Titanium Frames

"Around Australia Recumbent Style" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Greetings all.
I read the other Titanium thread with much interest and then started to

ask

Quoted message said:

a few questions of people who I thought would know how good a "Ti" frame
would be.

I was told by one person that Titanium frames have a propensity to crack

due

Quoted message said:

to metal fatigue. This was supposed to be from the lack of give in the

very

Quoted message said:

rigid frame. He also said that pro riders don't really care if the frame
cracks because they can just chuck it away and get another.

Anyone had any experiences with this, or know of anyone who has had this
problem?

Thanks in advance.

Andrew

My el cheapo radioactive chinese Ti mountain bike frame has been going fine
for about two years now. (Ab)Used several times a week for long rides in the
bush. My two ti road bikes are going well too.

http://www.geo.net.au/~mart/personal/martys_bikes.htm

Marty

Around Australia Recumbent Style:

Quoted message said:

I was told by one person that Titanium frames have a propensity to crack due
to metal fatigue. This was supposed to be from the lack of give in the very
rigid frame.

This is nonsense. Look up the fatigue strength of titanium versus
aluminium, and see that the former has the advantage.

A frame that is well made will be durable regardless of the metal used.
A frame made of titanium will have a longer fatigue life over an
_equivalent_ aluminum frame. However, for a reasonably sized Al frame
(ie not stupid light), you're likely looking at a life of hundreds of
thousands of cycles, if not in the millions, the point being that
extending fatigue life beyond this is most likely not a significant
consideration. Many, if not most, aluminium frames last hundreds of
thousands of kms, lifetimes for many riders.

Quoted message said:

He also said that pro riders don't really care if the frame
cracks because they can just chuck it away and get another.

Maybe so, but this has nothing to do with what material the frames are
made of, but more of the money involved in sponsorships.

Enter this person in a tall stories contest; he might serve a useful
purpose there.

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Around Australia Recumbent Style:

Quoted message said:

This is nonsense. Look up the fatigue strength of titanium versus

aluminium, and see that the former has the advantage.

Actually, that's only one part or a very complex problem. But put simply,
neither Aluminium or Titanium has a fatigue limit. That is, one day after X
number of cycles, the material WILL break. Steel has a fatigue limit.
But this all is irrelevant, since it's the design of the frame (wall
thickness, design, joining etc) that is the biggest factor in how long a
frame of any metrial will last, and that frame's characteristics. The
material it's made out of is just one part of the design.

Cheers
Gemma

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Around Australia Recumbent Style:

Quoted message said:

This is nonsense. Look up the fatigue strength of titanium versus

aluminium, and see that the former has the advantage.

Actually, that's only one part or a very complex problem. But put simply,
neither Aluminium or Titanium has a fatigue limit. That is, one day after X
number of cycles, the material WILL break. Steel has a fatigue limit.

Nope, both titanium and steel have fatigue limits, Al does not.

Quoted message said:

But this all is irrelevant, since it's the design of the frame (wall
thickness, design, joining etc) that is the biggest factor in how long a
frame of any metrial will last, and that frame's characteristics. The
material it's made out of is just one part of the design.

Fatigue limit (or lack of) is not irrelevant, since in good designs it
is what defines the frame tube sizes for each material, such that either
the fatigue limit is not reached in steel and Ti frames, or the fatigue
life of the Al frame is of reasonable length.

Since there isn't much of a variance in most frame designs, the triangle
front and rear being the most common, it's not a complex thing to do to
design frame tubes of sufficient gauge using different metals to allow
for durability.

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Around Australia Recumbent Style:

> This is nonsense. Look up the fatigue strength of titanium versus
aluminium, and see that the former has the advantage.

Actually, that's only one part or a very complex problem. But put

simply,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

neither Aluminium or Titanium has a fatigue limit. That is, one day

after X

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

number of cycles, the material WILL break. Steel has a fatigue limit.

Nope, both titanium and steel have fatigue limits, Al does not.

Quoted message said:

But this all is irrelevant, since it's the design of the frame (wall
thickness, design, joining etc) that is the biggest factor in how long a
frame of any metrial will last, and that frame's characteristics. The
material it's made out of is just one part of the design.

Fatigue limit (or lack of) is not irrelevant, since in good designs it
is what defines the frame tube sizes for each material, such that either
the fatigue limit is not reached in steel and Ti frames, or the fatigue
life of the Al frame is of reasonable length.

Since there isn't much of a variance in most frame designs, the triangle
front and rear being the most common, it's not a complex thing to do to
design frame tubes of sufficient gauge using different metals to allow
for durability.

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Marty

"Marty Wallace" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Around Australia Recumbent Style:
>
> > This is nonsense. Look up the fatigue strength of titanium versus
> aluminium, and see that the former has the advantage.
>
Actually, that's only one part or a very complex problem. But put

simply,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

neither Aluminium or Titanium has a fatigue limit. That is, one day

after X

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

number of cycles, the material WILL break. Steel has a fatigue limit.

Nope, both titanium and steel have fatigue limits, Al does not.

Quoted message said:

But this all is irrelevant, since it's the design of the frame (wall
thickness, design, joining etc) that is the biggest factor in how long

a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

frame of any metrial will last, and that frame's characteristics. The
material it's made out of is just one part of the design.

Fatigue limit (or lack of) is not irrelevant, since in good designs it
is what defines the frame tube sizes for each material, such that either
the fatigue limit is not reached in steel and Ti frames, or the fatigue
life of the Al frame is of reasonable length.

Since there isn't much of a variance in most frame designs, the triangle
front and rear being the most common, it's not a complex thing to do to
design frame tubes of sufficient gauge using different metals to allow
for durability.

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Because of exactly what Jose said (sort of) - as frames _aren't_ necessarily
designed for durability!! I have seen quite a few broken frames in my
time...., cracked seat tubes, down tubes, stays... still waiting for a fork
to fail! Look around at all the expensive frames that only have a one-year
warranty - it's engineering for other things, lightness and the marketing
value mainly I'd say.
And apologies to Jose, I did get the fatigue limit [censored]-about, now I
remember why I didn't do mech eng 😉
It's Al and Magnesium I was thinking of (anyone own a Merida Mag? 😉
Cheers
Gemma

The issue of fatigue is an interesting one. I think all materials for
bike frame manufacture could crack under fatigue type loading.

But let's examine the loading required to initiate fatigue. First of all
materials have elastic and plastic deformation zones.

The elastic zone is where the material can be loaded (to say 10kN) then
unloaded, without a change a change in any dimension.

If you go past the elastic limit of the material it will deform and it
will not return to it's original dimensions or shape. This is a good
property of say Al & Fe, because we can sometimes detect parts are
fatiguing before they break!

The other component that can dramatically assist fatigue is a stress
concentrator. If you a nick or a scratch in the material at the right
place that fatigue wants occur, it will hasten the process 10 fold.

powinc

--

Marty Wallace:

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since there isn't much of a variance in most frame designs, the triangle
front and rear being the most common, it's not a complex thing to do to
design frame tubes of sufficient gauge using different metals to allow
for durability.

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Several things: poor welding techniques (cheap), inadequate post-welding
heat treatment (cheap), undersized frame tube thickness (for that
stupid-light feel). I also believe (but haven't got empirical evidence
of) that Al alloys like the 7000 series are more prone to
stress-corrosion fractures once their usually anodized surfaces are
breached by scratches and the like. You can glean a hint of this when
manufacturers like Race Face warn on stress corrosion and taking off
anodization on their cranks, and looking at the properties of the higher
series aluminium alloys. HOWEVER, how much more likely stress corrosion
is to happen in these alloys once the anodizing is breached is anybody's
guess, or if it is really much of a concern at all.

powinc:

Quoted message said:

The issue of fatigue is an interesting one. I think all materials for
bike frame manufacture could crack under fatigue type loading.

But let's examine the loading required to initiate fatigue. First of all
materials have elastic and plastic deformation zones.

The elastic zone is where the material can be loaded (to say 10kN) then
unloaded, without a change a change in any dimension.

If you go past the elastic limit of the material it will deform and it
will not return to it's original dimensions or shape. This is a good
property of say Al & Fe, because we can sometimes detect parts are
fatiguing before they break!

What you mention has to do with tensile strength and modulus of
elasticity, and while it has some bearing on fatigue, it's a different
mechanism.

Al can be cyclic loaded within the elastic zone and yet its fatigue life
is still shortened because it does not have a fatigue limit. You won't
see any permanent deformations and yet it will still fail after a
certain number of loads. Steel and Ti can also be cyclic loaded within
their elastic zones but if their fatigue limits are reached, they will
fail eventually.

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

now I remember why I didn't do mech eng 😉

It's all good though!

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

now I remember why I didn't do mech eng 😉

It's all good though!

I went down the civil eng path. I also remember the "Engineering Materials"
subjects were always after lunch on a cheap beer Wednesday or something like
that... *grin*
Gemma

On Mon, 3 May 2004 10:57:47 +0930, "Gemma Kernich" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Jose Rizal" <_@_._> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gemma Kernich:

Quoted message said:

now I remember why I didn't do mech eng 😉

It's all good though!

I went down the civil eng path. I also remember the "Engineering Materials"
subjects were always after lunch on a cheap beer Wednesday or something like
that... *grin*

Well I *did* do mech eng (and civil, electrical, etc.) and I can't
remember the details of most of this stuff. It was a long time ago and
I went straight into the software development after uni. But I'm
enjoying reading the posts, so thank you to the experts.

PS, There's an interesting article on carbon fibre by Raoul Luescher
in the Q & A section of May June 2004 Bicycling Australia. Raoul has
posted here in the past.

--
Regards.
Richard.

Thank You everyone for your input, most of which went straight over my head
at the same altitude as the Space Shuttle, but I think I get the engineering
drift.

Nice bikes Marty. I think I might have to try those Chinese Ti frames after
all.

Regards and safe travels,

Andrew

"Around Australia Recumbent Style" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Greetings all.
I read the other Titanium thread with much interest and then started to

ask

Quoted message said:

a few questions of people who I thought would know how good a "Ti" frame
would be.

I was told by one person that Titanium frames have a propensity to crack

due

Quoted message said:

to metal fatigue. This was supposed to be from the lack of give in the

very

Quoted message said:

rigid frame. He also said that pro riders don't really care if the frame
cracks because they can just chuck it away and get another.

Anyone had any experiences with this, or know of anyone who has had this
problem?

Thanks in advance.

Andrew

"Marty Wallace" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:4094bef3$0$27645
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Because aluminium is now far and away the most common frame material. When
it was steel, you used to see plenty of cracked steel frames.

"John Stevenson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Marty Wallace" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:4094bef3$0$27645
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Because aluminium is now far and away the most common frame material. When
it was steel, you used to see plenty of cracked steel frames.

I disagree with that.
I've been riding for a long time and steel frames never cracked at the rate
that I see aluminium ones failing. As a matter of fact, I've never
personally seen a steel frame fail.

Marty

"Marty Wallace" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"John Stevenson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Marty Wallace" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:4094bef3$0$27645
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

So why do we see so many cracked Aluminium frames?

Because aluminium is now far and away the most common frame material.

When

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

it was steel, you used to see plenty of cracked steel frames.

I disagree with that.
I've been riding for a long time and steel frames never cracked at the

rate

Quoted message said:

that I see aluminium ones failing. As a matter of fact, I've never
personally seen a steel frame fail.

I've had two steel frames and three Al frames crack (but I've ridden more Al
frames than steel). I do have a Titanium frame now, but it's only done about
500 km so way too early to tell.

Jeff