UK and Europe · Public discussion

Tired Tyres

Started by Ben · · Last activity · 23 posts · 703 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
8 August 2006
Last activity
16 August 2006
Original author
Ben
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
703
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Mark Thompson" <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail*_turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone here advise on tyre width pros/cons?

    It seems that narrower = lower rolling resistance = faster

    but

    narrower also = more fragile, less cushioning

    Currently I ride with 700*35, and they have been fine. It seems that I
    could use 32's or 28's, but is there any concensus on whether it would
    be worth it? All my riding is on roads or well prepared paths, mainly
    commuting or touring...

    Not sure about them being more fragile, but narrower tyres definately have
    less rolling resistance and are lighter, making them easier to accelerate.

    Having said that, if your cruising speed on the flat is around 15mph or
    less I'd be mildly surprised if you could notice the better performance.

    A few years ago I switched from 32 to 28 on my tourer.
    At the time, I was measuring my commute (all on road) on a daily basis,
    around 15-17mph depending on the weather. I reckoned I gained a little less
    than 1mph as a result of the tyre change.

    Steve.

  2. Quoting Ben <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    I've had a Dawes Horizon for about 18 months. The bike has done about
    9000 miles, and the rear tyre is looking like it could do with
    replacing. Bike shops have such an enourmous range though, both in
    appearance and cost. The size is 700*35C, which I assume will be
    something I need to stick to, but as for the rest... All my cycling is
    on roads or reasonable tracks, so slicks are in order I'd guess.

    On the tandem we have Bontrager Select Ks in 700x35C; the tread pattern is
    purely cosmetic. We've had one tyre fail unexpectedly ever...
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?
    Today is Potmos, August.

  3. Quoting
    Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail*_turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com>:

    Quoted message said:

    Not sure about them being more fragile, but narrower tyres definately have
    less rolling resistance and are lighter, making them easier to accelerate.

    Easier to accelerate... to a completely trivial and quite possibly
    unmeasureable degree.
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?
    Today is Potmos, August.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.