be
enough room for a cycle and a car in the narrowed part. Currently the road is plenty wide enough
for cars to pull out and pass quite safely. I recall that someone posted about the danger of this
system and how it has causes accidents - well, accidents have been caused by car drivers trying to
get past bikes.

Is this the case? Can anyone quote me any statistics before I have a chat with the engineers?

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

Beware of imitations, like channels the width of the gutter with really small bicycle symbols
painted in them.

Kit

Quoted message said:

Thanks

John

Kit Wolf said:

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

Beware of imitations, like channels the width of the gutter with really small bicycle symbols
painted in them.

Where the local imbeciles have put in anything like that round here, they've added give-way lines at
the end of the cycle bit. Now, they don't actuially slow down a cyclist, but you can bet that a
cager scumbag will get off scot-free for mowing down any cyclist in the vicinity of such
abominations.

Consequently, I ignore them, and go round the build-out, even if the bike bit is clear of glass,
rubbish, slippery covers and whatnot.

regards, Ian SMith
--
|\ /| no .sig
|o o|
|/ \|

Ian Smith <[email hidden]> wrote: ( > students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

The two cars in that picture are both L - two digits - three letters; how likely is that, then? (And
why hasn't c.j.l.wolf pixelated their number plates?)

) Where the local imbeciles have put in anything like that round here, ( they've added give-way
lines at the end of the cycle bit. Now, they ) don't actuially slow down a cyclist, but you can bet
that a cager ( scumbag will get off scot-free for mowing down any cyclist in the ) vicinity of such
abominations. ( ) Consequently, I ignore them, and go round the build-out, even if the ( bike bit
is clear of glass, rubbish, slippery covers and whatnot.

You forgot the car/skip/sofa parked in the road at the other end of the gutter masquerading as a
bicycle by-pass.

There is one somewhere round here (? Horspath, I forget...) which has one of those black-and-white
poles with red and white reflectors in the middle of the cycle lane at the far end of the island. It
appears to be inadvertent, but you can never tell.

"Geraint Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ian Smith <[email hidden]> wrote: ( > students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

The two cars in that picture are both L - two digits - three letters; how likely is that, then?
(And why hasn't c.j.l.wolf pixelated their number plates?)

Those drivers are AFAIK just going about their normal business, not involved in anything contentious
or illegal that would invite any form of reprisal against them - IMO I don't see any legal, security
or privacy need to hide the index numbers.

I'm sure I see loads of shots in local papers etc of streets with peoples number plates in full
view. The only time I usually see pixelated number plates is on crime programmes; and that is IIRC
only so well-meaning citizens don't inadvertantly waste police time if they should see the car used
in the reconstruction elsewhere on the local streets!

After all you would need access to PNC or DVLA computer to trace someone from the number
plates anyway?

Alex

Kit Wolf said:

... I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

At first glance this seems OK, but look more closely and you'll start to see the problems:

The cycle by-pass is still a little narrower than it should be. The desirable minimum width is
somewhere about 1.5 metres, giving enough room for most designs of tricycles and cycle trailers to
get through easily - but still narrow enough to discourage most cars. This one looks like it's
little more than a meter wide.

The cycle bypass doesn't appear to be signposted as such, with neither a round blue "Cycle route"
sign, nor a well-painted diagram 1057 on the road. (I don't see the shadow of any sign behind the
photographer.) The signing for other traffic doesn't seem right either, with the "Give Way" and the
black and white chevrons stuck up in the air like that. Where's the "Keep right" arrow? And the
"Traffic in other direction has priority" sign?

Look even closer at the red car: It's leaning slightly away from the camera as it swings back to the
left side of the road. But just how far left is it going to go? And is the two metre long white line
beyond the island, the one that's meant to mark the edge of a cycle lane, really going to do
anything to stop cyclists using the by-pass from being side-swiped as they emerge beyond it?

And what happens to cyclists going the other way? Are cars really going to stop and Give Way just
for a bicycle coming up the hill, or are they just going to squeeze through anyway?

The only design of road narrowing I've found that I really like is the gateway feature at the south
side of Newbridge. It's not designed so much to reduce speeds as to enforce an HGV ban through the
village, but I've never seen anyone driving through it quickly. And I've never once had a problem
here with cars trying to squeeze past me when I'm cycling through it - even though there's not a
single bit of "provision for bicycles" in the design!
miller_dd.tripod.comb7030 newbridge.htmOpen ↗

David D Miller Edinburgh

"Mr R@t \(2.3 zulu-alpha\) [comms room 2]" <[email hidden]> wrote: ( Those drivers are AFAIK
just going about their normal business, not involved ) in anything contentious or illegal that would
invite any form of reprisal ( against them - IMO I don't see any legal, security or privacy need to
hide ) the index numbers.

Yes. Sorry, I forgot that driving a car on the road was still legal. (It might be
contentious, though.)

"Kit Wolf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

These sort of "features" seem like bad news to me, as they seem like an open invitation for
motorists to hassle cyclists if they sensibly choose not to use them. They often tend to fill up
with [censored] like broken glass, leaves etc which are probably fine if you are riding an MTB, but not if
you are on a road bike with easily punctured tyres.

"Kit Wolf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

Beware of imitations, like channels the width of the gutter with really small bicycle symbols
painted in them.

And normally full of glass & [censored]. Forget it. Make the cagers wait.

There is a good design guide produced by the Scottish Executive, Cycling by Design, that covers
inter alia, traffic calming measures and their impact on cyclists. They give a number of
recommendations that you might be able to get your planners to adopt

The section on road narrowings is at scotland.gov.ukcbd 20.aspOpen ↗

There is also some very good stuff at
thebikezone.org.ukpinchpoints.htmlOpen ↗ which tells you how to go
about tackling the planners, recommendations and some good information links

Good luck

Tony

Eatmorepies said:

They are traffic calming the A road than runs through my village. The red coating seems ok but at
one end they are putting a central reservation in to narrow the carriageway. There will not be
enough room for a cycle and a car in the narrowed part. Currently the road is plenty wide enough
for cars to pull out and pass quite safely. I recall that someone posted about the danger of this
system and how it has causes accidents - well, accidents have been caused by car drivers trying to
get past bikes.

Is this the case? Can anyone quote me any statistics before I have a chat with the engineers?

Thanks

John

"Eatmorepies" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

They are traffic calming the A road than runs through my village. The red coating seems ok but at
one end they are putting a central reservation in to narrow the carriageway. There will not be
enough room for a cycle and a car in the narrowed part.

Many cyclists seem to be automatically in favour of traffic calming measures. Almost always,
however, the measures prove unpopular with local residents (mainly because they increase traffic
noise) and make cycling more dangerous rather than less. Pinch points can be particularly nasty.

Slowing the traffic may increase the safety of pedestrians crossing the road but I'm not sure how
you'd offset that against the increased risk to cyclists. It also seems to me that the drivers who
are actually slowed significantly by the measures seem to be those you wouldn't really worry about
in the first place. The more aggressive ones take the traffic calming as a technical challenge to be
negotiated without lifting the throttle.

--
Dave...

Tony Raven said:

There is a good design guide produced by the Scottish Executive, Cycling by Design, that covers
inter alia, traffic calming measures and their impact on cyclists. They give a number of
recommendations that you might be able to get your planners to adopt

Beat me to it. I was just going to post a link to the same excellent site.

Unfortunately, even up here in the frozen north, they don't actually implement those guidelines. My
local small town has recently installed a couple of traffic calming measures with no bypass for
cyclists that completely ignore the guidelines.

I feel a letter comming on.

Cheers,

Andy

Eatmorepies said:

They are traffic calming the A road than runs through my village. The red coating seems ok

<snip>

Having watched the spread of red paint through the nation's towns and villages over the last few
years I recently found myself thinking: "What would the British think if they saw people from, say,
Papua New Guinea daubing red paint on their roads in the belief it would protect them from car
accidents?" They'd probably snigger patronisingly.

Ian

--
Ian Walker Remove the yummy paste in my address to reply. Homepage: drianwalker.comdrianwalker.comOpen ↗

Ian Walker <[email hidden]> wrote: ( Having watched the spread of red paint through the
nation's towns and ) villages over the last few years I recently found myself thinking: "What (
would the British think if they saw people from, say, Papua New Guinea ) daubing red paint on their
roads in the belief it would protect them from ( car accidents?" They'd probably snigger
patronisingly.

A colleague who suffered twenty years' exile in the seventies and eighties in the Canadian Rockies
(my heart bleeds for him, as it did every time I forced myself to go to the conferences he organised
in the Spring...) said that he missed British "No Parking" signs when he came back -- surely you
remember: very round, very egg yolk yellow, and on black and yellow posts -- but that he could not
get used to all this fancy yellow urban road margin decoration that we had gone in for while he was
away. (That was before the red and green kryptonite.)

In message <[email hidden]>, Kit Wolf
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Adrian Boliston said:

"Kit Wolf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

These sort of "features" seem like bad news to me, as they seem like an open invitation for
motorists to hassle cyclists if they sensibly choose not to use them. They often tend to fill up
with [censored] like broken glass, leaves etc which are probably fine if you are riding an MTB, but not
if you are on a road bike with easily punctured tyres.

Agreed - but these ones are absolutely clear, and it looks as if they've been there for a while.

There's something similar near me but the cycle lanes are much narrower than shown in the picture
and they do get clogged up with rubbish. I guess the street cleaners might have a problem getting a
machine up them.
--
Michael MacClancy

Adrian Boliston said:

"Kit Wolf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Not offhand, but I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

These sort of "features" seem like bad news to me, as they seem like an open invitation for
motorists to hassle cyclists if they sensibly choose not to use them. They often tend to fill up
with [censored] like broken glass, leaves etc which are probably fine if you are riding an MTB, but not
if you are on a road bike with easily punctured tyres.

Agreed - but these ones are absolutely clear, and it looks as if they've been there for a while.

David D Miller said:

Kit Wolf said:

... I have a picture of a solution that seems OK to me...

students.ncl.ac.ukEPSN0152.JPGOpen ↗

At first glance this seems OK, but look more closely and you'll start to see the problems:

The cycle by-pass is still a little narrower than it should be. The desirable minimum width is
somewhere about 1.5 metres, giving enough room for most designs of tricycles and cycle trailers to
get through easily - but still narrow enough to discourage most cars. This one looks like it's
little more than a meter wide.

The cycle bypass doesn't appear to be signposted as such, with neither a round blue "Cycle route"
sign, nor a well-painted diagram 1057 on the road. (I don't see the shadow of any sign behind the
photographer.) The signing for other traffic doesn't seem right either, with the "Give Way" and
the black and white chevrons stuck up in the air like that. Where's the "Keep right" arrow? And
the "Traffic in other direction has priority" sign?

Look even closer at the red car: It's leaning slightly away from the camera as it swings back to
the left side of the road. But just how far left is it going to go? And is the two metre long
white line beyond the island, the one that's meant to mark the edge of a cycle lane, really going
to do anything to stop cyclists using the by-pass from being side-swiped as they emerge beyond it?

And what happens to cyclists going the other way? Are cars really going to stop and Give Way just
for a bicycle coming up the hill, or are they just going to squeeze through anyway?

The only design of road narrowing I've found that I really like is the gateway feature at the
south side of Newbridge. It's not designed so much to reduce speeds as to enforce an HGV ban
through the village, but I've never seen anyone driving through it quickly. And I've never once
had a problem here with cars trying to squeeze past me when I'm cycling through it - even though
there's not a single bit of "provision for bicycles" in the design!
miller_dd.tripod.comb7030 newbridge.htmOpen ↗

Could you repost the picture - I can't seem to download it.

Thanks,

Kit

<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Unfortunately, even up here in the frozen north, they don't actually implement those guidelines.
My local small town has recently installed a couple of traffic calming measures with no bypass for
cyclists that completely ignore the guidelines.

I just hope they don't start building these daft cycle bypasses where I live!

"Eatmorepies" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

They are traffic calming the A road than runs through my village. The red coating seems ok but at
one end they are putting a central reservation in to narrow the carriageway. There will not be
enough room for a cycle and a car in the narrowed part.

It is one lane, there is no passing space - stay slap bang in the middle of that lane: OK they can
still get you by ploughing into the back of you, but that will require a concious decision to do
murder....

"Rory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

It is one lane, there is no passing space - stay slap bang in the middle of that lane: OK they can
still get you by ploughing into the back of you, but that will require a concious decision to do
murder....

I've had a boy racer overtake me recently at a traffic island by him going *the wrong side* of the
traffic island!