General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Track work

Started by shinypenny · · Last activity · 31 posts · 650 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 October 2007
Last activity
19 October 2007
Original author
shinypenny
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
650
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–31 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. jen said:

    Your thoughts?

    My primary thought is that the desire to predict, and engage one's
    running buddies in predicting, one's 5k performance based on one's
    training is so deep and universal that it's actually become something
    of a running gag on another board I read. :-)

    I wouldn't hazard a guess. Too many variables coupled with a near-
    total lack of hard data to go on other than recent daily pace.

    But I will wish you luck and a good race. From having raced
    considerably faster than your daily training pace in the past, I'm
    guessing you have a pretty reasonable feel for the effort you can
    sustain. Trust that internal effort-meter assuming it's served you
    well in the past. And in the last mile, maybe start to trust it a
    little less; begin to suspect it's holding out on you and see if you
    can't prove it was a little overcautious. And use your arms - someone
    once said something like "run the last third of the race with your
    arms" and I find it true enough, your tired legs will tend to follow
    your insistently pumping arms.

  2. "Tony S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:TTRRi.2251$HU1.742@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:

    "Charlie Pendejo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Care to elaborate - what's good or bad for you?

    Specifically no, generally, refined foods, particularly refined
    carbohydrates, seem to produce an inflammatory state if eaten to
    excess. I've browsed many books on diet/health, though never follow
    any of the prescribed programs fully. Inflammation seems to have many
    causes in modern life. Refined foods and how the body handles them
    seems to be a common theme in many of those books, as is the theme
    that so-called healthy fats are very good for you, etc.

    Tony, you're going to help me with this position. I have been following
    nutrition for a lot of years and I have never heard of the relationship
    with inflammation and refined carbs. We all know that simple and most
    refined carbs are poor nutrition in general and for diabetics or those
    susceptible to high glycemic foods definitely a poor choice. OTOH I
    don't relate GI and insulin with inflammation but if you have a book or
    web page I'd like read about it.

    And we both know that the aid stations in a ultra are loaded with
    simple/unrefined carbs.

    Quoted message said:

    When I eat a diet balanced in protein/fats/carbs, of the right kinds,
    with refined carbs strictly limited to post-exercise periods, I tend
    to feel healthy and balanced and more supple.

    Is it really physical or just knowing proper eating and it makes you
    feel better mentally? 😉

    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, when I get busy sometimes and forget what I eat, I tend to be
    stiff, the joints often feel sore, and I don't recover as well from
    exercise; that is, my body gets into a sustained state of
    inflammation. What exact balance of foods will work for any one person
    is an experiment. Even then, as with many areas of life, knowing and
    doing are very different things, and experimenting takes time and
    discipline.

    Since we are all experiments of one and you find negative effects with
    improper balance, then do what works for you. I'm simply looking for a
    scientific connection plus I have never had the same experience. Maybe
    the Heineken really is my salvation, after all it is the first thing
    down the pipe after a race and training run. And you thought I was just
    nuts. 🙂

    -Doug

  3. "Kaz Kylheku" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    tfactor said:

    Speedwork is not consistent with your goal. The benefit of speedwork,
    assuming you're prepared for it, is speed, which is not what you're
    looking for.

    Aside from speed, the benefit of speedwork is that, perhaps depending
    on your personality, it adds a spark to your running, without which
    your training will head into blah territory.

    Speedwork improves your coordination and strength, which can act to
    reduce injuries throughout your training base.

    As long as the assumption above is true, "you are prepared." This means
    you have a sufficient base to withstand the rigors of speed. If you're
    not, it is a good way to get injured in a hurry. Very often the new
    runner is in a hurry to get faster and pushes the speed button way too
    fast. You will get naturally faster from getting a solid base and adding
    some gentle hills for strength. Speed is the last variable to play with.

    -Doug

  4. Doug Freese said:

    Tony, you're going to help me with this position. I have been following
    nutrition for a lot of years and I have never heard of the relationship
    with inflammation and refined carbs. We all know that simple and most
    refined carbs are poor nutrition in general and for diabetics or those
    susceptible to high glycemic foods definitely a poor choice. OTOH I
    don't relate GI and insulin with inflammation but if you have a book or
    web page I'd like read about it.

    Doug, just google "inflammation" and "omega-3" and you should get a
    lot of hits on this. I had a link awhile back that was particularly
    good.... I'll see if I can find it. Oprah has sort of popularized this
    whole concept, promoting Dr Oz, who wrote a book that goes into detail
    about this topic. But he's certainly not the only one harping about it
    today.

    The issue is that the body needs a balance of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty
    acids, the balance is debatable (i've seen 1:1 and 2:1 and 3:1), but
    most nutritional scientists today agree that our traditional american
    diet has skewed this ratio so that we get way too many omega-6's and
    not enough omega-3's. This is largely due to corn and wheat, which are
    subsidized by our government meaning we have such a surplus they are
    cheap to use for all sorts of processed and fast foods. Corn is in
    everything - in the form of high fructose corn syrup.

    When you get too many omega-6's and not enough omega-3's, inflammation
    processes start occurring in the body. This can result in high blood
    pressure and a bunch of other modern-day scourges. Omega-3's help
    reduce this inflammation. Sources of omega-3's include: flax seed,
    walnuts, olive oil, fatty fishes.

    jen

  5. Doug Freese said:

    As long as the assumption above is true, "you are prepared." This means
    you have a sufficient base to withstand the rigors of speed. If you're
    not, it is a good way to get injured in a hurry. Very often the new
    runner is in a hurry to get faster and pushes the speed button way too
    fast. You will get naturally faster from getting a solid base and adding
    some gentle hills for strength. Speed is the last variable to play with.

    I feel like I do have a good solid base though. I've been running for
    a whole year, and much of that has been on hills. Okay so it's only
    10-12 miles a week, but since i'm very slow, that equals out to a lot
    of time-on-feet. For example, this week it's working out to three runs
    of 45 minutes each.

    I know in the past I've gotten faster simply by running longer, but it
    seems that increasing my mileage may be causing the arthritis to
    flare. I could be wrong about that - it could just be a total
    coincidence instead of a pattern. But if I can't run longer, then that
    leaves trying to run faster, doesn't it?

    jen

  6. On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:08:51 -0400, "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Tony, you're going to help me with this position.

    The position I had in mind was bent over...
    -Doug

  7. "shinypenny" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks Tony. I eat a very clean diet, and have for a long time, since
    my 20s. Very little refined carbs and processed foods. I eat at least
    9 veggies/fruit per day, fats about 30% but 90% of that is omega 3's -
    fatty fishes 4-5xs per week, flax seed every day, walnuts 4-5x's a
    day, etc... I do everything mentioned in that link (including play!)
    except I don't take herbs and supplements.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm nearly vegetarian (but B12 isn't an issue either, because my
    doctor already tested me for that - he tested me for all the major
    vitamin deficiencies, the ones that can cause joint pain - and i came
    out "stellar" on every last one of them

    Just to be a contrarian, your diet is unusual in it's variety and
    composition -- is it possible that in your zeal to get lots of veggies that
    you may be sensitive to one or more of them? Plants have tons of antigens
    (or potentially allergy inducing chemicals, if that's the wrong word).

    In addition, allergies to flesh are very rare (similar to rice in this
    regard). If your diet is significantly different to the one we evolved
    with, that may be something to consider. Modern agricultural products are
    often quite different from their native forebears, too (consider durham
    wheat as opposed to more primitive, less allergy inducing varieties).

    -- Dan

  8. Kaz Kylheku said:
    tfactor said:

    Speedwork is not consistent with your goal. The benefit of speedwork,
    assuming you're prepared for it, is speed, which is not what you're
    looking for.

    Aside from speed, the benefit of speedwork is that, perhaps depending
    on your personality, it adds a spark to your running, without which
    your training will head into blah territory.

    Speedwork improves your coordination and strength, which can act to
    reduce injuries throughout your training base.

    Building on what your saying here. I notice something as a result of
    speedwork that ends up benefiting me in other sports - specifically
    basketball. My jumping really improves. I'll bet I gain 1-2 inches
    about 2-3 weeks after doing my first track workout each late winter.
    I'm guessing that I am building muscle that I lost during the winter.

  9. "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tony S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:TTRRi.2251$HU1.742@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:

    "Charlie Pendejo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Care to elaborate - what's good or bad for you?

    Specifically no, generally, refined foods, particularly refined
    carbohydrates, seem to produce an inflammatory state if eaten to excess.
    I've browsed many books on diet/health, though never follow any of the
    prescribed programs fully. Inflammation seems to have many causes in
    modern life. Refined foods and how the body handles them seems to be a
    common theme in many of those books, as is the theme that so-called
    healthy fats are very good for you, etc.

    Tony, you're going to help me with this position. I have been following
    nutrition for a lot of years and I have never heard of the relationship
    with inflammation and refined carbs. We all know that simple and most
    refined carbs are poor nutrition in general and for diabetics or those
    susceptible to high glycemic foods definitely a poor choice. OTOH I don't
    relate GI and insulin with inflammation but if you have a book or web page
    I'd like read about it.

    If it were only that simple. I'm sure you'd agree that biology is one of the
    most complex topics mankind has ever studied. Patterns with multiple causes
    are very hard to prove. Comparisons between countries and dietary tendencies
    between countries may be the most useful in some ways, though population
    specific genetics and other causes for diseases and condtions besides diet
    must be taken into account. Even this comparison technique is changing now
    as western-style diets are available worldwide.

    Even inflammation as a condition and possible precursor to many diseases is
    a fairly new concept, but it's this kind of wholistic view that, in my view,
    has the most potential to figure out why affluent societies have much higher
    percentages of certain types of diseases, for example. As I'm sure you know,
    it's the wholistic view of health that is missing in most doctor's offices,
    and in the modern medical system.

    Quoted message said:

    And we both know that the aid stations in a ultra are loaded with
    simple/unrefined carbs.

    Yes, and that's fine with me. During and after exercise is when the body can
    suck them right up and put them to best use. You want fast absorption at
    such times.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I eat a diet balanced in protein/fats/carbs, of the right kinds,
    with refined carbs strictly limited to post-exercise periods, I tend to
    feel healthy and balanced and more supple.

    Is it really physical or just knowing proper eating and it makes you feel
    better mentally? 😉

    Yes, and yes. I can notice a physical difference, and I also feel better
    about it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, when I get busy sometimes and forget what I eat, I tend to be
    stiff, the joints often feel sore, and I don't recover as well from
    exercise; that is, my body gets into a sustained state of inflammation.
    What exact balance of foods will work for any one person is an
    experiment. Even then, as with many areas of life, knowing and doing are
    very different things, and experimenting takes time and discipline.

    Since we are all experiments of one and you find negative effects with
    improper balance, then do what works for you. I'm simply looking for a
    scientific connection plus I have never had the same experience. Maybe
    the Heineken really is my salvation, after all it is the first thing down
    the pipe after a race and training run. And you thought I was just nuts.
    🙂

    -Doug

    Experiments of one, I agree. As far as the science goes, as you know,
    nutrition science is all over the place. OTOH, there seems to be broad
    general agreement that refined foods aren't natural to the human diet, and
    that high-glycemic foods can lead to yo-yos in blood sugar levels and
    problems. The extent of the latter is under debate. That it can be a
    contributing cause of eventual obesity, pre-diabetic syndrome and perhaps
    even type II diabetes is also under debate.

    Inflammation is also a buzz word that means different things in different
    contexts, and, like the other conditions just mentioned, has many causes.
    But, in my reading of these matters, and in my personal experience, the
    refined and high glycemic foods can cause direct symptoms that I experience
    whenever I 'forget' to eat right.

    A few of the books I've browsed on the topic -- not to include Atkins books
    I read years ago, which were followed by south-beach and others, moving from
    low-carb to right-carb thinking, most of which I think also pointed to
    inflammation as an outcome of eating the wrong foods, which include
    refined/high glycemic foods -- are (and they of course don't agree entirely
    and have different points of view on some matters):

    The Anti-Inflammation Zone, Dr. Barry Sears
    Stop Inflammation Now, Richard M. Flemming, M.D.
    Inflammation Nation, Floyd H. Chilton, Ph.D.

    -Tony

  10. Charlie Pendejo said:
    jen said:

    Your thoughts?

    My primary thought is that the desire to predict, and engage one's
    running buddies in predicting, one's 5k performance based on one's
    training is so deep and universal that it's actually become something
    of a running gag on another board I read. :-)

    I wouldn't hazard a guess. Too many variables coupled with a near-
    total lack of hard data to go on other than recent daily pace.

    But I will wish you luck and a good race. From having raced
    considerably faster than your daily training pace in the past, I'm
    guessing you have a pretty reasonable feel for the effort you can
    sustain. Trust that internal effort-meter assuming it's served you
    well in the past. And in the last mile, maybe start to trust it a
    little less; begin to suspect it's holding out on you and see if you
    can't prove it was a little overcautious. And use your arms - someone
    once said something like "run the last third of the race with your
    arms" and I find it true enough, your tired legs will tend to follow
    your insistently pumping arms.

    Ooh... the arm tip is a good one. I'd forgotten about the arms!

    Right now I can't even imagine running at the effort I ran those past
    two 5k's. Part of that is that I suspect I've lost some strength in my
    legs lately. But, the truth is, I don't particularly like to run 5k's.
    It's not really my definition of fun. Even if I tell myself I'm just
    going to run easy, I always end up pushing it to near-puking level.

    But, I do want to test myself on this anniversary, and the 5K is in my
    neighborhood so I'd feel like a total slackard if I didn't run it.

    Actually, this will end up being my speedwork, I suppose!

    jen

  11. "Tony S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:fc5Si.98$na2.51@trndny08...

    Quoted message said:

    Even inflammation as a condition and possible precursor to many
    diseases is a fairly new concept, but it's this kind of wholistic view
    that, in my view, has the most potential to figure out why affluent
    societies have much higher percentages of certain types of diseases,
    for example. As I'm sure you know, it's the wholistic view of health
    that is missing in most doctor's offices, and in the modern medical
    system.

    I'm not holstic or wholistic but I am a pragmatist and the science is
    just not there, at least yet.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I eat a diet balanced in protein/fats/carbs, of the right
    kinds, with refined carbs strictly limited to post-exercise periods,
    I tend to feel healthy and balanced and more supple.

    Is it really physical or just knowing proper eating and it makes you
    feel better mentally? 😉

    Yes, and yes. I can notice a physical difference, and I also feel
    better about it.

    Ok.

    Quoted message said:

    Experiments of one, I agree. As far as the science goes, as you know,
    nutrition science is all over the place. OTOH, there seems to be broad
    general agreement that refined foods aren't natural to the human diet,

    I agree to a point.

    Quoted message said:

    and that high-glycemic foods can lead to yo-yos in blood sugar levels
    and problems. The extent of the latter is under debate.

    Atkins and a little of Sears took great liberties, without real science,
    to claim we all ultra sensitive GI machines. When tests were not run by
    Atkins and the low other low carb folks, It did not pan out. The numbers
    were in fact not there. On a sliding scale simple carbs(candy, etc) are
    worst and usless(unless in an ultra where they are instantly need and
    absorbed), refined are not bad but better than simple and but worse than
    complex.

    Quoted message said:

    That it can be a contributing cause of eventual obesity, pre-diabetic
    syndrome and perhaps even type II diabetes is also under debate.

    Obesity and Type II are from too much weight. Most of weight comes from
    disproportionate eating, too much fat and simple carbs and too little
    exercise.

    Quoted message said:

    Inflammation is also a buzz word that means different things in
    different contexts, and, like the other conditions just mentioned, has
    many causes. But, in my reading of these matters, and in my personal
    experience, the refined and high glycemic foods can cause direct
    symptoms that I experience whenever I 'forget' to eat right.

    The you are one of those that are sensitive to high GI foods.

    Quoted message said:


    A few of the books I've browsed on the topic -- not to include Atkins
    books I read years ago, which were followed by south-beach and others,
    moving from low-carb to right-carb thinking, most of which I think
    also pointed to inflammation as an outcome of eating the wrong foods,
    which include refined/high glycemic foods -- are (and they of course
    don't agree entirely and have different points of view on some
    matters):

    To most nutritionists right-carbs are complex not refined. I think the
    leading edge nutritionists feel the Harvard folks(much like Consumer
    Reports and have allegience to no one) are on the money. The government
    pyramid is politically driven by lobbyists not health. Take a look at
    http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/pyramids.html specifically
    the pyramid. Exercise is at the bottom along with fats(Omega 3 as Jen
    was covering), whole grains and fruits, etc.

    From Flemming..

    " The author, a nuclear cardiologist and founder of the Fleming Heart
    and Health Institute in Omaha, Neb., builds on his earlier work (How to
    Bypass Your Bypass: What Your Doctor Doesn't Tell You About Cholesterol
    and Your Diet) to identify in this reader-friendly guide 12 risk factors
    for heart disease. According to Fleming, these factors-which include
    high blood cholesterol level (over 150), excess weight, elevated
    homocysteine (resulting from eating too much animal protein) and
    oxidants in the blood stream-trigger an inflammatory reaction that
    causes heart disease and may also be responsible for diabetes, arthritis
    and other serious conditions. Dismissing bypass surgery and angioplasty
    as short-term solutions, Fleming claims that his suggested diet,
    combined with regular exercise such as daily walking, will reverse heart
    disease without medication or surgery."

    He talks about an inflammatory reaction without any definition. I'm
    still not sure what he claims is infammed. I think we asre in agreement
    with proper eating, It's just the use or abuse of the term inflammation
    that bothers me.

    -doug

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.