Quoted message said:This came up on the IAM forum a few weeks ago and a (former?) serving police officer stated that
this was rubbish provided a) the blade was less than 3 (2?) inches and b) it wasn't a flick knife
and c) you didn't carry it with the intent to use it to do harm.
You can carry a folding knife less than 3" long. Anything else you need to have a 'reasonable
excuse' for, unless it's one of the knives that are specifically forbidden (such as flick knives).
Because the lock knife can be locked it's deemed not to be folding so you need a reasonable excuse
to carry one, no matter how long or short it is.
Ultimately it's up to the courts to determine what a reasonable excuse is - but it doesn't sound
very likely that a court would that a person on a bike carrying a knife that's an integral part of a
bike toolkit is being unreasonable... Unless you've found a stated case to the contrary, of course!
Quoted message said:However, c) is an important one. If, when the police ask why you are carrying a knife you say "for
self defence" then that, in and of itself, is sufficient to establish that you are carrying it
"with intent".
Well, it negates the reasonable excuse. You are simply not allowed to carry offensive weapons in
this country for self-defence. I suppose the reason is that it implies you have thought about the
possibility of harming someone beforehand, rather than reacting to save yourself spontaneously by
using whatever came to hand, which is all the law allows.
David