Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Too Good to be True?

Started by Tom S · · Last activity · 12 posts · 732 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 July 2003
Last activity
27 July 2003
Original author
Tom S
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
732
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a "caveat emptor" question. I have the opportunity to buy a '03 Trek 2300 full Ultegra triple
    with Eggbeaters for $1000. Unfortunately, it has about 70 (yep, all of seventy) miles on it. Except
    for the pedals, it is totally stock.

    The frame is a 54 and I'm between a 54 and a 56 sizewise. I can go with a slightly tight fit and get
    a little extension in the headset. The 56 Trek gives me a "loose" fit. The 54 doesn't feel bad the
    way it is now.

    Can anyone think of any reason I shouldn't jump on this bike?

    Thanks to all.

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the town where I can buy the bike has a vowel in it!) ;-)

    --
    Tom S

  2. Make sure the frame didn't get cracked when the bike "fell off the truck".

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the seller of the bike has a rap sheet!) ;-)

    "Tom S" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a "caveat emptor" question. I have the opportunity to buy a '03


    Trek

    Quoted message said:

    2300 full Ultegra triple with Eggbeaters for $1000. Unfortunately, it has about 70 (yep, all of
    seventy) miles on it. Except for the pedals, it is totally stock.

    The frame is a 54 and I'm between a 54 and a 56 sizewise. I can go with a slightly tight fit and
    get a little extension in the headset. The 56 Trek gives me a "loose" fit. The 54 doesn't feel bad
    the way it is now.

    Can anyone think of any reason I shouldn't jump on this bike?

    Thanks to all.

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the town where I can buy the bike has a vowel in it!) ;-)

    --
    Tom S

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/2003

  3. Quoted message said:

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the town where I can buy the bike has a vowel in it!) ;-)

    Well, then, it's not in Wales or the Czech Republic... :-)

    Joe

  4. The bike is actually in my LBS which is selling it for the original buyer (long,
    interesting...possibly true story). I guess I will have to check and see if the LBS would give some
    sort of warranty. If they aren't comfortable with a warranty, I'll probably turn it down.

    Tom S

    --
    Tom S "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Make sure the frame didn't get cracked when the bike "fell off the truck".

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the seller of the bike has a rap sheet!) ;-)

    "Tom S" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a "caveat emptor" question. I have the opportunity to buy a '03


    Trek

    Quoted message said:

    2300 full Ultegra triple with Eggbeaters for $1000. Unfortunately, it


    has

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    about 70 (yep, all of seventy) miles on it. Except for the pedals, it is totally stock.

    The frame is a 54 and I'm between a 54 and a 56 sizewise. I can go with


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    slightly tight fit and get a little extension in the headset. The 56


    Trek

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    gives me a "loose" fit. The 54 doesn't feel bad the way it is now.

    Can anyone think of any reason I shouldn't jump on this bike?

    Thanks to all.

    (BTW, in case you're interested, the town where I can buy the bike has a vowel in it!) ;-)

    --
    Tom S

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14/07/2003

  5. In article <[email hidden]>, Tom S

    Quoted message said:

    I have a "caveat emptor" question. I have the opportunity to buy a '03 Trek 2300 full Ultegra
    triple with Eggbeaters for $1000. Unfortunately, it has about 70 (yep, all of seventy) miles on it.
    Except for the pedals, it is totally stock.

    The frame is a 54 and I'm between a 54 and a 56 sizewise. I can go with a slightly tight fit and
    get a little extension in the headset. The 56 Trek gives me a "loose" fit. The 54 doesn't feel bad
    the way it is now.

    How is the top tube length?

    I don't know Treks but the general trend is for longer top tubes, which means that you can ride a
    smaller frame and still have a reasonable reach to the bars without needing a 14cm stem. If the top
    tube is long enough for a good reach for you, go with the smaller frame.

    Eric

  6. Eric: Thanks for your comment. The more I think about it, the better the bike looks. Looks like I
    may take a little longer demo tomorrow. Tom Scanlin

    --
    Tom S "Eric Murray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Tom S

    Quoted message said:

    I have a "caveat emptor" question. I have the opportunity to buy a '03


    Trek

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    2300 full Ultegra triple with Eggbeaters for $1000. Unfortunately, it has about 70 (yep, all of
    seventy) miles on it. Except for the pedals, it is totally stock.

    The frame is a 54 and I'm between a 54 and a 56 sizewise. I can go with a slightly tight fit and
    get a little extension in the headset. The 56 Trek gives me a "loose" fit. The 54 doesn't feel
    bad the way it is now.

    How is the top tube length?

    I don't know Treks but the general trend is for longer top tubes, which means that you can ride a
    smaller frame and still have a reasonable reach to the bars without needing a 14cm stem. If the
    top tube is long enough for a good reach for you, go with the smaller frame.

    Eric

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Tom S
    The bike is actually in my LBS which is selling it for the original buyer (long,
    interesting...possibly true story). I guess I will have to check and see if the LBS would give some
    sort of warranty. If they aren't comfortable with a warranty, I'll probably turn it down.

    I believe trek has a lifetime warranty on the fram and a 1 year component warranty.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, usenet- [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom S said:

    The bike is actually in my LBS which is selling it for the original buyer (long,
    interesting...possibly true story). I guess I will have to check and see if the LBS would give
    some sort of warranty. If they aren't comfortable with a warranty, I'll probably turn it down.

    I believe trek has a lifetime warranty on the fram and a 1 year component warranty.

    --

    Quoted message said:

    --------------------------<


    Posted via cyclingforums.com cyclingforums.comcyclingforums.com

    And I quote from a Trek owner's manual: "This warranty applies only to the original owner and is
    non-transferable."

  9. Mark Scardiglia said:
    Quoted message said:


    I believe trek has a lifetime warranty on the fram and a 1 year component warranty.

    And I quote from a Trek owner's manual: "This warranty applies only to the original owner and is
    non-transferable."

    I work at a Trek dealer. I don't ever recall asking an owner for a receipt, nor have I seen Trek
    denying a warranty claim based on this clause. This includes expensive OCLV road frames.

    I'm not saying they won't ever or haven't ever done this, but I haven't seen it enforced.

    Some of this may have to do with an individual dealer's relationship with a vendor. I've seen some
    shops treated much better than others, based on stuff like payment history. Shops that owe vendors
    money often don't get as good service from the manufacturer's reps.

    Barry

  10. bigfloppyllama <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    I believe trek has a lifetime warranty on the fram and a 1 year component warranty.

    Does this apply to subsequent purchasers?

    Companies I know with lifetime warranties (Dawes and Claude Butler) only warranty the frame for the
    original purchaser.

    In the cases quoted I'm not sure what the warranty is worth now, sadly, neither marques are
    independent concerns.

    Andrew Webster

  11. "Tom S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The bike is actually in my LBS which is selling it for the original buyer (long,
    interesting...possibly true story). I guess I will have to check


    and

    Quoted message said:

    see if the LBS would give some sort of warranty. If they aren't


    comfortable

    Quoted message said:

    with a warranty, I'll probably turn it down.

    Tom S

    --

    If I trusted the LBS & I trust most of the ones round here. There is NO WAY they would sell
    secondhand a bike they knew to be dodgy. Their reputation is far too important for that. So If you
    trust them I would slap the money down and run/ride away cackling loudly!

    Stan Cox

  12. Tom S said:

    Can anyone think of any reason I shouldn't jump on this bike?

    I have a pair of very expensive shoes in the closet that will last the rest of my life. They were a
    great deal but a tad snug.

    A bicycle is no bargain unless the fit is as close to optimum as possible.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.