Hi Phil:
Phil Holman wrote:
SNIP
I used to think "at least it's a crude metric that some people COULD
use," but then I realized his charter for the two pound diet was Exodus
16:16 because 16 ounces plus 16 ounces equals two pounds (although most
other amatuer bible scholars I've consulted say the "omer" was a unit
of volume) and his large-scale peer-reviewed population study was the
Israelites wandering in the desert. And, to be frank, for folks with
impaired glucose tolerance, matzo could be a bad idea (for further
details, consult your neighborhood Registered Dietician, the local
Certified Diabetes Educator or a good Endocrinologist, good luck
getting an HMO to pay for that, though). Teaching people how to eyeball
portions and the interaction and varied action of macronutrients and,
oh, so many other things that may have been left by the wayside when
the food pyramid went condo would be a better way to go about it --
especially for those who eat out....
There are other ways to go about food intake reduction besides the
overly simplistic, condescending "two pound-OMER Way Of Eating" or
however Chung's styling it this month.
Oh, by the way, if the CDE or Endo are worth their fees, they'll be
pretty upfront about mentioning exercise. Spring is here -- time to get
in some nice rides. Hey, some ON TOPIC content!
Quoted message said:The 2lb diet attempts to encourage people to eat less. I wouldn't
exactly call it madness for sedentary folk.
Phil H
Robert Leone