Toasted vs untoasted muesli

"Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat

due

Quoted message said:

to oil being used, but not all of them.

I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for digestion
etc.

What's the opinion on muesli in general?

There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful about the
total amount of calories as most muesli is high in calories. If you're
worried about total calories you might try oatmeal.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat
due to oil being used, but not all of them.

I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for digestion
etc.

What's the opinion on muesli in general?

Should be avoided at any cost, especially if you have weight control
problems.

Mirek

"Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat

due

Quoted message said:

to oil being used, but not all of them.

I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for digestion
etc.

What's the opinion on muesli in general?

There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful about the
total amount of calories as most muesli is high in calories. If you're
worried about total calories you might try oatmeal.

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

Darkfalz said:

"Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat

due

Quoted message said:

to oil being used, but not all of them.

I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for digestion
etc.

What's the opinion on muesli in general?

There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful about the
total amount of calories as most muesli is high in calories. If you're
worried about total calories you might try oatmeal.

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

That's what my Canadian husband calls it - porridge. Must be a
cultural thing.

Em

Be careful what you wish for....

"Auntie Em" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Darkfalz said:

"Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat
due
> to oil being used, but not all of them.
>
> I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for
> digestion
> etc.
>
> What's the opinion on muesli in general?

There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful about the
total amount of calories as most muesli is high in calories. If you're
worried about total calories you might try oatmeal.

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

That's what my Canadian husband calls it - porridge. Must be a
cultural thing.

Just another case of Americans changing words to be different.

Quoted message said:

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

Oatmeal is flatten oat grains. "Old-fashioned" oatmeal the flattening is
all that has been done. And then there is a quick form
which has been somewhat precooked and then
dried. In the health food store, one can also buy
cut oats. To my mind none of this stuff looks like
meal......a coursely ground grain. Porridge is
a good word. It just less specific as porridge
can contain barley, oats, wheat, triticale (ms?), millet, and
rye.

In sci.med.nutrition Darkfalz <[email hidden]> wrote or quoted:

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other?

Eating burnt food is probably not terribly good for your health.

Reasons include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polycyclic
aromatic amines and advanced glycation endproducts.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ [email hidden] Remove lock to reply.

"Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more fat due
to oil being used, but not all of them.

I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for digestion
etc.

What's the opinion on muesli in general?

Toasted will have more advanced glycosylation endproducts (AGEs) than
non-toasted, and hence, will tend to age on more quickly....

Darkfalz <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Auntie Em" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Darkfalz said:

"Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have more

fat

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> due
>> to oil being used, but not all of them.
>>
>> I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for
>> digestion
>> etc.
>>
>> What's the opinion on muesli in general?
>
> There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful about

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> total amount of calories as most muesli is high in calories. If

you're

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> worried about total calories you might try oatmeal.

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

That's what my Canadian husband calls it - porridge. Must be a
cultural thing.

Just another case of Americans changing words to be different.

In the US porridge is just a generic term for some cereal grain or meal
boiled in water or milk. The grain could be (among others) oats, semolina,
wheat, peasemeal, barley, or cornmeal. Oatmeal is a porridge of oats and
they preferably aren't quick-cooking. Grits (cornmeal) and Cream of Wheat
are other popular porridges served for breakfast in the US.

Darkfalz said:

"Auntie Em" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Darkfalz said:

"Beverly" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "Darkfalz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> Is one healthier than the other? I know that some toasted have
>> more fat due to oil being used, but not all of them.
>>
>> I prefer toasted, but I'll eat the ordinary if it's better for
>> digestion
>> etc.
>>
>> What's the opinion on muesli in general?
>
> There is nothing wrong with muesli. You do need to be careful
> about the total amount of calories as most muesli is high in
> calories. If you're worried about total calories you might try
> oatmeal.

Is oatmeal just quick cooking oats (porridge)?

That's what my Canadian husband calls it - porridge. Must be a
cultural thing.

Just another case of Americans changing words to be different.

Oatmeal has been in the English language since 1420. Porridge has been in
the English language since 1532. I don't understand how you figure the
Americans changed it, considering that the word porridge did not exist when
oatmeal entered the English language, and America had not yet been
discovered by English speakers. Please explain.

" the establishment
shields these writers from potentially devastating critiques. The
reason being that the Kennedys were never part of that
establishment. No one protected JFK in Dallas. No one protected
RFK in Los Angeles. The ensuing investigations did everything
they could to protect the true murderers; to hell with the
victims. And since the Church Committee showed in public that the
Kennedys were not business as usual, there has been an intense
and incessant effort to reverse that verdict; in essence to
rewrite history. People like Slatzer, Davis, and now Hersh have
made their living off of it.

The Kennedys themselves deserve part of the blame. In Samuels'
article in The New Yorker, Kennedy family lawyer Myer Feldman
says that he advised the Kennedys not to even comment on Hersh,
let alone sue (p. 69). If I were advising, I would have urged a
lawsuit as far back as 1984 with both the Collier-Horowitz book
and the Davis book. I would have loved to hear how the two former
leftists had no idea that Priscilla Johnson was associated with
the CIA, had tied up Marina Oswald for years, and then issued a
tract on both