Mike Sales said:Quoted message said:It's a little steel dual-shocker. First shock was how bad the brakes were,
second shock was to find a sticker to see it was sold be a reputable LSB.
Quoted message said:The brakes will never be wonderful, as it has Plastic V-brake arms!
If a bike shop doesn't sell these kids bikes it won't sell very many kids
bikes.
Shops can only sell what their customers buy.
I agree. What are the alternatives?
1. A simple frame with maybe 7 gears at most. For the same money,
you'd get a much better bike which would be useful for going
somewhere. However, to most children this would look pathetic when
others have full susp. 21 gear BSOs. Can you imagine the kid with the
simple bike winning the argument about who has got the best bike? This
stuff matters to kids, and it would require a very confident,
knowledgeable child to be happy with the technically superior simple
bike. I'm sure it happens in cycling families, but why on earth would
you expect the non-cycling parent to buy anything other than the £50
special the child asks for.
2. Parents spend enough to buy their offspring proper full susp.
bikes, which will be the right size for them for maybe a few years.
It's just not going to happen.
These BSOs are mostly used for riding up and down the street, and they
are good enough for that (although I do find the dodgy brakes a little
scary - trading standards should do something about that).
Maybe these rubbish bikes might make children think that cycling is
hard, and stop them progressing to proper cycling, but I am doubtful
about that. They can't be any worse to ride than the no gear
heavyweight that I started on, on which I went off on 20 mile day
"tours" while still at primary school.
Customers want to buy these things, so why shouldn't bike shops sell
them? If they have them in the window, they stand a chance of getting
people in through the door and talking to them about the advantages of
better bikes.
Rob