UK and Europe · Public discussion

Titanium vs Aluminium - relative weights

Started by David · · Last activity · 23 posts · 956 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
31 August 2004
Last activity
6 September 2004
Original author
David
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
956
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. in message <[email hidden]>, David

    (') said:

    I'm getting a bit overfaced here in this thread by the Metallurgy :-)

    What I really would like to know is: for mountain bike use (XC and a
    bit of rough treatment) on 85% trails 15% asphalt, can I save much
    weight without compromising strength by investing in a composite or
    titanium frame ?

    Probably not enough to notice. The frame on Juliette's Santa Cruz
    Juliana (full suspension, aluminium, large) weighs about 2450 grammes
    including rear shock. Before it was built up I could easily hold the
    frame vertically above my head holding onto just one of the rear
    dropouts between finger and thumb. The frame on my Cannondale Jeckyll
    (full suspension, aluminium, large) weighs about 2890 grammes
    (according to Weight Weenies - I've never stripped the bike down to
    weigh it).

    By contrast, the all carbon-fibre frame of the EPX TerraShark, in medium
    and without shock, weighs 2340 grammes, so it's probably actually
    heavier.

    There's a Ghost 'RT Scandium' which Weight Weenies report as weighing
    1992 grammes including rear shock, but apart from that sub 2Kg 'large'
    suspension frames which you can actually buy are very rare in any
    material.

    Quoted message said:

    If so, is it worth the premium such a frame would cost for a non-pro
    rider. How much do these frames cost (by comparison)?

    The lightest mainstream full suspension frames you can currently get are
    probably the Scott Ground Zero frames - but they're being phased out in
    favour of the Genius, which is a bit heavier[1]. Failing that, the
    Scott Genius or the Santa Cruz Superlight. Under British conditions I'd
    go for the Santa Cruz, because the Scott has its rear shock right in
    front of the rear wheel where it will get covered in mud and be a
    maintenance nightmare.

    If you're really interested in saving grammes the weight difference
    between an anodized Santa Cruz Superlight and a painted one is nearly
    200 grammes - so go anodized. The frame will set you back £1200 list,
    built bikes from about £2,300 upwards (Juliette's, last year, including
    Hope Minis and some other nice bits, came in about £2500). It's a very
    very very nice bike.
    <URL:http://www.santacruzbikes.co.uk/completebikes/prices.html>

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; single speed mountain bikes: for people who cycle on flat mountains.

  2. David said:


    What I really would like to know is: for mountain bike use (XC and a
    bit of rough treatment) on 85% trails 15% asphalt, can I save much
    weight without compromising strength by investing in a composite or
    titanium frame ?

    Over good aluminium? I doubt it.

    A small amount of weight if you spend a large amount of money, I
    expect.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  3. On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:35:05 GMT, Simon Brooke <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    There's a Ghost 'RT Scandium' which Weight Weenies report as weighing
    1992 grammes including rear shock,

    BTW - Scandium frames are an aluminium alloy. Scandium is indeed an
    alloying ingredient, but you're not getting "a scandium frame" as I
    like to think of it !

    My XC hardtail MTB is a Habanero in 3/2.5 Ti. Lovely bike,
    especially the Ti aspect.
    --
    Smert' spamionam

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.