Today's dead cyclist

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:39:22 GMT, Steve <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

is worth 4 years, out in about 1 I've no doubt.

http://www.hemeltoday.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=2138063&SectionID=841

Just what is the point of having a 14 max sentence when it is never
applied? You could drink 3 bottles of vodka, blindfold yourself and drive
through a school playground at breaktime and you will be out in less than 5
years.

Steve

I'd be asking to have that aircraft engine inspected again, I would.

Steve said:

is worth 4 years, out in about 1 I've no doubt.

http://www.hemeltoday.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=2138063&SectionID=841

Yet you get 8 years for kidnapping.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6495989.stm

Martin Dann said:

Steve said:

is worth 4 years, out in about 1 I've no doubt.

http://www.hemeltoday.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=2138063&SectionID=841

Yet you get 8 years for kidnapping.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6495989.stm

Yes, but you don't usually kidnap someone by accident.

Although 'accident' seems a bit of a stretch after drinking that much.

Whilst the event, or one like it, was not deliberate, it should certainly have
been expected.

Quoted message said:

Just what is the point of having a 14 max sentence when it is never
applied? You could drink 3 bottles of vodka, blindfold yourself and drive
through a school playground at breaktime and you will be out in less than 5
years.

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

Duncan Smith said:

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

--
Dave...

dkahn400 said:

Duncan Smith said:

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

Now that's a sinister thought...

"Marc Brett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

dkahn400 said:

Duncan Smith said:

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

Now that's a sinister thought...

No, it's just a load of left-wing nonsense

in message <[email hidden]>, Marc Brett

(') said:

On 26 Mar 2007 09:15:47 -0700, "dkahn400" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Duncan Smith said:

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

Now that's a sinister thought...

Oh, don't be so gauche.

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

... a mild, inoffensive sadist...

Marc Brett wrote on 26/03/2007 18:10 +0100:

Quoted message said:

dkahn400 said:

Duncan Smith said:

FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

Now that's a sinister thought...

Not very dexterous then?

--
Tony

"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
is no good evidence either way."
- Bertrand Russell

wafflycat said:

"Marc Brett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On 26 Mar 2007 09:15:47 -0700, "dkahn400" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On Mar 26, 4:47 pm, "Duncan Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote:

> FFS, I reckon someone should probably get a second opinion on the
> aircraft he was inspecting too!

It must have been the port engine.

Now that's a sinister thought...

No, it's just a load of left-wing nonsense

What's all the flap about? Pilot studies indicate this is true.